• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Differences In Care Between Special Needs Plans And Other Medicare Coverage For Dual Eligibles.特殊需求计划与其他医疗保险覆盖的双重资格人群之间的护理差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Sep;41(9):1238-1247. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00463.
2
Rapid Enrollment Growth In 'Look-Alike' Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans: A Threat To Integrated Care.“相似”双重资格特殊需要计划的快速入保增长:对综合护理的威胁。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Jul;42(7):919-927. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00103.
3
Special Needs Plans and the coordination of benefits and services for dual eligibles.特殊需求计划以及双重资格者的福利与服务协调。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):136-46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.136.
4
Effects of Early Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans on Health Expenditure.早期双重资格特殊需要计划对卫生支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2165-2184. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12778. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
5
Beneficiary Experience of Care by Level of Integration in Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans.双重资格特殊需求计划中整合水平的受益人护理体验。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241383. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1383.
6
Among dual eligibles, identifying the highest-cost individuals could help in crafting more targeted and effective responses.在双重资格者中,确定费用最高的人群可能有助于制定更有针对性和更有效的应对措施。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):1083-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0729. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
7
Psychiatrist and Nonpsychiatrist Physician Network Breadth in Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans.精神科医生和非精神科医生在双重合格特殊需求计划中的网络广度。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Aug 1;74(8):816-822. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220239. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
8
Enrollment And Characteristics Of Dual-Eligible Medicare And Medicaid Beneficiaries In Integrated Care Programs.参加整合照护计划的医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格受益人的登记和特征。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 May;42(5):683-692. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01321.
9
Nationwide Availability of and Enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans With Exclusively Aligned Enrollment.医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格特别需要计划的全国可用性和注册,其注册完全一致。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Oct 4;5(10):e243546. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3546.
10
The Effect of COVID-19 on Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries: A Scoping Review.COVID-19 对双重资格受益人的影响:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Oct;24(10):1565-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Disenrollment From Special Needs and Other Medicare Advantage Plans Among Nursing Home Residents.疗养院居民退出特殊需求及其他医疗保险优势计划的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2523973. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.23973.
2
Enrollment in Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans and Disenrollment Rates.双重资格特殊需求计划的参保情况及退保率。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251748. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1748.
3
Patient-Reported Characteristics Across Dual-Eligible Medicare Advantage Plan Types.双重资格医疗保险优势计划类型的患者报告特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5791.
4
Characteristics and Benefit Design of Veteran Medicare Advantage Affinity Plans.退伍军人医疗保险优势亲和计划的特点与福利设计。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Mar 7;6(3):e250159. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0159.
5
Outcomes for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries With Dementia in Special Needs Plans and Other Medicare Advantage Plans.特殊需求计划和其他医疗保险优势计划中患有痴呆症的双重资格受益人的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61219.
6
Association of Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare with Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized for Substance Use Disorders.医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险对物质使用障碍住院患者临床结局的影响
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09413-w.
7
Medicaid Spending in Coordination-Only Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.仅协调的双重资格特殊需求计划中的医疗补助支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455461. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55461.
8
How Specialized Are Special Needs Plans? Evidence From Provider Networks.特殊需求计划有多专业?来自医疗服务提供网络的证据。
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Feb;82(1):58-67. doi: 10.1177/10775587241296194. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
9
Should I stay or should I go again: Multiple switching between fee-for-service Medicare and Medicare advantage among older beneficiaries.我该留下还是再次离开:老年受益人群中按服务收费的医疗保险与医疗保险优势计划之间的多次转换
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14398. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14398. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
10
Beneficiary Experience of Care by Level of Integration in Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans.双重资格特殊需求计划中整合水平的受益人护理体验。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241383. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1383.

