• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙语-英语双语儿童与英语单语儿童的鼻测量比较

Nasometric Comparison Between Spanish-English Bilingual and English Monolingual Children.

作者信息

Perry Jamie L, Kotlarek Katelyn, Mendez Lucia, Holt Yolanda, Fafulas Stephen, Broadwell Katie

机构信息

1 Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

2 Department of Modern Languages, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Mar;56(3):331-339. doi: 10.1177/1055665618786350. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1177/1055665618786350
PMID:29986147
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

It is well established in the literature that English diagnostic tests should not be directly applied to speakers whose primary language is Spanish. Normative nasalance data across word and sentence-level stimuli among Spanish-English bilingual children living in the United States have not been provided. The present study aims to (1) compare differences in nasalance between typically developing Spanish-English bilingual children and English-speaking monolingual children and (2) determine whether within-speaker nasalance differences exist in Spanish-English bilingual children when presented with English and Spanish speech stimuli.

DESIGN

Thirty-four typically developing children including 17 monolingual English speakers and 17 Spanish-English bilingual speakers with normal velopharyngeal anatomy between 5 and 7 years of age participated in the study. Speakers were recorded using a nasometer producing sets of stimulus items at the word and sentence level in English (English monolinguals) and in both Spanish and English for bilingual children.

RESULTS

Results indicated no statistically significant difference between nasalance values across the different stimuli between monolingual and bilingual participants. However, within-subject effects showed statistical significance between English and Spanish word stimuli among the bilingual group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings emphasize the importance of using language-specific diagnostic materials for nasalance testing, which would be of importance in the treatment of individuals with cleft palate.

摘要

目的

文献中已明确指出,英文诊断测试不应直接应用于母语为西班牙语的人群。目前尚未提供居住在美国的西班牙裔-英语双语儿童在单词和句子层面刺激下的标准鼻音数据。本研究旨在:(1)比较发育正常的西班牙裔-英语双语儿童与说英语的单语儿童在鼻音方面的差异;(2)确定西班牙裔-英语双语儿童在面对英语和西班牙语语音刺激时,其自身的鼻音差异是否存在。

设计

34名发育正常的儿童参与了该研究,其中包括17名单语英语使用者和17名5至7岁腭咽结构正常的西班牙裔-英语双语使用者。使用鼻音计对受试者进行录音,为英语单语者录制英语单词和句子层面的刺激项目,为双语儿童录制西班牙语和英语的刺激项目。

结果

结果表明,单语和双语受试者在不同刺激下的鼻音值之间无统计学显著差异。然而,双语组内受试者在英语和西班牙语单词刺激之间的效应具有统计学意义。

结论

这些发现强调了使用特定语言诊断材料进行鼻音测试的重要性,这对腭裂患者的治疗具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Nasometric Comparison Between Spanish-English Bilingual and English Monolingual Children.西班牙语-英语双语儿童与英语单语儿童的鼻测量比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Mar;56(3):331-339. doi: 10.1177/1055665618786350. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
2
Reliability and validity of nasality ratings between a monolingual and bilingual listener for speech samples from English-Spanish-Speaking children.单语和双语听众对英-西班牙语儿童语音样本鼻音评级的信度和效度
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2013;65(2):91-7. doi: 10.1159/000353809. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
3
Early-, middle-, and late-developing sounds in monolingual and bilingual children: an exploratory investigation.单语和双语儿童的早期、中期和晚期发展音:一项探索性研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Feb;19(1):66-77. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0036). Epub 2009 Jul 30.
4
Evaluating Nasalance Values Among Bilingual Mandarin-English Speakers.评估中英双语者的鼻音化值。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Apr;56(4):462-470. doi: 10.1177/1055665618791942. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
5
Frequency of mazes in an experimental narrative task in monolingual English and Spanish-English bilingual children.单语英语儿童和西班牙语-英语双语儿童在实验性叙事任务中迷宫的出现频率。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(6):547-569. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1563215. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
6
Development of the Children's English and Spanish Speech Recognition Test: Psychometric Properties, Feasibility, Reliability, and Normative Data.儿童英语和西班牙语语音识别测试的发展:心理测量学特性、可行性、可靠性和常模数据。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(4):860-877. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001480. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
7
Phonological acquisition in bilingual Spanish-English speaking children.双语西班牙语-英语儿童的语音习得。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Feb;53(1):160-78. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0064).
8
Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.模拟听力损失对双语儿童噪声中辅音识别的影响。
Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):e292-e304. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000428.
9
Speech Production Accuracy and Variability in Monolingual and Bilingual Children With Cochlear Implants: A Comparison to Their Peers With Normal Hearing.人工耳蜗植入的单语和双语儿童的言语产生准确性与变异性:与正常听力同龄人比较
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Aug 15;62(8):2601-2616. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0263. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
Voice onset time of voiceless bilabial and velar stops in 3-year-old bilingual children and their age-matched monolingual peers.3岁双语儿童及其年龄匹配的单语同龄人中清双唇塞音和软腭塞音的嗓音起始时间。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2012 Feb;26(2):148-63. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.595526. Epub 2011 Jul 25.