Division of Infectious Diseases, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC).
Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center, California.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 7;68(2):338-342. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy559.
The treatment of osteomyelitis in patients with stage IV sacral pressure ulcers is controversial. We conducted a systematic literature review and did not find evidence of benefit of antibacterial therapy in this setting without concomitant surgical debridement and wound coverage. Furthermore, many patients with chronically exposed bone do not have evidence of osteomyelitis when biopsied, and magnetic resonance imaging may not accurately distinguish osteomyelitis from bone remodeling. The goal of therapy should be local wound care and assessment for the potential of wound closure. If the wound can be closed and osteomyelitis is present on bone biopsy, appropriate antibiotic therapy is reasonable. We find no data to support antibiotic durations of >6 weeks in this setting, and some authors recommend 2 weeks of therapy if the osteomyelitis is limited to cortical bone. If the wound will not be closed, we find no clear evidence supporting a role for antibiotic therapy.
对于 IV 期骶部压疮患者的骨髓炎治疗存在争议。我们进行了系统的文献回顾,并未发现在此情况下不进行伴随性清创和伤口覆盖的情况下,使用抗菌治疗有益的证据。此外,许多慢性暴露骨的患者在活检时没有骨髓炎的证据,并且磁共振成像可能无法准确区分骨髓炎和骨重塑。治疗的目标应该是局部伤口护理和评估伤口闭合的潜力。如果伤口可以闭合并且骨活检显示存在骨髓炎,则合理使用适当的抗生素治疗。我们没有发现数据支持在这种情况下使用抗生素的时间超过 6 周,并且一些作者建议如果骨髓炎仅限于皮质骨,则使用 2 周的治疗。如果伤口无法闭合,我们没有发现明确的证据支持抗生素治疗的作用。