Suppr超能文献

过度石灰处理和活性炭解毒对杨树预水解物中抑制剂去除及丁醇发酵的影响

Effect of overliming and activated carbon detoxification on inhibitors removal and butanol fermentation of poplar prehydrolysates.

作者信息

Zhang Yu, Xia Changlei, Lu Mingming, Tu Maobing

机构信息

Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Cincinnati, 2901 Woodside Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA.

出版信息

Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018 Jun 26;11:178. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1182-0. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biomass prehydrolysates from dilute acid pretreatment contain a considerable amount of fermentable sugars for biofuels production. However, carbonyl degradation compounds present severe toxicity to fermentation microbes. Furans (such as furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural), aliphatic acids (such as acetic acid, formic acid and levulinic acid) and phenolic compounds (such as vanillin and syringaldehyde) have been suggested to be the main inhibitors in biomass prehydrolysates. However, no single compound has been determined as the dominant toxic inhibitor. The effects of various detoxification methods on inhibitors removal have not been fully understood.

RESULTS

The effects of overliming and activated carbon (AC) detoxification on the removal of inhibitors and butanol fermentation of the poplar prehydrolysates were investigated. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) was used to identify and quantify 46 carbonyl compounds as potential inhibitors. It was observed that overliming and AC treatment alone did not make the prehydrolysates fermentable with . The sequential overliming and AC resulted in a remarkable fermentability and a high butanol yield at 0.22 g g sugar. The inhibitor removal in the prehydrolysates treated by overliming and AC was also examined by GC/MS. Overliming removed 75.6% of furan derivatives and 68.1% of aromatic monomers. In comparison, AC (5.0% ) removed 77.9% of furan derivatives and 98.6% of aromatic monomers. In addition, overliming removed much more 2,5-furandicarboxyaldehyde, 5-ethylfuran-2-carbaldehyde and 2,5-hexanedione than AC did. On the contrary, AC could remove considerably more phenolic acids than overliming. In the sequential detoxification, both dialdehydes/diketones and phenolic acids were extensively removed. This could be the main reason why the sequential detoxification enabled a remarkable ABE fermentation for the prehydrolysates.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that the effect of overliming and AC treatment on inhibitors removal was related to their chemical structures. Overliming removed more dialdehydes and diketones than AC treatment, while AC removed more phenolic acids than overliming. Sequential overliming and AC treatment were required to make the prehydrolysates fermentable with . The study also suggested different detoxification method was needed for ABE fermentation of the prehydrolysate as compared to ethanol fermentation.

摘要

背景

来自稀酸预处理的生物质预水解液含有大量用于生物燃料生产的可发酵糖。然而,羰基降解化合物对发酵微生物具有严重毒性。呋喃(如糠醛和羟甲基糠醛)、脂肪酸(如乙酸、甲酸和乙酰丙酸)和酚类化合物(如香草醛和丁香醛)被认为是生物质预水解液中的主要抑制剂。然而,尚未确定单一化合物为主要毒性抑制剂。各种解毒方法对抑制剂去除的影响尚未完全了解。

结果

研究了过石灰处理和活性炭(AC)解毒对杨树预水解液中抑制剂去除及丁醇发酵的影响。采用气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC/MS)鉴定和定量46种羰基化合物作为潜在抑制剂。观察到单独的过石灰处理和AC处理并不能使预水解液可用于发酵。过石灰处理和AC的顺序处理导致显著的发酵能力和0.22 g/g糖的高丁醇产量。还通过GC/MS检测了过石灰处理和AC处理的预水解液中抑制剂的去除情况。过石灰处理去除了75.6%的呋喃衍生物和68.1%的芳香族单体。相比之下,AC(5.0%)去除了77.9%的呋喃衍生物和98.6%的芳香族单体。此外,过石灰处理比AC去除了更多的2,5 - 呋喃二甲酸、5 - 乙基呋喃 - 2 - 甲醛和2,5 - 己二酮。相反,AC比过石灰处理能去除更多的酚酸。在顺序解毒过程中,二醛/二酮和酚酸都被大量去除。这可能是顺序解毒使预水解液实现显著ABE发酵的主要原因。

结论

本研究表明,过石灰处理和AC处理对抑制剂去除的效果与其化学结构有关。过石灰处理比AC处理去除更多的二醛和二酮,而AC比过石灰处理去除更多的酚酸。需要过石灰处理和AC的顺序处理以使预水解液可用于发酵。该研究还表明,与乙醇发酵相比,预水解液的ABE发酵需要不同的解毒方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5dd/6020205/11ffe4d5e860/13068_2018_1182_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验