Suppr超能文献

斯洛文尼亚老年人就地养老的长期护理服务可及性评估。

Evaluation of Access to Long-term Care Services for Old People Ageing in Place in Slovenia.

作者信息

Hlebec Valentina

机构信息

University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences, Kardeljeva pl. 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Zdravstvena pot 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Zdr Varst. 2018 Jun 21;57(3):116-123. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2018-0015. eCollection 2018 Jun.

Abstract

THEORY

The quality of long-term care services has an important effect on the quality of life of their users and their informal carers. By identifying gaps between provision of services and users' needs we can suggest adjustments of the long-term care services and advance their development.

METHOD

The data from the first Slovenian national survey of social homecare (SHC) users and their informal carers was utilised. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate factors that affect assessments of five-dimensional concept of access.

RESULTS

On average, affordability was rated the lowest (mean=2.9) and acceptability the highest (4.0), with availability, accessibility and accommodation (mean=3.6) in the middle. Regression analysis explains 15% of variability in affordability, while for other dimensions much less. Caregiver's needs are the most influential predictor of access, negatively influencing the rating of access (availability B=.127, accommodation B=-.113, acceptability B=-.120, affordability B=-.155). Care recipients' needs also affect the rating of affordability (B=-.132). Family income negatively influences the rating of availability (B=-.115), accessibility (B=-.076) and affordability (B=-.270). Residents of rural areas rate availability (B=-.070) and affordability (B=-.067) less favourable.

DISCUSSION

This study showed that affordability is rated the least favourable among components of access. Adjustment in private out-of-pocket co-payment mechanism is suggested.

摘要

理论

长期护理服务的质量对其使用者及其非正式护理人员的生活质量有重要影响。通过识别服务提供与使用者需求之间的差距,我们可以建议调整长期护理服务并推动其发展。

方法

利用了斯洛文尼亚首次全国社会家庭护理(SHC)使用者及其非正式护理人员的调查数据。采用线性回归分析来评估影响五维可及性概念评估的因素。

结果

平均而言,可负担性得分最低(均值 = 2.9),可接受性得分最高(4.0),可获得性、可达性和适应性得分居中(均值 = 3.6)。回归分析解释了可负担性方面15%的变异性,而在其他维度上解释的变异性要少得多。护理人员的需求是可及性最具影响力的预测因素,对可及性评分产生负面影响(可获得性B = 0.127,适应性B = -0.113,可接受性B = -0.120,可负担性B = -0.155)。受护理者的需求也会影响可负担性评分(B = -0.132)。家庭收入对可获得性评分(B = -0.115)、可达性评分(B = -0.076)和可负担性评分(B = -0.270)产生负面影响。农村地区居民对可获得性(B = -0.070)和可负担性(B = -0.067)的评价较低。

讨论

本研究表明,在可及性的各个组成部分中,可负担性的评价最低。建议调整私人自付费用机制。

相似文献

3
Determinants of Unmet Needs among Slovenian Old Population.斯洛文尼亚老年人口未满足需求的决定因素。
Zdr Varst. 2015 Dec 16;55(1):78-85. doi: 10.1515/sjph-2016-0011. eCollection 2016 Mar.

本文引用的文献

3
Determinants of Unmet Needs among Slovenian Old Population.斯洛文尼亚老年人口未满足需求的决定因素。
Zdr Varst. 2015 Dec 16;55(1):78-85. doi: 10.1515/sjph-2016-0011. eCollection 2016 Mar.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验