Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析成人社区获得性肺炎短期抗生素治疗的疗效。

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Short-Course Antibiotic Treatments for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Aug 27;62(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00635-18. Print 2018 Sep.

Abstract

The duration of therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains undefined. We sought to investigate whether short-course antibiotic treatment for CAP is associated with favorable clinical outcomes in adult patients. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies comparing the effectiveness and safety between treatment regimens administered for ≤6 days and ≥7 days. We defined treatment for ≤6 days as short-course treatment and treatment for ≥7 days as long-course treatment. Twenty-one clinical trials (4,861 clinically evaluable patients) were included, and 19 out of 21 trials were randomized. Clinical cure was similar between the compared groups (4,069 patients, risk ratio [RR] = 0.99 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.97 to 1.01]), irrespective of patient setting (RR = 0.98 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.00] for the outpatient setting and RR = 1.00 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.09] for the inpatient setting) or severity of pneumonia (RR = 1.05 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.14]). Also, relapses were similar between the short- and long-course treatment groups (1,923 patients, RR = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.46]). Short-course treatment was associated with fewer serious adverse events (1,923 patients, RR = 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.97]) and, importantly, resulted in lower mortality than long-course treatment (2,802 patients, RR = 0.52 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.82]). In CAP, short-course antibiotic treatment (≤6 days) is as effective as and potentially superior to, in terms of mortality and serious adverse events, longer-course treatment.

摘要

社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的治疗持续时间尚未确定。我们旨在研究 CAP 患者的短疗程抗生素治疗是否与良好的临床结局相关。我们系统地检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 ClinicalTrials.gov,以比较治疗方案≤6 天和≥7 天的有效性和安全性。我们将治疗≤6 天定义为短疗程治疗,治疗≥7 天定义为长疗程治疗。纳入了 21 项临床试验(4861 例可临床评估的患者),其中 21 项试验均为随机试验。比较组之间的临床治愈率相似(4069 例患者,风险比 [RR] = 0.99 [95%置信区间 {CI},0.97 至 1.01]),无论患者就诊环境(门诊就诊 RR = 0.98 [95% CI,0.96 至 1.00];住院就诊 RR = 1.00 [95% CI,0.92 至 1.09])或肺炎严重程度(RR = 1.05 [95% CI,0.96 至 1.14])如何。此外,短疗程和长疗程治疗组之间的复发率相似(1923 例患者,RR = 0.67 [95% CI,0.30 至 1.46])。短疗程治疗与较少的严重不良事件相关(1923 例患者,RR = 0.73 [95% CI,0.55 至 0.97]),重要的是,与长疗程治疗相比,死亡率更低(2802 例患者,RR = 0.52 [95% CI,0.33 至 0.82])。在 CAP 中,短疗程抗生素治疗(≤6 天)在死亡率和严重不良事件方面与长疗程治疗一样有效,甚至更有优势。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Antibiotic duration for common bacterial infections-a systematic review.常见细菌感染的抗生素使用疗程——一项系统评价
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Jan 29;7(1):dlae215. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae215. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验