本文引用的文献

1
Opportunities to Address Health Disparities in Performance-Based Accountability and Payment Programs.在基于绩效的问责制和支付计划中解决健康差异问题的机遇。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 4;2(6):e211143. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1143.
2
Association of Medicare Advantage Star Ratings With Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Quality of Care.医疗保险优势星级评定与医疗质量的种族、民族和社会经济差异的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 11;2(6):e210793. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0793. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Aligning Medicaid and Medicare Advantage Managed Care Plans for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries.使医疗补助和医疗保险优势管理式医疗计划与双重资格受益人保持一致。
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):207-217. doi: 10.1177/10775587211018938. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
Do dual eligible beneficiaries experience better health care in special needs plans?双重资格受益人的特殊需求计划是否能获得更好的医疗保健?
Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun;56(3):517-527. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13620. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
Strange Bedfellows: Coordinating Medicare and Medicaid to Achieve Cost-Effective Care for Patients with the Greatest Health Needs.怪诞的盟友:协调医疗保险和医疗补助,为有最大健康需求的患者提供具有成本效益的护理。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):3671-3674. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05914-y. Epub 2020 May 27.
6
Incentivizing Excellent Care to At-Risk Groups with a Health Equity Summary Score.激励高危人群提供优质医疗服务的健康公平综合评分。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):1847-1857. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05473-x. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
7
Effects of Integrating Care for Medicare-Medicaid Dually Eligible Seniors in Minnesota.明尼苏达州医疗保险-医疗补助双重资格老年人整合护理的效果。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):31-54. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1485396. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
8
Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon.比较覆盖模式下的双重合格者护理:来自俄勒冈州的实证证据。
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Oct;76(5):661-677. doi: 10.1177/1077558717740206. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Passive Enrollment Of Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries Into Medicare And Medicaid Managed Care Has Not Met Expectations.双重资格受益人的被动加入医疗保险和医疗补助管理式医疗未达预期。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):846-854. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1082.
10
Medicare and Medicaid: conflicting incentives for long-term care.医疗保险和医疗补助:长期护理的激励措施相互冲突。
Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):579-610. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00502.x.

特殊需求计划与其他医疗保险覆盖的双重资格人群之间的护理差异。

Differences In Care Between Special Needs Plans And Other Medicare Coverage For Dual Eligibles.

机构信息

Eric T. Roberts (

Jennifer M. Mellor, William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Sep;41(9):1238-1247. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00463.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00463
PMID:36067441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9575653/
Abstract

Policy makers are pursuing strategies to integrate Medicare and Medicaid coverage for people enrolled in both programs, who are known as dual eligibles. Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs) are Medicare Advantage plans that exclusively serve this population, with several features intended to enhance care and facilitate integration with Medicaid. This study compared access to, use of, and satisfaction with care among dual eligibles enrolled in D-SNPs versus those enrolled in two other forms of Medicare coverage: other Medicare Advantage (MA) plans not exclusively serving dual eligibles and traditional Medicare. Compared with those in traditional Medicare, dual eligibles generally reported greater access to care, preventive service use, and satisfaction with care in D-SNPs. However, we found fewer differences in these outcomes among dual eligibles in D-SNPs versus other MA plans. Compared with non-Hispanic White dual eligibles, dual eligibles of color (for example, those identifying as Black or Hispanic) were less likely to report receiving better care in D-SNPs versus other Medicare coverage. These findings suggest that D-SNPs altogether have not provided consistently superior or more equitable care, and they highlight areas where federal and state policy could strengthen incentives for D-SNPs to improve care.

摘要

政策制定者正在寻求策略,将医疗保险和医疗补助计划覆盖范围整合起来,涵盖同时参加这两个项目的人群,这些人被称为双重资格者。双重资格特殊需求计划(D-SNPs)是专门为这一人群服务的医疗保险优势计划,具有几项旨在增强护理和促进与医疗补助计划整合的特点。本研究比较了参加 D-SNPs 的双重资格者与参加其他两种医疗保险覆盖形式(非专门为双重资格者服务的其他医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险)的双重资格者在获得、使用和对护理的满意度方面的差异。与传统医疗保险相比,双重资格者在 D-SNPs 中普遍报告获得更多的护理、预防服务使用和对护理的满意度。然而,我们发现双重资格者在 D-SNPs 与其他 MA 计划之间,在这些结果方面的差异较小。与非西班牙裔白人双重资格者相比,有色人种的双重资格者(例如,那些自认为是黑人或西班牙裔的人)不太可能报告在 D-SNPs 中比在其他医疗保险中获得更好的护理。这些发现表明,D-SNPs 并没有提供始终如一的优质或更公平的护理,并且突出了联邦和州政策可以加强激励措施,以促使 D-SNPs 改善护理的领域。