Independent Practice.
School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jul;147(7):1005-1022. doi: 10.1037/xge0000449.
Memory tasks involve a degree of judgment and strategic decision-making, based upon the perceived benefits of particular learning, maintenance and recall strategies. The consequences of these metacognitive judgments for memory have been amply documented under experimental conditions that require participants to focus upon a task in the absence of distractors. Eight experiments consider the impact of less benign environmental conditions-specifically, the presence of distracting speech-upon the metacognitive aspects of memory. Distraction reliably disrupted free recall and, as indicated by judgments of learning, participants were aware of this effect. However, because participants did not adjust study time in compensation, the distraction effect was exaggerated relative to experimenter-imposed presentation rates. This finding appears to be the consequence of distraction-induced disruption of time perception at encoding, rather than any deliberate strategy. The results highlight the need to consider the impact of more challenging environments on metacognition generally. (PsycINFO Database Record
记忆任务涉及一定程度的判断和策略决策,这些判断和决策是基于对特定学习、保持和回忆策略的益处的感知。在需要参与者专注于一项任务而不受干扰的实验条件下,这些元认知判断对记忆的影响已经得到了充分的证明。八项实验研究了环境条件不那么良性的情况下(即存在分散注意力的言语)对记忆的元认知方面的影响。干扰确实会破坏自由回忆,而且正如学习判断所表明的那样,参与者意识到了这种影响。然而,由于参与者没有调整学习时间来补偿,因此与实验者强制呈现的速度相比,干扰效应被夸大了。这一发现似乎是由于干扰导致的在编码时对时间感知的破坏,而不是任何故意的策略。研究结果强调了需要考虑更具挑战性的环境对元认知的普遍影响。