• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗社区获得性肺炎的文献复习。

Short-course vs long-course antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia: A literature review.

机构信息

Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 May;124(5):550-559. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13205. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1111/bcpt.13205
PMID:30694600
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is well known that antibiotic use is the main driver for the increasing problems with resistant bacteria. Consequently, some countries have recommended shortening the duration of antibiotic treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the effectiveness of a short-course antibiotic is comparable to a longer course of antibiotics in adults with CAP and to assess whether the duration of an antibiotic course influences the development of resistant bacteria.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE. We included randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) comparing clinical success, microbiological efficacy, patient safety and antibiotic resistance in a short-course (5 days) vs a long-course antibiotic treatment (7+ days) for CAP.

RESULTS

Six RCTs were included. Clinical success rates were 87%-95% in patients treated with short-course antibiotics and 88%-94% in patients treated with a longer course. Eradication of pathogenic bacteria was found to be 100% and 95%-100% in patients treated with short-course and long-course antibiotics, respectively. No significant differences in adverse events were reported. However, none of the trials reported on the impact on the development of resistant bacteria.

CONCLUSION

Only few trials were included in this review and more RCTs are highly needed to be able to provide solid evidence for optimal treatment durations for patients diagnosed with CAP. Importantly, fluoroquinolones were often the drug of choice, and trials testing beta-lactam antibiotics, which are the type of antibiotics most often used in many European countries, should be aimed for in near future.

摘要

背景

众所周知,抗生素的使用是导致耐药菌问题日益严重的主要原因。因此,一些国家建议缩短社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的抗生素治疗疗程。本研究旨在探讨短期抗生素治疗与 CAP 成人患者的长期抗生素治疗相比是否具有等效疗效,并评估抗生素疗程的长短是否会影响耐药菌的产生。

方法

在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 中进行文献检索。我们纳入了比较短期(5 天)与长期(7+天)抗生素治疗 CAP 的临床疗效、微生物疗效、患者安全性和抗生素耐药性的随机对照试验(RCT)。

结果

纳入了 6 项 RCT。接受短期抗生素治疗的患者临床成功率为 87%-95%,接受长期抗生素治疗的患者临床成功率为 88%-94%。接受短期和长期抗生素治疗的患者分别有 100%和 95%-100%的患者清除了病原菌。未报告有不良反应的显著差异。然而,没有一项试验报告了对耐药菌发展的影响。

结论

本综述仅纳入了少数试验,需要更多的 RCT 来提供 CAP 患者最佳治疗疗程的可靠证据。重要的是,氟喹诺酮类药物通常是首选药物,应针对未来的试验检测β-内酰胺类抗生素,因为这类抗生素是许多欧洲国家最常使用的抗生素类型。

相似文献

1
Short-course vs long-course antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia: A literature review.短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗社区获得性肺炎的文献复习。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 May;124(5):550-559. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13205. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
2
Short-course versus long-course therapy of the same antibiotic for community-acquired pneumonia in adolescent and adult outpatients.青少年及成人门诊社区获得性肺炎患者使用同一种抗生素的短程与长程治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 6;9(9):CD009070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009070.pub2.
3
Efficacy of short-course antibiotic regimens for community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis.短疗程抗生素方案治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2007 Sep;120(9):783-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.04.023.
4
Short-course versus long-course antibiotic therapy for non-severe community-acquired pneumonia in children aged 2 months to 59 months.2至59个月大儿童非重症社区获得性肺炎的短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD005976. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005976.pub2.
5
Short- versus long-course antibacterial therapy for community-acquired pneumonia : a meta-analysis.社区获得性肺炎短疗程与长疗程抗菌治疗的荟萃分析
Drugs. 2008;68(13):1841-54. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868130-00004.
6
The optimal antibiotic treatment duration for community-acquired pneumonia in adults diagnosed in general practice in Denmark (CAP-D): an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.丹麦普通实践中诊断的成人社区获得性肺炎(CAP-D)的最佳抗生素治疗持续时间:一项开放标签、实用、随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08477-z.
7
Antibiotics for community acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients.成人门诊社区获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD002109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002109.pub2.
8
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Short-Course Antibiotic Treatments for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults.系统评价和荟萃分析成人社区获得性肺炎短期抗生素治疗的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Aug 27;62(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00635-18. Print 2018 Sep.
9
Short-course versus long-course intravenous therapy with the same antibiotic for severe community-acquired pneumonia in children aged two months to 59 months.针对2个月至59个月大儿童的重症社区获得性肺炎,使用同一种抗生素进行短疗程与长疗程静脉治疗的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 16(6):CD008032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008032.pub2.
10
Antibiotics for community acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients.成人门诊社区获得性肺炎的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD002109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002109.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
The optimal antibiotic treatment duration for community-acquired pneumonia in adults diagnosed in general practice in Denmark (CAP-D): an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.丹麦普通实践中诊断的成人社区获得性肺炎(CAP-D)的最佳抗生素治疗持续时间:一项开放标签、实用、随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08477-z.
2
Challenging management dogma where evidence is non-existent, weak, or outdated: part II.挑战无证据、证据薄弱或证据过时的管理教条:第二部分。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Nov;50(11):1804-1813. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07634-x. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Clinical Efficacy Protocol of Yinhuapinggan Granules: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, and Controlled Clinical Trial Program for the Intervention of Community-Acquired Drug-Resistant Bacterial Pneumonia as a Complementary Therapy.
银花平感颗粒临床疗效方案:一项用于干预社区获得性耐药细菌性肺炎作为辅助治疗的随机、双盲、平行对照临床试验方案
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 30;13:852604. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.852604. eCollection 2022.
4
"Antibiotic hardstop" on electronic prescribing: impact on antimicrobial stewardship initiatives in patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and infective exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (IECOPD).电子处方中的“抗生素硬停”:对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)感染加重患者抗菌药物管理计划的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 8;22(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07117-8.
5
Efficacy of Lianhua Qingwen Compared with Conventional Drugs in the Treatment of Common Pneumonia and COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis.连花清瘟与传统药物治疗普通肺炎和新冠病毒肺炎的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Sep 17;2020:5157089. doi: 10.1155/2020/5157089. eCollection 2020.
6
Two vs. three weeks of treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate for stabilized community-acquired complicated parapneumonic effusions. A preliminary non-inferiority, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.阿莫西林-克拉维酸治疗稳定期社区获得性复杂性肺炎旁胸腔积液两周与三周的疗效比较:一项初步非劣效性、双盲、随机对照试验
Pleura Peritoneum. 2020 Feb 26;5(1):20190027. doi: 10.1515/pp-2019-0027. eCollection 2020 Mar 1.