• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态血管生成开关作为转移性结直肠癌患者化疗-贝伐珠单抗反应的预测指标。

Dynamic Angiogenic Switch as Predictor of Response to Chemotherapy-Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

机构信息

Clara Campal Comprehensive Cancer Center.

CEU San Pablo University.

出版信息

Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;42(1):56-59. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000474.

DOI:10.1097/COC.0000000000000474
PMID:29975196
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients treated with bevacizumab, experience variation in the plasma levels of angiogenesis growth factors and related cytokines, called angiogenic switch (AS). The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship between AS and the clinical response during standard chemotherapy-bevacizumab treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1 mCRC were eligible. Patients received treatment with standard dose capecitabine plus either oxaliplatin or irinotecan and bevacizumab for 6 cycles. Initial treatment was followed by maintenance therapy with bevacizumab plus capecitabine until progression. Plasma levels of angiogenic-related cytokines (hepatocyte growth factor, placental growth factor, macrophage chemoattractant protein-3, MM-9, eotaxin, basic fibroblast growth factor, and interleukin 18) were prospectively analyzed at baseline and every 8 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 71 patients were enrolled. AS was observed in 45 patients (63.4%), 28 of whom experienced AS at the first evaluation after treatment start. Disease control, which includes partial/complete response and stable disease, was seen in 96% of AS patients (43/45), but only in 15/26 (58%) for the remaining patients without evidence of AS (P<0.001). The median PFS of AS patients was 11.4 months (95% confidence interval, 8.6-15.8) versus 8.3 months for patients without AS (95% confidence interval, 5.6-16.4; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab combination in mCRC patients results in dynamic changes in plasma cytokines, which is associated with better disease control and longer PFS. These new findings support continuing studying AS as a potential marker of angiogenesis inhibitor effectiveness.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,接受贝伐单抗治疗的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者,其血管生成生长因子和相关细胞因子的血浆水平会发生变化,这种变化被称为血管生成开关(AS)。本研究旨在分析 AS 与标准化疗-贝伐单抗治疗期间临床反应之间的关系。

患者和方法

符合条件的患者为东部肿瘤协作组 0-1 期 mCRC 患者。患者接受标准剂量卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂或伊立替康和贝伐单抗治疗 6 个周期。初始治疗后,贝伐单抗联合卡培他滨维持治疗,直至疾病进展。在基线和每 8 周时,前瞻性分析血管生成相关细胞因子(肝细胞生长因子、胎盘生长因子、巨噬细胞趋化因子-3、MM-9、嗜酸性粒细胞趋化因子、碱性成纤维细胞生长因子和白细胞介素 18)的血浆水平。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

共纳入 71 例患者。45 例(63.4%)患者出现 AS,其中 28 例在治疗开始后首次评估时出现 AS。AS 患者疾病控制率(包括部分/完全缓解和稳定疾病)为 96%(43/45),而无 AS 患者的疾病控制率仅为 15/26(58%)(P<0.001)。AS 患者的中位 PFS 为 11.4 个月(95%置信区间,8.6-15.8),而无 AS 患者的中位 PFS 为 8.3 个月(95%置信区间,5.6-16.4;P=0.04)。

结论

贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗 mCRC 患者可导致血浆细胞因子发生动态变化,与更好的疾病控制和更长的 PFS 相关。这些新发现支持继续研究 AS 作为抗血管生成抑制剂疗效的潜在标志物。

