• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Blood pressure variability predicts adverse events and cardiovascular outcomes in SPRINT.血压变异性可预测 SPRINT 中的不良事件和心血管结局。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Sep;20(9):1247-1252. doi: 10.1111/jch.13346. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
2
Blood Pressure Variability Predicts Adverse Events and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Trial.血压变异性预测慢性肾脏病不良事件和心血管结局:SPRINT 试验的事后分析。
Am J Hypertens. 2017 Dec 8;31(1):48-52. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx128.
3
Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability predicts treatment-related adverse event of hyponatremia in SPRINT.SPRINT 研究中收缩压变异性与治疗相关低钠血症不良事件相关。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2017 Aug;35(4). doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12274.
4
Assessment of Risk of Harm Associated With Intensive Blood Pressure Management Among Patients With Hypertension Who Smoke: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.高血压患者强化血压管理相关伤害风险评估:收缩压干预试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190005. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0005.
5
Benefit and harm of intensive blood pressure treatment: Derivation and validation of risk models using data from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials.强化血压治疗的益处与危害:利用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)和控制糖尿病患者心血管风险行动(ACCORD)试验数据推导和验证风险模型
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002410. eCollection 2017 Oct.
6
Association Between Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure and the Efficacy of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure-Lowering Therapy.基础舒张压与强化降压治疗与标准降压治疗疗效的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128980. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28980.
7
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Acute Kidney Injury Events in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).强化血压治疗对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中急性肾损伤事件的影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Mar;71(3):352-361. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.021. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
Effectiveness of blood pressure-lowering treatment by the levels of baseline Framingham risk score: A post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).基于基线 Framingham 风险评分水平的降压治疗效果:SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)的事后分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Dec;21(12):1813-1820. doi: 10.1111/jch.13720. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
Legacy benefits of blood pressure treatment on cardiovascular events are primarily mediated by improved blood pressure variability: the ASCOT trial.血压治疗对心血管事件的遗留益处主要通过改善血压变异性来介导:ASCOT 试验。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Apr 1;45(13):1159-1169. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad814.
10
Individualising intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in hypertension using computational trial phenomaps and machine learning: a post-hoc analysis of randomised clinical trials.使用计算试验表型图谱和机器学习对高血压患者进行个体化强化收缩压降低治疗:随机临床试验的事后分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Nov;4(11):e796-e805. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00170-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability on cognitive function: state-of the-art.就诊间血压变异性对认知功能的影响:最新进展
Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2025 Aug 5;9:100392. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2025.100392. eCollection 2025.
2
Add-On Treatment With Zilebesiran for Inadequately Controlled Hypertension: The KARDIA-2 Randomized Clinical Trial.使用替尔泊肽附加治疗控制不佳的高血压:KARDIA-2随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.6681.
3
Impact of the National Essential Public Health Service Package on Blood Pressure Control in Chinese People With Hypertension: Retrospective Population-Based Longitudinal Study.国家基本公共卫生服务包对中国高血压患者血压控制的影响:基于人群的回顾性纵向研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Feb 6;11:e65783. doi: 10.2196/65783.
4
Cardiovascular Precision Medicine and Remote Intervention Trial Rationale and Design.心血管精准医学与远程干预试验:原理与设计
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 21;13(20):6274. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206274.
5
Hemodynamic phenotypes in chronic kidney disease patients based on linear regression of blood pressure parameters.基于血压参数线性回归的慢性肾病患者血流动力学表型
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Dec;26(12):1391-1401. doi: 10.1111/jch.14880. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
6
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure time in target range and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension and pre-frailty or frailty status.高血压伴衰弱前期或衰弱患者的目标范围内收缩压和舒张压时间与心血管结局。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 May;26(5):514-524. doi: 10.1111/jch.14797. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
7
Risk Factors of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients With Uraemia Complicated With Hypertension During Maintenance Haemodialysis Treatment.维持性血液透析治疗期间尿毒症合并高血压患者发生心脑血管事件的危险因素
Cureus. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e53411. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53411. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Impact of exercise training associated with enalapril treatment on blood pressure variability and renal dysfunctions in an experimental model of arterial hypertension and postmenopause.运动训练联合依那普利治疗对动脉高血压和绝经后实验模型中血压变异性和肾功能障碍的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 10;19(1):e0296687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296687. eCollection 2024.
9
Association of Urinary Potassium Excretion with Blood Pressure Variability and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Pre-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease.尿钾排泄与透析前慢性肾脏病患者血压变异性及心血管结局的关系。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 13;13(12):4443. doi: 10.3390/nu13124443.
10
Complications of White-coat Hypertension Compared to a Normotensive and Hypertensive Population.与血压正常和高血压人群相比,白大衣高血压的并发症
Heart Views. 2021 Jan-Mar;22(1):8-12. doi: 10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_64_20. Epub 2021 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Systolic Blood Pressure Variability With Mortality, Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Renal Disease.收缩压变异性与死亡率、冠心病、中风及肾脏疾病的关联
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 27;68(13):1375-1386. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.054.
2
Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.血压变异性与心血管疾病:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Aug 9;354:i4098. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4098.
3
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
4
Effects of calcium channel blocker-based combinations on intra-individual blood pressure variability: post hoc analysis of the COPE trial.基于钙通道阻滞剂的联合用药对个体内血压变异性的影响:COPE试验的事后分析
Hypertens Res. 2016 Jan;39(1):46-53. doi: 10.1038/hr.2015.104. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
5
Visit-to-Visit Variability of Blood Pressure and Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, Heart Failure, and Mortality: A Cohort Study.血压的就诊间变异性与冠心病、中风、心力衰竭及死亡率:一项队列研究
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):329-38. doi: 10.7326/M14-2803.
6
Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血压变异性与心血管疾病及全因死亡率的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertension. 2014 Nov;64(5):965-82. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03903. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
7
The design and rationale of a multicenter clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).一项比较两种收缩压控制策略的多中心临床试验的设计与原理:收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)
Clin Trials. 2014 Oct;11(5):532-46. doi: 10.1177/1740774514537404. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
8
The autonomic nervous system and hypertension.自主神经系统与高血压。
Circ Res. 2014 May 23;114(11):1804-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302524.
9
Effect of chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril on visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure: results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial.氯噻酮、氨氯地平和赖诺普利对血压逐诊间变异性的影响:抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验的结果
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 May;16(5):323-30. doi: 10.1111/jch.12290. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
10
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2014年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2014 Jan 21;129(3):e28-e292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

