Suppr超能文献

分泌花蜜和无花蜜:花内距的结构

Nectar-Secreting and Nectarless : Structure of the Inner Floral Spur.

作者信息

Stpiczyńska Małgorzata, Kamińska Magdalena, Davies Kevin L, Pansarin Emerson R

机构信息

Faculty of Biology, Botanic Garden, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Department of Botany, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jun 20;9:840. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00840. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

, the largest genus of Neotropical orchids, contains both nectar-secreting and nectarless species. Here, we compare the fine structure of the inner floral spur, termed the cuniculus, in nectariferous (, ) and seemingly nectarless (, , ) species. This is the first time for such a detailed investigation of cuniculus structure to be undertaken for Our aim was to characterize features indicative of secretory activity and to ascertain whether flowers presumed to be nectarless produce alternative pollinator food-rewards. The cuniculus is formed by fusion of the basal part of the labellum and column and extends alongside the ovary and transmitting tract. Our study indicates that all investigated species produce nectar or nectar-like secretion to varying degrees, and no alternative pollinator food-rewards were observed. Even though macroscopic investigation of presumed rewardless species failed to reveal the presence of secretion within the cuniculus, close observations of the cells lining the cuniculus by LM, SEM, and TEM revealed the presence of cuticular blisters and surface material. Moreover, the similarity of both the thick tangential cell walls (with the exception of ) and organelle complement of cuniculus epidermal cells in both copiously nectariferous species and those producing only small quantities of surface secretion confirmed the presence of secretory activity in species generally regarded to be rewardless. The secretory character was particularly obvious in the cells of the cuniculus of but also in and since electron-dense cytoplasm and mitochondria, ER and secretory vesicles were abundant. Furthermore, cell wall protuberances occurred in , which was indicative of intense transmembrane transport. This investigation highlights the need to examine more closely whether spp. considered to lack food-rewards based solely on macroscopic examination really are rewardless and deceptive.

摘要

[该属为新热带兰科中最大的属,包含分泌花蜜和无花蜜的物种。在此,我们比较了有花蜜分泌的物种([具体物种 1]、[具体物种 2])和看似无花蜜的物种([具体物种 3]、[具体物种 4]、[具体物种 5])中花内距(称为“cuniculus”)的精细结构。这是首次对[该属]的距结构进行如此详细的研究。我们的目的是确定指示分泌活动的特征,并确定被认为无花蜜的花朵是否产生替代传粉者的食物奖励。距由唇瓣基部和蕊柱融合形成,并沿着子房和传输通道延伸。我们的研究表明,所有被研究的物种都不同程度地产生花蜜或类似花蜜的分泌物,且未观察到替代传粉者的食物奖励。尽管对推测无奖励的物种进行宏观观察未能揭示距内有分泌物,但通过光学显微镜、扫描电子显微镜和透射电子显微镜对距内壁细胞的仔细观察发现了角质层水泡和表面物质。此外,花蜜分泌丰富的物种和仅产生少量表面分泌物的物种中,距表皮细胞的厚切向细胞壁(除[具体情况]外)和细胞器组成的相似性证实了通常被认为无奖励的物种中存在分泌活动。分泌特征在[具体物种 1]的距细胞中尤为明显,但在[具体物种 2]和[具体物种 3]中也很明显,因为富含电子致密的细胞质、线粒体、内质网和分泌小泡。此外,[具体物种 4]中出现了细胞壁突起,这表明存在强烈的跨膜运输。这项研究强调需要更仔细地研究仅基于宏观检查被认为缺乏食物奖励的[该属物种]是否真的无奖励且具欺骗性]。

需注意,原文中部分具体物种名缺失,翻译时用[具体物种 X]表示以便理解结构,实际翻译时应补充完整准确的物种名。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/404f/6019460/ce992310de9a/fpls-09-00840-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验