a School of Communication (619-594-8512) , San Diego State University , San Diego , CA , USA.
b Graduate School of Public Health (619-594-6317) , San Diego State University , San Diego , CA , USA.
J Health Commun. 2018;23(6):550-562. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1493057. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
The current study examined conversations on Twitter related to use and perceptions of e-cigarettes in the United States. We employed the Social Media Analytic and Research Testbed (SMART) dashboard, which was used to identify and download (via a public API) e-cigarette-related geocoded tweets. E-cigarette-related tweets were collected continuously using customized geo-targeted Twitter APIs. A total of 193,051 tweets were collected between October 2015 and February 2016. Of these tweets, a random sample of 973 geocoded tweets were selected and manually coded for information regarding source, context, and message characteristics. Our findings reveal that although over half of tweets were positive, a sizeable portion was negative or neutral. We also found that, among those tweets mentioning a stigma of e-cigarettes, most confirmed that a stigma does exist. Conversely, among tweets mentioning the harmfulness of e-cigarettes, most denied that e-cigarettes were a health hazard. These results suggest that current efforts have left the public with ambiguity regarding the potential dangers of e-cigarettes. Consequently, it is critical to communicate the public health stance on this issue to inform the public and provide counterarguments to the positive sentiments presently dominating conversations about e-cigarettes on social media. The lack of awareness and need to voice a public health position on e-cigarettes represents a vital opportunity to continue winning gains for tobacco control and prevention efforts through health communication interventions targeting e-cigarettes.
本研究考察了美国有关电子烟使用和认知的推特对话。我们使用了社交媒体分析和研究测试平台(SMART)仪表板,该平台用于识别和下载(通过公共 API)与电子烟相关的地理标记推文。使用定制的地理目标化推特 API 连续收集电子烟相关推文。2015 年 10 月至 2016 年 2 月期间共收集到 193051 条推文。在这些推文中,随机抽取了 973 条地理标记推文进行手动编码,以获取有关来源、背景和信息特征的信息。研究结果表明,尽管超过一半的推文是正面的,但相当一部分是负面或中立的。我们还发现,在那些提到电子烟污名化的推文中,大多数人证实确实存在污名化现象。相反,在提到电子烟危害性的推文中,大多数人否认电子烟对健康构成威胁。这些结果表明,目前的努力让公众对电子烟的潜在危险感到困惑。因此,至关重要的是要传达公众对这一问题的健康立场,以便为公众提供信息,并对目前主导社交媒体上关于电子烟对话的积极情绪提出反驳。公众对电子烟的认识不足以及需要表达公共卫生立场,这代表着通过针对电子烟的健康传播干预措施继续为烟草控制和预防工作赢得胜利的重要机会。