• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机辅助下的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:一位外科医生的学习曲线 一篇遵循STROBE规范的文章。

Computer-assisted, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One surgeon's learning curve A STROBE-compliant article.

作者信息

Xu Yun-Feng, Le Xiao-Feng, Tian Wei, Liu Bo, Li Qin, Zhang Gui-Lin, Liu Ya-Jun, Yuan Qiang, He Da, Mao Jian-Ping, Xiao Bin, Lang Zhao, Han Xiao-Guang, Jin Pei-Hao

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(27):e11423. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011423.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000011423
PMID:29979443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6076066/
Abstract

Minimally invasive (MI) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a challenging technique with a long learning curve. We combined computer-assisted navigation and MI TLIF (CAMISS TLIF) to treat lumbar degenerative disease. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve associated with computer-assisted navigation MI spine surgery (CAMISS) and TLIF for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Seventy four consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative disease underwent CAMISS TLIF between March 2011 and May 2015; all surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. According to the plateau of the asymptote, the initial 25 patients constituted the early group and the remaining patients comprised the latter group. The clinical evaluation data included operative times, anesthesia times, intraoperative blood losses, days until ambulation, postoperative hospital stays, visual analog scale (VAS) leg and back pain scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) values, Macnab outcome scale scores, complications, radiological outcomes, and rates of conversion to open surgery. The complexity of the cases increased over the series, but the complication rate decreased (12.00%-6.12%). There were significant differences between the early and late groups with respect to the average surgical times and durations of anesthesia, but no differences in intraoperative blood losses, days until ambulation, postoperative hospital stays, complication rate, VAS, ODI, Macnab outcome scale scores, or solid fusion rates. There was no need for conversion to open procedures in either group. Our study showed that a plateau asymptote for CAMISS TLIF was reached after 25 operations. The later patients experienced shorter operative times and anesthesia durations.

摘要

微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI TLIF)是一项具有挑战性的技术,学习曲线较长。我们将计算机辅助导航与MI TLIF(CAMISS TLIF)相结合来治疗腰椎退行性疾病。本研究旨在评估与计算机辅助导航MI脊柱手术(CAMISS)和TLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病相关的学习曲线。2011年3月至2015年5月期间,74例连续的腰椎退行性疾病患者接受了CAMISS TLIF手术;所有手术均由一名外科医生完成。根据渐近线的平稳期,最初的25例患者构成早期组,其余患者组成后期组。临床评估数据包括手术时间、麻醉时间、术中失血量、下床活动天数、术后住院时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)下肢和背部疼痛评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)值、Macnab疗效评定量表评分、并发症、影像学结果以及转为开放手术的比率。在这一系列病例中,病例的复杂性增加,但并发症发生率下降(12.00%-6.12%)。早期组和后期组在平均手术时间和麻醉持续时间方面存在显著差异,但在术中失血量、下床活动天数、术后住院时间、并发症发生率、VAS、ODI、Macnab疗效评定量表评分或坚固融合率方面无差异。两组均无需转为开放手术。我们的研究表明,CAMISS TLIF在25例手术后达到了平稳渐近线。后期患者的手术时间和麻醉持续时间较短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08d/6076066/7c64e95067e9/medi-97-e11423-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08d/6076066/7c64e95067e9/medi-97-e11423-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c08d/6076066/7c64e95067e9/medi-97-e11423-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Computer-assisted, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One surgeon's learning curve A STROBE-compliant article.计算机辅助下的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:一位外科医生的学习曲线 一篇遵循STROBE规范的文章。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(27):e11423. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011423.
2
Computer-assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better Than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease.计算机辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病可能优于开放手术。
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):237-242. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000165.
3
Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).一种复杂外科技术的学习曲线:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS TLIF)
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct;27(7):E234-40. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000089.
4
Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的学习曲线和临床结果:我们在 86 例连续病例中的经验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 15;37(18):1548-57. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318252d44b.
5
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗肥胖患者的临床疗效比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):644-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13794. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
6
Comparison of the short-term efficacy of MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF for the treatment of two-segment lumbar degenerative disease.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术与内镜下经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗两节段腰椎退行性疾病的短期疗效比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 4;25(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07815-1.
7
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:一位外科医生的学习曲线
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1460-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.045. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
8
Psychological and Functional Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的心理和功能比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun;13(4):1213-1226. doi: 10.1111/os.12986. Epub 2021 May 4.
9
Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.在一家三甲医院比较经皮内镜与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的初步临床疗效:经皮内镜术优于微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术吗?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:136-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.043. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].[经旁正中切口微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Oct;29(10):1253-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive workflow with optical navigation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中光学导航的综合工作流程:一项回顾性研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 21;20(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06111-5.
2
Beyond the Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Navigation Spine Surgery: Refinement of Outcomes With Extended Experience.超越机器人辅助导航脊柱手术的学习曲线:通过丰富经验优化手术效果。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 9;16(9):e69007. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69007. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Comparing trends and outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures: A retrospective analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Computer-assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better Than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease.计算机辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病可能优于开放手术。
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):237-242. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000165.
2
Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).一种复杂外科技术的学习曲线:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS TLIF)
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct;27(7):E234-40. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000089.
3
Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center.
比较微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)的手术趋势和结果:一项回顾性分析。
J Orthop. 2024 Jul 25;59:82-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.07.010. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.L4/5 Ⅰ度退变性腰椎滑脱症患者斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床与影像学比较。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(6):1477-1487. doi: 10.1111/os.13360. Epub 2023 May 8.
5
Determining the learning curve for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases.确定经皮内窥镜腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的学习曲线。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 12;18(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03682-z.
6
Does MIS-TLIF or TLIF result in better pedicle screw placement accuracy and clinical outcomes with navigation guidance?微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)或经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)在导航引导下是否能获得更好的椎弓根螺钉置钉准确性和临床结果?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 16;23(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05106-1.
7
The Clinical Impact of Image Guidance and Robotics in Spinal Surgery: A Review of Safety, Accuracy, Efficiency, and Complication Reduction.影像引导与机器人技术在脊柱外科手术中的临床影响:安全性、准确性、效率及并发症减少情况综述
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(s2):S10-S20. doi: 10.14444/8136. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
Time-demand, Radiation Exposure and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery With the Use of Skin-Anchored Intraoperative Navigation: The Effect of the Learning Curve.经皮固定术中导航辅助微创脊柱手术的时间需求、辐射暴露与结局:学习曲线的影响。
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 Feb 1;35(1):E111-E120. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001167.
9
Computer Navigation in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.微创脊柱手术中的计算机导航
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Dec;12(4):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09577-z.
与微创经椎间孔腰椎融合术相关的围手术期并发症:单中心204例腰椎不稳手术的评估
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2078-84. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.016. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
4
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:一位外科医生的学习曲线
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1460-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.045. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
5
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的比较:基于当前证据的荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1741-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2747-z. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
6
Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的学习曲线和临床结果:我们在 86 例连续病例中的经验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Aug 15;37(18):1548-57. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318252d44b.
7
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.经皮椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):1615-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c70fe3.
8
Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up.42例患者接受微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床及影像学比较:长期随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Dec;9(6):560-5. doi: 10.3171/SPI.2008.9.08142.
9
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术:评估初步经验。
Int Orthop. 2009 Dec;33(6):1683-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0687-8. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
10
The learning curve of minimally-invasive lumbar microdiscectomy.微创腰椎间盘切除术的学习曲线
Can J Neurol Sci. 2008 Mar;35(1):75-8. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100007599.