Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK.
Institute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Eye (Lond). 2018 Nov;32(11):1697-1702. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0160-x. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
Although the worldwide prevalence of disseminated candidaemia is rising, reported intraocular candidiasis rates are variable, even as low as 1%. The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends fundoscopy screening for all fungal blood culture positive patients. We wished to evaluate the impact of this recommendation on our department.
A retrospective observational study was performed in NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (population = 1.15 million) for all patients with candida positive blood culture results over a 2-year period.
From January 2015 to December 2016, 258 candida positive cultures were obtained from 168 adults (mean age = 62 years, range: 17-94 years; 85 females, 83 males). Candida species were isolated in 161/168 (95.8%) cases (43.5% Candida albicans, 35.7% Candida glabrata). All 168 cases were treated with intravenous antifungals. 84 patients (50%) were formally referred to ophthalmology. Of those not referred, 21 were deceased prior to culture result (12.5%) and 14 patients subsequently deteriorated (8.3%). Six patients reported visual symptoms. In total, 65% had no ocular findings and 32.5% had unrelated ocular signs. Only one patient had signs consistent with Candida chorioretinitis, making the prevalence of intraocular candida in our population 1.3% (1/80).
The prevalence of ocular candidiasis is low, presumably due to potent systemic antifungal agents and good intraocular penetration. Our findings support the view that routine fundoscopy screening may not be indicated in every culture positive patient. This paper provides an evidence base for the Royal College's Eyecare in intensive care unit recommendations regarding targeted screening of non-verbal, symptomatic or high-risk patients.
尽管全世界播散性念珠菌血症的患病率正在上升,但报道的眼内念珠菌病的发病率却各不相同,甚至低至 1%。美国传染病学会建议对所有真菌血培养阳性的患者进行眼底镜筛查。我们希望评估这一建议对我们科室的影响。
在 NHS 大格拉斯哥和克莱德(人口=115 万)进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,对 2 年内所有念珠菌血培养阳性的患者进行了研究。
从 2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月,从 168 例成人中获得了 258 例念珠菌阳性培养物(平均年龄=62 岁,范围:17-94 岁;85 例女性,83 例男性)。在 161/168(95.8%)例(43.5%白色念珠菌,35.7%光滑念珠菌)中分离出了念珠菌。所有 168 例均接受了静脉用抗真菌药物治疗。84 例(50%)患者被正式转至眼科。在未转科的患者中,有 21 例在培养结果前死亡(12.5%),14 例患者随后病情恶化(8.3%)。有 6 例患者报告有视力症状。总共有 65%的患者眼部无异常发现,32.5%的患者有无关的眼部体征。只有 1 例患者有与念珠菌性视网膜炎相符的体征,因此,我们人群中眼内念珠菌的患病率为 1.3%(80 例中有 1 例)。
眼内念珠菌病的患病率较低,可能是由于使用了有效的全身抗真菌药物和良好的眼内穿透性。我们的发现支持这样一种观点,即并非每个培养阳性的患者都需要进行常规眼底镜筛查。本文为皇家学院关于对非言语、有症状或高危患者进行有针对性的筛查的眼保健 ICU 建议提供了证据基础。