From the Department of Clinical Science and Education (A.B., N.N., M.G.), Södersjukhuset; Department of Neuroscience (D.R., J.G., U.P.A.), and Department of Oncology-Pathology (J.H.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Oct;85(4):717-724. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002013.
Uncontrolled hemorrhage is a leading cause of tactical trauma-related deaths. Hemorrhage from the pelvis and junctional regions are particularly difficult to control due to the inability of focal compression. The Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT) occludes aortic blood flow by compression of the abdomen. The survivability of tourniquet release beyond 120 minutes is unknown and fluid requirements to maintain sufficient blood pressure during prolonged application are undetermined. We therefore compared 60-minute and 240-minute applications and release of the AAJT for 30 minutes, with crystalloid fluid therapy, after a Class II hemorrhage.
Sixty-kilogram anesthetized pigs were subjected to 900-mL hemorrhage and AAJT application for 60 minutes (n = 5), 240 minutes (n = 5), and fluid therapy only for 240 minutes (n = 5) and reperfusion for 30 minutes.
The AAJT application was hemodynamically and respiratory tolerable for 60 minutes and 240 minutes. Cumulative fluid requirements decreased by 64%, comparable to 3000 mL of crystalloids. Mechanical ventilation was impaired. AAJT increased the core temperature by 0.9°C compared with fluid therapy. Reperfusion consequences were reversible after 60 minutes but not after 240 minutes. A 240-minute application resulted in small intestine and liver ischemia, persisting hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, and myoglobinemia, suggesting rhabdomyolysis.
The AAJT application for 240 minutes with reperfusion was survivable in an intensive care setting and associated with abdominal organ damage. Long time consequences and spinal cord effects was not assessed. We propose an application time limit within 60 minutes to 240 minutes, though further studies are needed to increase the temporal resolution. The AAJT application may be considered as a rescue option to maintain central blood pressure and core temperature in cases of hemorrhagic shock from extremity bleedings, if fluid therapy is unavailable or if the supply is limited.
Therapeutic study, level II.
无法控制的出血是战术性创伤相关死亡的主要原因。由于无法进行局部压迫,骨盆和交界区域的出血尤其难以控制。腹主动脉和交界部止血带 (AAJT) 通过压迫腹部来阻断主动脉血流。超过 120 分钟后松开止血带的存活率尚不清楚,并且在长时间应用期间维持足够血压所需的液体需求也不确定。因此,我们比较了在 II 级出血后应用 60 分钟和 240 分钟的 AAJT,以及应用 60 分钟和 240 分钟的 AAJT 后 30 分钟的释放,同时进行晶体液治疗。
60 公斤麻醉猪接受 900 毫升出血和 AAJT 应用 60 分钟(n = 5)、240 分钟(n = 5)和仅液体治疗 240 分钟(n = 5)和再灌注 30 分钟。
AAJT 应用 60 分钟和 240 分钟在血流动力学和呼吸方面是可耐受的。累计液体需求减少了 64%,相当于 3000 毫升晶体液。机械通气受到损害。与液体治疗相比,AAJT 将核心温度升高了 0.9°C。再灌注 60 分钟后后果是可逆的,但 240 分钟后则不可逆转。240 分钟的应用导致小肠和肝脏缺血,持续高钾血症、代谢性酸中毒和肌红蛋白尿,提示横纹肌溶解。
在重症监护环境中,240 分钟的 AAJT 应用再灌注是可以存活的,但与腹部器官损伤有关。没有评估长时间的后果和脊髓影响。我们建议在 60 分钟至 240 分钟内应用时间限制,尽管需要进一步的研究来提高时间分辨率。如果无法获得或供应有限,则 AAJT 应用可作为维持出血性休克患者(四肢出血)中心血压和核心温度的抢救选择。
治疗研究,II 级。