Kapinos Gregory, Trinka Eugen, Kaplan Peter W
Department of Neurology, State University of New York Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, New York, U.S.A.
Department of Neurology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jul;35(4):314-324. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000468.
We propose a comprehensive review of the subject of epileptiform and potentially harmful EEG patterns that lie on the interictal continuum (IIC) to help with therapeutic decision-making and target future research. This approach to "electro-physiological SE" encompasses five dimensions of the IIC: it characterizes a periodic or rhythmic pattern, not only regarding its ictal morphology and potential harm with secondary neuronal injury, but also addresses the "metabolic footprint," clinical repercussion, and epileptogenic potential. Recent studies have attempted to determine and qualify the ictal nature and the epileptogenic potential (i.e., risk of subsequent acute seizures) of particular IIC patterns and their intrinsic EEG characteristics. Others have correlated non-convulsive seizures with cognitive outcomes beyond mortality; non-convulsive seizures and sporadic, periodic, or rhythmic discharges to encephalopathy severity; and the spectrum of periodic or rhythmic patterns to measurable secondary brain injury. Equivocal periodic or rhythmic patterns on the IIC are frequently encountered in critical care neurology where clinicians often incorporate advanced neuroimaging, metabolic neuromonitoring, and anti-seizure drug short trials, in an effort to gauge these patterns. We propose portraying the IIC with a multiaxial graph to disambiguate each of these risks. Quantification along each axis may help calibrate therapeutic urgency. An adaptable scoring system assesses which quasi-ictal EEG patterns in this spectrum might reach the tipping point toward anti-seizure drug escalation, in neurocritically ill patients.
我们建议对发作间期连续体(IIC)上的癫痫样及潜在有害脑电图模式这一主题进行全面综述,以帮助进行治疗决策并为未来研究指明方向。这种处理“电生理状态性癫痫持续状态”的方法涵盖了IIC的五个维度:它不仅描述了周期性或节律性模式的发作期形态及其继发神经元损伤的潜在危害,还涉及“代谢印记”、临床影响和致痫潜力。最近的研究试图确定并界定特定IIC模式的发作期性质和致痫潜力(即后续急性发作的风险)及其内在脑电图特征。其他研究则将非惊厥性癫痫发作与死亡率之外的认知结果相关联;将非惊厥性癫痫发作以及散发性、周期性或节律性放电与脑病严重程度相关联;并将周期性或节律性模式的范围与可测量的继发性脑损伤相关联。在重症监护神经病学中经常会遇到IIC上模棱两可的周期性或节律性模式,临床医生通常会采用先进的神经影像学、代谢神经监测和抗癫痫药物短期试验,以评估这些模式。我们建议用多轴图来描绘IIC,以明确每种风险。沿每个轴进行量化可能有助于校准治疗紧迫性。一种适应性评分系统可评估在神经重症患者中,该频谱中的哪些准发作期脑电图模式可能达到抗癫痫药物升级的临界点。