Braithwaite Jeffrey, Ellis Louise A, Churruca Kate, Long Janet C
Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3350-0.
While we have made gains in understanding cultures in hospitals and their effects on outcomes of care, little work has investigated how the pace of work in hospitals is associated with staff satisfaction and patient outcomes. In an era of efficiency, as speed accelerates, this requires examination.
Older studies of pace in cities found that faster lifestyles were linked to increased coronary heart disease and smoking rates, yet better subjective well-being. In this debate we propose the Goldilocks hypothesis: acute care workplaces operating at slow speeds are associated with factors such as increased wait lists, poor performance and costly care; those that are too fast risk staff exhaustion, burnout, missed care and patient dissatisfaction. We hypothesise that hospitals are best positioned by being in the Goldilocks zone, the sweet spot of optimal pace.
Testing this hypothesis requires a careful study of hospitals, comparing their pace in wards and departments with measures of performance and patient outcomes.
虽然我们在理解医院文化及其对护理结果的影响方面取得了进展,但很少有研究探讨医院的工作节奏与员工满意度和患者护理结果之间的关系。在一个追求效率的时代,随着工作节奏加快,这一问题需要进行审视。
早期关于城市节奏的研究发现,更快的生活节奏与冠心病发病率上升和吸烟率增加有关,但主观幸福感却更好。在这场讨论中,我们提出了“金发姑娘假说”:工作节奏缓慢的急症护理工作场所与诸如等待名单增加、表现不佳和护理成本高昂等因素相关;而那些节奏过快的工作场所则有员工疲惫、倦怠、护理失误和患者不满的风险。我们假设,医院处于“金发姑娘区”,即最佳节奏的理想状态时,情况最佳。
要验证这一假设,需要对医院进行仔细研究,将其病房和科室的工作节奏与绩效指标和患者护理结果进行比较。