• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推特用户对薄荷醇香烟的认知:内容与情感分析

Perceptions of Menthol Cigarettes Among Twitter Users: Content and Sentiment Analysis.

作者信息

Rose Shyanika W, Jo Catherine L, Binns Steven, Buenger Melissa, Emery Sherry, Ribisl Kurt M

机构信息

The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, United States.

Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 27;19(2):e56. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5694.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.5694
PMID:28242592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5348619/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Menthol cigarettes are used disproportionately by African American, female, and adolescent smokers. Twitter is also used disproportionately by minority and younger populations, providing a unique window into conversations reflecting social norms, behavioral intentions, and sentiment toward menthol cigarettes.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to identify the content and frequency of conversations about menthol cigarettes, including themes, populations, user smoking status, other tobacco or substances, tweet characteristics, and sentiment. We also examined differences in menthol cigarette sentiment by prevalent categories, which allowed us to assess potential perceptions, misperceptions, and social norms about menthol cigarettes on Twitter. This approach can inform communication about these products, particularly to subgroups who are at risk for menthol cigarette use.

METHODS

Through a combination of human and machine classification, we identified 94,627 menthol cigarette-relevant tweets from February 1, 2012 to January 31, 2013 (1 year) from over 47 million tobacco-related messages gathered prospectively from the Twitter Firehose of all public tweets and metadata. Then, 4 human coders evaluated a random sample of 7000 tweets for categories, including sentiment toward menthol cigarettes.

RESULTS

We found that 47.98% (3194/6657) of tweets expressed positive sentiment, while 40.26% (2680/6657) were negative toward menthol cigarettes. The majority of tweets by likely smokers (2653/4038, 65.70%) expressed positive sentiment, while 91.2% (320/351) of nonsmokers and 71.7% (91/127) of former smokers indicated negative views. Positive views toward menthol cigarettes were predominant in tweets that discussed addiction or craving, marijuana, smoking, taste or sensation, song lyrics, and tobacco industry or marketing or tweets that were commercial in nature. Negative views toward menthol were more common in tweets about smoking cessation, health, African Americans, women, and children and adolescents-largely due to expression of negative stereotypes associated with these groups' use of menthol cigarettes.

CONCLUSIONS

Examinations of public opinions toward menthol cigarettes through social media can help to inform the framing of public communication about menthol cigarettes, particularly in light of potential regulation by the European Union, US Food and Drug Administration, other jurisdictions, and localities.

摘要

背景

非裔美国人、女性和青少年吸烟者对薄荷醇香烟的使用比例过高。少数族裔和年轻人群体使用推特的比例也过高,这为反映社会规范、行为意图以及对薄荷醇香烟态度的对话提供了一个独特的窗口。

目的

我们的目的是确定关于薄荷醇香烟的对话内容和频率,包括主题、人群、用户吸烟状况、其他烟草或物质、推文特征以及态度。我们还按流行类别研究了对薄荷醇香烟态度的差异,这使我们能够评估推特上关于薄荷醇香烟的潜在认知、误解和社会规范。这种方法可为这些产品的宣传提供参考,尤其是针对有使用薄荷醇香烟风险的亚群体。

方法

通过人工和机器分类相结合的方式,我们从2012年2月1日至2013年1月31日(1年)期间从推特全量公开推文和元数据的“推特消防水龙带”中前瞻性收集的4700多万条与烟草相关信息中,识别出94,627条与薄荷醇香烟相关的推文。然后,4名人工编码员对7000条推文的随机样本进行分类评估,包括对薄荷醇香烟的态度。

结果

我们发现47.98%(3194/6657)的推文表达了积极态度,而40.26%(2680/6657)的推文对薄荷醇香烟持消极态度。可能吸烟者发布的推文中,大多数(2653/4038,65.70%)表达了积极态度,而非吸烟者中有91.2%(320/351)以及曾经吸烟者中有71.7%(91/127)表示持消极看法。在讨论成瘾或渴望、大麻、吸烟、味道或感觉、歌曲歌词、烟草行业或营销的推文中,或者本质上是商业性质的推文中,对薄荷醇香烟的积极看法占主导。在关于戒烟、健康、非裔美国人、女性以及儿童和青少年的推文中,对薄荷醇的消极看法更为常见——这主要是由于与这些群体使用薄荷醇香烟相关的负面刻板印象的表达。