相似文献

1
Dynamic Angiogenic Switch as Predictor of Response to Chemotherapy-Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.动态血管生成开关作为转移性结直肠癌患者化疗-贝伐珠单抗反应的预测指标。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;42(1):56-59. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000474.
2
Modified XELIRI (capecitabine plus irinotecan) versus FOLFIRI (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan), both either with or without bevacizumab, as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (AXEPT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.改良 XELIRI(卡培他滨联合伊立替康)对比 FOLFIRI(亚叶酸钙、氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康),二者均联合或不联合贝伐珠单抗,作为转移性结直肠癌的二线治疗(AXEPT):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、非劣效性、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):660-671. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30140-2. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
3
Primary tumor location and bevacizumab effectiveness in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌患者的原发肿瘤部位与贝伐珠单抗疗效。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24(10):2554-2559. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt253. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
4
A phase II study of bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective, multicenter trial of the Korean Cancer Study Group.贝伐珠单抗、奥沙利铂和卡培他滨治疗未经治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的 II 期研究:韩国癌症研究组的前瞻性多中心试验。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb;37(1):19-23. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31826b9c94.
5
Maintenance strategies after first-line oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (AIO 0207): a randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 3 trial.一线奥沙利铂联合氟尿嘧啶类加贝伐珠单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者后的维持策略(AIO 0207):一项随机、非劣效性、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1355-69. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00042-X. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
6
Bevacizumab plus XELOX as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: The OBELIX study.贝伐单抗联合XELOX方案作为转移性结直肠癌的一线治疗:OBELIX研究
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 21;21(23):7281-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i23.7281.
7
Correlation of angiogenic biomarker signatures with clinical outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab.贝伐珠单抗联合卡培他滨、奥沙利铂治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的血管生成生物标志物特征与临床结局的相关性。
Cancer Med. 2013 Apr;2(2):234-42. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
Pharmacogenetic angiogenesis profiling for first-line Bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌患者一线贝伐珠单抗联合奥沙利铂化疗的药物遗传学血管生成分析。
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Sep 1;17(17):5783-92. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1115. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
9
A phase I/II study of capecitabine given on a week on/week off schedule combined with bevacizumab and oxaliplatin for patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer.卡培他滨每周给药 1 周停药 1 周联合贝伐珠单抗和奥沙利铂治疗未经治疗的晚期结直肠癌的 I/II 期研究。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011 Jun;10(2):117-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
10
Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with or without bevacizumab: can the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predict the efficiency of bevacizumab?使用或不使用贝伐单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌:中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值能否预测贝伐单抗的疗效?
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(12):4781-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.12.4781.

引用本文的文献

1
Status of alternative angiogenic pathways in glioblastoma resected under and after bevacizumab treatment.贝伐珠单抗治疗下和治疗后切除的胶质母细胞瘤中替代血管生成途径的状态。
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2024 Apr;41(2):61-72. doi: 10.1007/s10014-024-00481-0. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
2
Construction and validation of a novel angiogenesis pattern to predict prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy in colorectal cancer.构建并验证一种新型血管生成模式,以预测结直肠癌的预后和免疫治疗疗效。
Aging (Albany NY). 2023 Nov 7;15(21):12413-12450. doi: 10.18632/aging.205189.
3
Identification of significant genes in non-small cell lung cancer by bioinformatics analyses.
通过生物信息学分析鉴定非小细胞肺癌中的显著基因。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Jul;9(7):4330-4340. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2596.
4
Opportunities and Challenges of Nanoparticles in Digestive Tumours as Anti-Angiogenic Therapies.纳米颗粒作为抗血管生成疗法在消化系统肿瘤中的机遇与挑战
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;11:789330. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.789330. eCollection 2021.
5
Tumor Microenvironment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Arbitrator in Patients' Outcome.转移性结直肠癌中的肿瘤微环境:患者预后的仲裁者
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 6;13(5):1130. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051130.
6
Current challenges in the implementation of precision oncology for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌管理中精准肿瘤学实施的当前挑战。
ESMO Open. 2020 Mar;5(2). doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000634.
7
Dynamic Biomarkers of Response to Antiangiogenic Therapies in Colorectal Cancer: A Review.结直肠癌抗血管生成治疗反应的动态生物标志物:综述
Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med. 2017 Dec;15(2):81-85. doi: 10.2174/1875692115666170815161754.