血压变异性可预测 SPRINT 中的不良事件和心血管结局。

Blood pressure variability predicts adverse events and cardiovascular outcomes in SPRINT.

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, Altru Health System, Grand Forks, ND, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Sep;20(9):1247-1252. doi: 10.1111/jch.13346. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1111/jch.13346
PMID:29984884
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8031192/
Abstract

SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) highlighted the benefits of intensive targeted antihypertensive therapy but resulted in higher rates of treatment-related adverse events. Blood pressure (BP) variability has emerged as a significant predictor of outcomes over and above levels of BP. Using the SPRINT data set, we aimed to determine the relationship of BP variability with cardiovascular outcomes and side effects of antihypertensive therapy. The analyses included all participants randomized in SPRINT who reached the target systolic BP (SBP) for their respective groups (intensive < 120 mm Hg; standard < 140 mm Hg). Coefficients of variation (CV) for SBP, diastolic BP (DBP), and PP for each patient characterized variability. Student t test was used to compare treatment arms for each CV metric. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent predictors of the SPRINT primary outcome and adverse events. P < .15 on univariate analysis was required to enter the model and P < .05 to remain in it. A total of 8884 patients (4561 standard group; 4323 intensive group) met inclusion criteria. DBP CV differed between the groups (9.12 ± 3.20 standard group; 9.47 ± 3.49 intensive group [P < .0001]). DBP CV predicted a greater hazard for the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14) in the overall model as well as separate analyses by treatment arms (standard group HR, 1.15; intensive group HR, 1.19), each P < .0001. DBP CV also independently predicted a greater hazard for acute kidney injury (HR, 1.12) and hypotensive events (HR, 1.12). Visit-to-visit DBP variability independently predicted worse cardiovascular outcomes and hypoperfusion-related adverse events in SPRINT.

摘要

SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)强调了强化靶向降压治疗的益处,但导致治疗相关不良事件的发生率更高。血压变异性已成为超过血压水平的重要预后预测因素。本研究利用 SPRINT 数据集,旨在确定血压变异性与心血管结局和降压治疗副作用的关系。分析纳入了所有达到各自分组目标收缩压(强化组 < 120mmHg;标准组 < 140mmHg)的 SPRINT 随机患者。每位患者的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和脉压(PP)变异系数(CV)用于描述变异性。学生 t 检验用于比较各 CV 指标的治疗组间差异。Cox 比例风险回归用于识别 SPRINT 主要结局和不良事件的独立预测因素。单因素分析中 P <.15 者进入模型,P <.05 者保留在模型中。共有 8884 例患者(标准组 4561 例,强化组 4323 例)符合纳入标准。两组间 DBP-CV 存在差异(标准组 9.12 ± 3.20;强化组 9.47 ± 3.49[P <.0001])。整体模型以及治疗组间的分析均显示,DBP-CV 预测主要结局的风险更高(风险比[HR],1.14),且差异均具有统计学意义(标准组 HR,1.15;强化组 HR,1.19;P <.0001)。DBP-CV 还独立预测急性肾损伤(HR,1.12)和低血压事件(HR,1.12)的风险更高。随访间 DBP 变异性独立预测 SPRINT 中较差的心血管结局和低灌注相关不良事件。