Suppr超能文献

焦虑相关注意测量的心理计量学比较。

A psychometric comparison of anxiety-relevant attention measures.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , University of Miami , Coral Gables , FL , USA.

b Department of Psychology , Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge , LA , USA.

出版信息

Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018 Sep;31(5):539-554. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1489536. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Preferential attention to threat, emotional response inhibition, and attentional control each purportedly play a key role in anxiety disorders. Divergent psychometric properties among attention measures may produce differential detection of anxiety-related associations and treatment-related changes. However, no studies have directly compared the psychometric properties of these attention measures in the same sample.

DESIGN

Eighty-five young adults (M = 19.41 years, SD = 1.47, 48 Females) completed a cognitive task battery and a subset of 60 participants (M = 19.42 years, SD = 1.48, 33 Females) completed the task battery again approximately two weeks later.

METHOD

To assess preferential attention to threat, emotional response inhibition, and attentional control, the cognitive task battery included a dot-probe task, emotion and gender Stroop tasks, and a flanker task. Tasks varied in how attention was directed and if emotional stimuli were included. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were compared across measures.

RESULTS

Within the same sample, internal consistency and reliability differed across attention measures. Explicit attention measures (emotional Stroop and flanker) exhibited stronger internal consistency and greater test-retest reliability compared to implicit measures (dot-probe and gender Stroop).

CONCLUSIONS

These results inform clinical research using attention measures to assess anxiety-related differences and treatment response.

摘要

背景与目的

优先关注威胁、情绪反应抑制和注意力控制,据称这些因素在焦虑障碍中起着关键作用。注意力测量方法的不同心理测量特性可能会导致对焦虑相关关联和治疗相关变化的不同检测。然而,尚无研究在同一样本中直接比较这些注意力测量方法的心理测量特性。

设计

85 名年轻成年人(M=19.41 岁,SD=1.47,48 名女性)完成了认知任务组合,大约两周后,60 名参与者中的一小部分(M=19.42 岁,SD=1.48,33 名女性)再次完成了任务组合。

方法

为了评估对威胁的优先关注、情绪反应抑制和注意力控制,认知任务组合包括点探测任务、情绪和性别斯特鲁普任务以及侧翼任务。任务在注意力的引导方式和是否包含情绪刺激方面有所不同。比较了各测量方法的内部一致性和重测信度。

结果

在同一样本中,注意力测量方法的内部一致性和可靠性存在差异。显性注意力测量方法(情绪斯特鲁普和侧翼)的内部一致性和重测信度均强于隐性测量方法(点探测和性别斯特鲁普)。

结论

这些结果为使用注意力测量方法评估焦虑相关差异和治疗反应的临床研究提供了信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验