Tarverdizade Asl Pouya, Lakdizaji Sima, Ghahramanian Akram, Seyedrasooli Alehe, Ghavipanjeh Rezaiy Somayeh
Department of Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran.
Department of Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz, Iran.
J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):95-100. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2018.015. eCollection 2018 Jun.
The quality of life of patients undergoing hemodialysis is lower; to improve their living conditions, patients need further training. This study conducted to compare the effectiveness of two methods of text messaging and face to face education on knowledge and quality of life of patients under hemodialysis. Undergoing in a clinical trial study, 60 patients undergoing hemodialysis in Sina-teaching hospital of Tabriz, Iran were selected by convenience sampling and randomly allocated into three groups: two intervention groups: text massaging (P=20), face to face group (n=20) and one control group (n=20). Their knowledge and quality of life were assessed and compared by Chronic Hemodialysis Knowledge Survey (CHeKS) and Kidney Disease Quality of Life-short form (KDQOL-SF) questionnaires. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 13. After intervention, the knowledge of text messaging and face to face groups were significantly more than the control group, but the quality of life scores after intervention had not any significant difference among the three groups. Intra-group comparisons showed that quality of life in face to face group have been significantly increased. Text messaging and face to face teaching were effective on improving knowledge of patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, the effectiveness of these methods on quality of life needs further evaluations in different setting for longer times in hemodialysis patients.
接受血液透析的患者生活质量较低；为改善他们的生活状况，患者需要进一步培训。本研究旨在比较两种教育方法——短信教育和面对面教育——对血液透析患者知识水平和生活质量的影响。在一项临床试验研究中，通过便利抽样法选取了伊朗大不里士市西纳教学医院的60名接受血液透析的患者，并将他们随机分为三组：两个干预组，即短信组（n = 20）、面对面组（n = 20）和一个对照组（n = 20）。通过慢性血液透析知识调查（CHeKS）问卷和肾脏病生活质量简表（KDQOL - SF）问卷对他们的知识水平和生活质量进行评估和比较。数据采用SPSS 13版软件进行分析。干预后，短信组和面对面组患者的知识水平显著高于对照组，但三组干预后的生活质量得分无显著差异。组内比较显示，面对面组的生活质量显著提高。短信教育和面对面教育在提高血液透析患者知识水平方面是有效的。然而，这些方法对生活质量的有效性需要在不同环境下对血液透析患者进行更长时间的进一步评估。
