Suppr超能文献

特殊需求计划与其他医疗保险覆盖的双重资格人群之间的护理差异。

Differences In Care Between Special Needs Plans And Other Medicare Coverage For Dual Eligibles.

机构信息

Eric T. Roberts (

Jennifer M. Mellor, William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Sep;41(9):1238-1247. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00463.

Abstract

Policy makers are pursuing strategies to integrate Medicare and Medicaid coverage for people enrolled in both programs, who are known as dual eligibles. Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs) are Medicare Advantage plans that exclusively serve this population, with several features intended to enhance care and facilitate integration with Medicaid. This study compared access to, use of, and satisfaction with care among dual eligibles enrolled in D-SNPs versus those enrolled in two other forms of Medicare coverage: other Medicare Advantage (MA) plans not exclusively serving dual eligibles and traditional Medicare. Compared with those in traditional Medicare, dual eligibles generally reported greater access to care, preventive service use, and satisfaction with care in D-SNPs. However, we found fewer differences in these outcomes among dual eligibles in D-SNPs versus other MA plans. Compared with non-Hispanic White dual eligibles, dual eligibles of color (for example, those identifying as Black or Hispanic) were less likely to report receiving better care in D-SNPs versus other Medicare coverage. These findings suggest that D-SNPs altogether have not provided consistently superior or more equitable care, and they highlight areas where federal and state policy could strengthen incentives for D-SNPs to improve care.

摘要

政策制定者正在寻求策略,将医疗保险和医疗补助计划覆盖范围整合起来,涵盖同时参加这两个项目的人群,这些人被称为双重资格者。双重资格特殊需求计划(D-SNPs)是专门为这一人群服务的医疗保险优势计划,具有几项旨在增强护理和促进与医疗补助计划整合的特点。本研究比较了参加 D-SNPs 的双重资格者与参加其他两种医疗保险覆盖形式(非专门为双重资格者服务的其他医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险)的双重资格者在获得、使用和对护理的满意度方面的差异。与传统医疗保险相比,双重资格者在 D-SNPs 中普遍报告获得更多的护理、预防服务使用和对护理的满意度。然而,我们发现双重资格者在 D-SNPs 与其他 MA 计划之间,在这些结果方面的差异较小。与非西班牙裔白人双重资格者相比,有色人种的双重资格者(例如,那些自认为是黑人或西班牙裔的人)不太可能报告在 D-SNPs 中比在其他医疗保险中获得更好的护理。这些发现表明,D-SNPs 并没有提供始终如一的优质或更公平的护理,并且突出了联邦和州政策可以加强激励措施,以促使 D-SNPs 改善护理的领域。

相似文献

1
Differences In Care Between Special Needs Plans And Other Medicare Coverage For Dual Eligibles.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Sep;41(9):1238-1247. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00463.
2
Rapid Enrollment Growth In 'Look-Alike' Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans: A Threat To Integrated Care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Jul;42(7):919-927. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00103.
3
Special Needs Plans and the coordination of benefits and services for dual eligibles.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):136-46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.136.
4
Effects of Early Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans on Health Expenditure.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2165-2184. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12778. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
5
Beneficiary Experience of Care by Level of Integration in Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans.
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241383. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1383.
6
Among dual eligibles, identifying the highest-cost individuals could help in crafting more targeted and effective responses.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):1083-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0729. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
7
Psychiatrist and Nonpsychiatrist Physician Network Breadth in Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans.
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Aug 1;74(8):816-822. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220239. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
8
Enrollment And Characteristics Of Dual-Eligible Medicare And Medicaid Beneficiaries In Integrated Care Programs.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 May;42(5):683-692. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01321.
10
The Effect of COVID-19 on Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries: A Scoping Review.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Oct;24(10):1565-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Disenrollment From Special Needs and Other Medicare Advantage Plans Among Nursing Home Residents.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2523973. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.23973.
2
Enrollment in Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans and Disenrollment Rates.
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251748. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1748.
3
Patient-Reported Characteristics Across Dual-Eligible Medicare Advantage Plan Types.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5791.
4
Characteristics and Benefit Design of Veteran Medicare Advantage Affinity Plans.
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Mar 7;6(3):e250159. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0159.
5
Outcomes for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries With Dementia in Special Needs Plans and Other Medicare Advantage Plans.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61219.
7
Medicaid Spending in Coordination-Only Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455461. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55461.
8
How Specialized Are Special Needs Plans? Evidence From Provider Networks.
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Feb;82(1):58-67. doi: 10.1177/10775587241296194. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
9
Should I stay or should I go again: Multiple switching between fee-for-service Medicare and Medicare advantage among older beneficiaries.
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14398. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14398. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
10
Beneficiary Experience of Care by Level of Integration in Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans.
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241383. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1383.

本文引用的文献

1
Opportunities to Address Health Disparities in Performance-Based Accountability and Payment Programs.
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 4;2(6):e211143. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1143.
2
Association of Medicare Advantage Star Ratings With Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Quality of Care.
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 11;2(6):e210793. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0793. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Aligning Medicaid and Medicare Advantage Managed Care Plans for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries.
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Apr;79(2):207-217. doi: 10.1177/10775587211018938. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
Do dual eligible beneficiaries experience better health care in special needs plans?
Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun;56(3):517-527. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13620. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
5
Strange Bedfellows: Coordinating Medicare and Medicaid to Achieve Cost-Effective Care for Patients with the Greatest Health Needs.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):3671-3674. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05914-y. Epub 2020 May 27.
6
Incentivizing Excellent Care to At-Risk Groups with a Health Equity Summary Score.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):1847-1857. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05473-x. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
7
Effects of Integrating Care for Medicare-Medicaid Dually Eligible Seniors in Minnesota.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):31-54. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1485396. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
8
Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon.
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Oct;76(5):661-677. doi: 10.1177/1077558717740206. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Passive Enrollment Of Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries Into Medicare And Medicaid Managed Care Has Not Met Expectations.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):846-854. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1082.
10
Medicare and Medicaid: conflicting incentives for long-term care.
Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):579-610. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00502.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验