• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Implementation Challenges for Risk-Stratified Screening in the Era of Precision Medicine.

作者信息

Roberts Megan C

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, The National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1484-1485. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1940.

DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1940
PMID:29978191
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Implementation Challenges for Risk-Stratified Screening in the Era of Precision Medicine.精准医学时代风险分层筛查的实施挑战
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1484-1485. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1940.
2
[Influence of organizational factors on implementation of a personalized approach to breast cancer screening].[组织因素对实施乳腺癌个性化筛查方法的影响]
Sante Publique. 2016 May-Jun;28(3):353-61.
3
Precision risk-based screening might maximize benefit and minimize harm.基于精准风险的筛查可能会使益处最大化并使危害最小化。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;15(11):661-662. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0093-0.
4
Population-level breast screening: how to salvage the concept?人群层面的乳腺癌筛查：如何挽救这一概念？
J R Soc Med. 2020 Aug;113(8):306-309. doi: 10.1177/0141076820910317.
5
Personalized medicine for prevention: can risk stratified screening decrease colorectal cancer mortality at an acceptable cost?预防的个性化医疗：风险分层筛查能否以可接受的成本降低结直肠癌死亡率？
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Apr;28(4):299-308. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0864-4. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
6
Is It the Era for Personalized Screening?个性化筛查的时代到来了吗？
Radiol Clin North Am. 2021 Jan;59(1):129-138. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
7
Refining Lung Cancer Screening Criteria in the Era of Value-Based Medicine.在价值医疗时代完善肺癌筛查标准
PLoS Med. 2017 Feb 7;14(2):e1002226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002226. eCollection 2017 Feb.
8
Population-based Genetic Testing for Precision Prevention.基于人群的遗传检测用于精准预防。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Aug;13(8):643-648. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0002. Epub 2020 May 14.
9
Smarter screening for cancer: possibilities and challenges of personalization.更智能的癌症筛查：个性化的可能性与挑战
JAMA. 2014 Dec 3;312(21):2211-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13933.
10
Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level.个体化治疗时代的乳腺癌筛查：基于风险和偏好的人群水平策略的概念模型和美国国家癌症研究所倡议。
Cancer. 2014 Oct 1;120(19):2955-64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28771. Epub 2014 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Proactive process evaluation of precision medicine platforms: a roadmap.精准医学平台的前瞻性过程评估：路线图
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jul 20;32(1):e101434. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101434.
2
A New Breast Density Assessment Method Using Portable Document Format.一种使用便携式文档格式的新乳房密度评估方法。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Nov 1;25(11):3947-3951. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.11.3947.
3
Women's perspectives on the acceptability of risk-based cervical cancer screening.女性对基于风险的宫颈癌筛查可接受性的看法。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 25;24(1):1314. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13050-7.
4
Understanding the Preferences and Considerations of the Public Towards Risk-Stratified Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Insights From Think-Aloud Interviews Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment.了解公众对结直肠癌风险分层筛查的偏好和考虑因素：基于离散选择实验的出声思维访谈的见解。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14153. doi: 10.1111/hex.14153.
5
Ethical considerations in sarcopenia research.肌肉减少症研究中的伦理考量。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2023 Dec 2;16:8. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v16i8.14303. eCollection 2023.
6
Ethical challenges in gestational diabetes.妊娠期糖尿病中的伦理挑战。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2023 Aug 19;16:6. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v16i6.13470. eCollection 2023.
7
Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Korean Women.纳入多基因风险评分和非遗传风险因素的韩国女性乳腺癌风险预测模型的建立。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Sep 1;32(9):1182-1189. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0064.
8
Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.基于人群的前瞻性队列研究：东亚常见癌症的多基因风险评分预测。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82608. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82608.
9
Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment and Precision Approaches to Screening: Brave New World or Worlds Apart?结直肠癌风险评估与精准筛查方法：崭新世界还是相去甚远？
Gastroenterology. 2023 Apr;164(5):812-827. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.021. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
10
A community jury study exploring the public acceptability of using risk stratification to determine eligibility for cancer screening.社区陪审团研究探索使用风险分层来确定癌症筛查资格的公众可接受性。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1789-1806. doi: 10.1111/hex.13522. Epub 2022 May 8.