Suppr超能文献

如何教导医学生做出明智选择?一项基于视频与文本病例场景的随机对照交叉研究。

How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen University Medical Centre, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, D-37075, Göttingen, Germany.

Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Göttingen University Medical Centre, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, D-37075, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2018 Jul 6;16(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1090-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Choosing Wisely campaign highlights the importance of clinical reasoning abilities for competent and reflective physicians. The principles of this campaign should be addressed in undergraduate medical education. Recent research suggests that answering questions on important steps in patient management promotes knowledge retention. It is less clear whether increasing the authenticity of educational material by the inclusion of videos further enhances learning outcome.

METHODS

In a prospective randomised controlled cross-over study, we assessed whether repeated video-based testing is more effective than repeated text-based testing in training students to choose appropriate diagnostic tests, arrive at correct diagnoses and identify advisable therapies. Following an entry exam, fourth-year undergraduate medical students attended 10 weekly computer-based seminars during which they studied patient case histories. Each case contained five key feature questions (items) on the diagnosis and treatment of the presented patient. Students were randomly allocated to read text cases (control condition) or watch videos (intervention), and assignment to either text or video was switched between groups every week. Using a within-subjects design, student performance on video-based and text-based items was assessed 13 weeks (exit exam) and 9 months (retention test) after the first day of term. The primary outcome was the within-subject difference in performance on video-based and text-based items in the exit exam.

RESULTS

Of 125 eligible students, 93 provided data for all three exams (response rate 74.4%). Percent scores were significantly higher for video-based than for text-based items in the exit exam (76.2 ± 19.4% vs. 72.4 ± 19.1%, p = 0.026) but not the retention test (69.2 ± 20.2% vs. 66.4 ± 20.3%, p = 0.108). An additional Bayesian analysis of this retention test suggested that video-based training is marginally more effective than text-based training in the long term (Bayes factor 2.36). Regardless of presentation format, student responses revealed a high prevalence of erroneous beliefs that, if applied to the clinical context, could place patients at risk.

CONCLUSION

Repeated video-based key feature testing produces superior short-term learning outcome compared to text-based testing. Given the high prevalence of misconceptions, efforts to improve clinical reasoning training in medical education are warranted. The Choosing Wisely campaign lends itself to being part of this process.

摘要

背景

“明智选择”运动强调了临床推理能力对于有能力且善于反思的医生的重要性。该运动的原则应纳入本科医学教育。最近的研究表明,回答患者管理重要步骤的问题有助于保留知识。但是,通过纳入视频来提高教育材料的真实性是否会进一步提高学习效果尚不清楚。

方法

在一项前瞻性随机对照交叉研究中,我们评估了重复基于视频的测试是否比重复基于文本的测试更有效地培训学生选择合适的诊断测试、得出正确的诊断并确定可行的治疗方法。在入学考试后,四年级医学生参加了 10 次每周一次的计算机基础研讨会,在此期间他们学习了患者病史。每个病例都包含五个关键特征问题(项目),用于诊断和治疗所呈现的患者。学生被随机分配阅读文本病例(对照条件)或观看视频(干预条件),并且每周在文本和视频之间切换组的分配。使用受试者内设计,在学期第一天的 13 周(期末考试)和 9 个月(保留测试)后评估学生在基于视频和基于文本项目上的表现。主要结果是期末考试中基于视频和基于文本项目的受试者内差异。

结果

在 125 名符合条件的学生中,有 93 名学生提供了所有三项考试的数据(应答率为 74.4%)。期末考试中基于视频的项目得分显著高于基于文本的项目(76.2±19.4%比 72.4±19.1%,p=0.026),但保留测试中得分没有显著差异(69.2±20.2%比 66.4±20.3%,p=0.108)。对保留测试的额外贝叶斯分析表明,从长期来看,基于视频的培训比基于文本的培训略有效(贝叶斯因子 2.36)。无论呈现格式如何,学生的回答都揭示了错误信念的高流行率,如果将这些错误信念应用于临床环境,可能会使患者面临风险。

结论

与基于文本的测试相比,重复基于视频的关键特征测试可产生更好的短期学习效果。鉴于误解的高流行率,有必要努力改善医学教育中的临床推理培训。“明智选择”运动适合成为这一过程的一部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验