结论

通过社交媒体对公众对薄荷醇香烟的看法进行研究,有助于为薄荷醇香烟的公共宣传提供参考,特别是鉴于欧盟、美国食品药品监督管理局、其他司法管辖区和地方可能实施的监管。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8710/5348619/9a344de14359/jmir_v19i2e56_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8710/5348619/e7f9ef0248ca/jmir_v19i2e56_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8710/5348619/5685b598b24b/jmir_v19i2e56_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8710/5348619/9a344de14359/jmir_v19i2e56_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8710/5348619/e7f9ef0248ca/jmir_v19i2e56_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8710/5348619/5685b598b24b/jmir_v19i2e56_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8710/5348619/9a344de14359/jmir_v19i2e56_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of Menthol Cigarettes Among Twitter Users: Content and Sentiment Analysis.推特用户对薄荷醇香烟的认知:内容与情感分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 27;19(2):e56. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5694.
2
Using twitter to examine smoking behavior and perceptions of emerging tobacco products.利用推特研究吸烟行为及对新兴烟草产品的认知。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 29;15(8):e174. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2534.
3
Identifying Sentiment of Hookah-Related Posts on Twitter.识别推特上与水烟相关帖子的情感倾向。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Oct 18;3(4):e74. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8133.
4
Public Perception of the Tobacco 21 Amendment on Twitter in the United States: Observational Study.美国社交媒体上公众对烟草 21 修正案的看法:观察性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Sep 25;4:e53899. doi: 10.2196/53899.
5
Public Reactions to the New York State Policy on Flavored Electronic Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study.公众对纽约州电子烟调味政策的反应:推特上的观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Feb 3;8(2):e25216. doi: 10.2196/25216.
6
Applying Multiple Data Collection Tools to Quantify Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Communication on Twitter.应用多种数据收集工具量化推特上的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗传播情况
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 5;18(12):e318. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6670.
7
Social Listening: A Content Analysis of E-Cigarette Discussions on Twitter.社交倾听:对推特上电子烟讨论的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 27;17(10):e243. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4969.
8
E-Cigarette Advocates on Twitter: Content Analysis of Vaping-Related Tweets.电子烟倡导者在推特上:与蒸汽相关的推文的内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Oct 14;6(4):e17543. doi: 10.2196/17543.
9
"Okay, We Get It. You Vape": An Analysis of Geocoded Content, Context, and Sentiment regarding E-Cigarettes on Twitter.“好的,我们知道了。你吸电子烟”:关于推特上电子烟的地理编码内容、情境和情绪分析。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(6):550-562. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1493057. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
10
Geographic Differences in Cannabis Conversations on Twitter: Infodemiology Study.推特上关于大麻的讨论存在地域差异:一项信息流行病学研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Oct 5;6(4):e18540. doi: 10.2196/18540.

引用本文的文献

1
Large Language Models' Accuracy in Emulating Human Experts' Evaluation of Public Sentiments about Heated Tobacco Products on Social Media: Evaluation Study.大型语言模型在模拟人类专家对社交媒体上关于加热烟草制品的公众情绪评估方面的准确性:评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 4;27:e63631. doi: 10.2196/63631.
2
Uncovering a pseudoscience: an analysis of 'biological dentistry' Instagram posts.揭开一门伪科学:对“生物牙科”Instagram帖子的分析
Acta Odontol Scand. 2024 Apr 24;83:180-189. doi: 10.2340/aos.v83.40486.
3
Scanned information exposure and support for tobacco regulations among US youth and young adult tobacco product users and non-users.

