Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Aug;29(1):3-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0477-5.
Continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring is becoming increasingly used in neurologic and non-neurologic intensive care units (ICUs). Non-convulsive seizures (NCSz) and periodic discharges (PDs) are commonly seen in critically ill patients. Some of these PD patterns, also known as the ictal-interictal continuum (IIC), are associated with an increased risk of seizures and poor outcome. However, we do not fully understand the significance of these periodic patterns and the decision of how aggressively to treat remains controversial. IIC patterns are associated with pathophysiologic changes that closely resemble those of seizures. Here we make the argument that, rather than feature description on EEG, associated changes in brain physiology should dictate management choices.
连续脑电图(cEEG)监测在神经科和非神经科重症监护病房(ICU)中的应用越来越广泛。非惊厥性发作(NCSz)和周期性放电(PDs)在危重病患者中很常见。这些 PD 模式中的一些,也称为发作-发作间连续状态(IIC),与癫痫发作风险增加和预后不良相关。然而,我们并不完全了解这些周期性模式的意义,如何积极治疗的决策仍然存在争议。IIC 模式与病理生理变化密切相关,这些变化与癫痫发作非常相似。在这里,我们认为,与其在脑电图上进行特征描述,不如根据脑生理学的变化来决定管理选择。