Suppr超能文献

单侧左脑尾侧未定带深部脑刺激对声音震颤的疗效与双侧刺激相同:来自7例特发性震颤患者的证据。

Unilateral Left Deep Brain Stimulation of the Caudal Zona Incerta Is Equally Effective on Voice Tremor as Bilateral Stimulation: Evidence from 7 Patients with Essential Tremor.

作者信息

Sandström Linda, Karlsson Fredrik, Blomstedt Patric

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018;96(3):157-161. doi: 10.1159/000489938. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is less effective on voice tremor than arm tremor, and it is generally assumed that successful voice tremor treatment requires bilateral DBS and possibly more precise thalamic stimulation. However, recent findings suggest that these assumptions should be reconsidered.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether unilateral DBS targeting the caudal zona incerta (cZi) may be sufficient to alleviate voice tremor in patients with essential tremor, or whether bilateral stimulation is needed.

METHODS

Seven patients with voice tremor off stimulation were evaluated during bilateral stimulation using their clinical settings, and during unilateral left stimulation in iterations with increasing stimulation amplitude. Two expert listeners assessed voice tremor severity in all samples in a blinded procedure.

RESULTS

Six patients had comparable or better effects with unilateral left stimulation compared to bilateral stimulation. For the seventh patient, unilateral DBS at a slightly higher amplitude achieved similar results as bilateral DBS. Overall, high-amplitude stimulation did not appear to be beneficial on voice tremor.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral left and bilateral cZi-DBS had comparable effects on voice tremor in the investigated group of 7 patients. This finding suggests that the assumption that bilateral DBS is required to treat voice tremor may need to be reconsidered.

摘要

背景/目的:与手臂震颤相比,深部脑刺激(DBS)对声音震颤的效果较差,通常认为成功治疗声音震颤需要双侧DBS,可能还需要更精确的丘脑刺激。然而,最近的研究结果表明这些假设应重新考虑。

目的

评估针对尾侧未定带(cZi)的单侧DBS是否足以缓解特发性震颤患者的声音震颤,或者是否需要双侧刺激。

方法

7例未接受刺激的声音震颤患者在双侧刺激时按照其临床设置进行评估,在单侧左侧刺激时逐渐增加刺激幅度进行多次评估。两名专业听众在盲法程序中评估所有样本的声音震颤严重程度。

结果

与双侧刺激相比,6例患者在单侧左侧刺激时效果相当或更好。对于第7例患者,稍高幅度的单侧DBS取得了与双侧DBS相似的结果。总体而言,高幅度刺激似乎对声音震颤无益。

结论

在7例患者的研究组中,单侧左侧和双侧cZi-DBS对声音震颤的效果相当。这一发现表明,治疗声音震颤需要双侧DBS这一假设可能需要重新考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验