本文引用的文献

1
Garbage in, Garbage Out: Data Collection, Quality Assessment and Reporting Standards for Social Media Data Use in Health Research, Infodemiology and Digital Disease Detection.输入垃圾,输出垃圾:健康研究、信息流行病学和数字疾病检测中社交媒体数据使用的数据收集、质量评估及报告标准
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 26;18(2):e41. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4738.
2
Using Twitter Data to Gain Insights into E-cigarette Marketing and Locations of Use: An Infoveillance Study.利用推特数据洞察电子烟营销及使用地点:一项信息监测研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Nov 6;17(11):e251. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4466.
3
Twitter users' reaction to a chain pharmacy's decision to end tobacco sales.
扫描信息暴露与支持烟草法规对美国青年和成年烟草制品使用者及非使用者的影响。
Health Educ Res. 2023 Sep 20;38(5):426-444. doi: 10.1093/her/cyad033.
4
An Analysis of Twitter Posts About the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Menthol Ban.关于美国食品和药物管理局薄荷醇禁令的 Twitter 帖子分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Apr 6;25(5):962-966. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac290.
5
#TurntTrending: a systematic review of substance use portrayals on social media platforms.#Turning Trends:社交媒体平台上物质使用呈现方式的系统评价
Addiction. 2023 Feb;118(2):206-217. doi: 10.1111/add.16020. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
6
Spread of gambling abstinence through peers and comments in online self-help chat forums to quit gambling.通过在线互助聊天论坛中的同伴和评论来传播戒赌。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):3675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07714-2.
7
Using Infodemiology Metrics to Assess Public Interest in Liver Transplantation: Google Trends Analysis.利用信息流行病学指标评估公众对肝移植的兴趣:谷歌趋势分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 17;23(8):e21656. doi: 10.2196/21656.
8
Canada's response to international travel during COVID-19 pandemic - a media analysis.加拿大在 COVID-19 大流行期间对国际旅行的反应 - 媒体分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 31;21(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11082-3.
9
Social Network Analysis of an Online Smoking Cessation Community to Identify Users' Smoking Status.对一个在线戒烟社区进行社交网络分析以确定用户的吸烟状况。
Healthc Inform Res. 2021 Apr;27(2):116-126. doi: 10.4258/hir.2021.27.2.116. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
10
Social Media as a Research Tool (SMaaRT) for Risky Behavior Analytics: Methodological Review.社交媒体作为风险行为分析的研究工具(SMaaRT):方法学综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Nov 30;6(4):e21660. doi: 10.2196/21660.
推特用户对一家连锁药店停止销售烟草这一决定的反应。
Tob Induc Dis. 2015 Nov 4;13:36. doi: 10.1186/s12971-015-0060-9. eCollection 2015.
4
Social Listening: A Content Analysis of E-Cigarette Discussions on Twitter.社交倾听:对推特上电子烟讨论的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 27;17(10):e243. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4969.
5
Hookah-Related Twitter Chatter: A Content Analysis.水烟相关的推特聊天:内容分析
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jul 30;12:E121. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150140.
6
Price-related promotions for tobacco products on Twitter.推特上与烟草产品价格相关的促销活动。
Tob Control. 2016 Jul;25(4):476-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052260. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
7
Tobacco smoking and all-cause mortality in a large Australian cohort study: findings from a mature epidemic with current low smoking prevalence.一项大型澳大利亚队列研究中的吸烟与全因死亡率:来自当前吸烟率较低的成熟流行情况的研究结果
BMC Med. 2015 Feb 24;13:38. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0281-z.
8
Twitter chatter about marijuana.推特上关于大麻的热议。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Feb;56(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.10.270.
9
Are you Scared Yet?: Evaluating Fear Appeal Messages in Tweets about the Tips Campaign.你害怕了吗?:评估关于提示活动的推文里的恐惧诉求信息。
J Commun. 2014 Apr;64:278-295. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12083.
10
Menthol cigarette smoking among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别成年人中吸薄荷醇香烟的情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.044. Epub 2014 Sep 19.