Suppr超能文献

使用踝部和腕部佩戴的加速度计分析肌强直性营养不良患者队列的行走速度。

Analyzing walking speeds with ankle and wrist worn accelerometers in a cohort with myotonic dystrophy.

机构信息

Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.

Institute of Cellular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Dec;41(24):2972-2978. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1482376. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

Abstract

Accelerometers are accurate tools to assess movement and physical activity. However, interpreting standardly used outputs is not straightforward for populations with impaired mobility. The applicability of GENEActiv was explored in a group of 30 participants with myotonic dystrophy and compared to a group of 14 healthy-controls. All participants performed a set of tests while wearing four different accelerometers (wrists and ankles): [1] standing still; [2] ten-meters walk test; [3] six-minutes walking test; and, [4] ten-meters walk/run test. Relevant findings were: [1] high intra-accelerometer reliability (i.e. 0.97 to 0.99;  < 0.001); [2] each test acceleration values differ significantly between each other; [3] no inter-accelerometer reliability between wrist-worn devices and ankle-worn; and [4] a significant difference between the myotonic dystrophy group and the healthy-controls detectable at each test (i.e. Left-ankle values at six-minutes walking test: 48±17 for the myotonic dystrophy group, vs, 74±16 for the healthy-controls;  < 0.001). GENEActiv demonstrated to be valid and reliable, capable of detecting walking periods and discriminating different speeds. However, inter-accelerometer reliability only applied when comparing opposite sides of the same limb. Specific movement characteristics of the myotonic dystrophy group were identified and muscle strength showed not to be a full determinant of limb acceleration.Implications for rehabilitationRehabilitation professionals in the field of neuromuscular disorders should be aware of the potential use of objective monitoring tools such as accelerometers whilst acknowledging the implications of assessing populations with altered movement patterns.Researchers should be cautious when translating accelerometry outputs previously validated in healthy populations to functionally impaired cohorts like myotonic dystrophy.Accelerometers can objectively expose movement disturbances allowing further investigations for the source of these disturbances.

摘要

加速度计是评估运动和身体活动的精确工具。然而,对于行动不便的人群,解释标准的输出并不简单。我们在一组 30 名肌强直性营养不良患者中探索了 GENEActiv 的适用性,并与 14 名健康对照组进行了比较。所有参与者在佩戴四个不同加速度计(手腕和脚踝)时进行了一系列测试:[1] 静止站立;[2] 十米步行测试;[3] 六分钟步行测试;和,[4] 十米步行/跑测试。相关发现包括:[1] 加速度计内的高可靠性(即 0.97 到 0.99; < 0.001);[2] 每个测试的加速度值彼此之间差异显著;[3] 手腕和脚踝佩戴的加速度计之间没有可靠性;[4] 在每个测试中都可以检测到肌强直性营养不良组和健康对照组之间的显著差异(即六分钟步行测试时左侧脚踝值:肌强直性营养不良组为 48±17,健康对照组为 74±16; < 0.001)。GENEActiv 被证明是有效且可靠的,能够检测到行走周期并区分不同的速度。然而,只有在比较同一肢体的相对侧时,加速度计之间才具有可靠性。确定了肌强直性营养不良组的特定运动特征,并且肌肉力量似乎不是肢体加速度的完全决定因素。

康复意义

神经肌肉疾病领域的康复专业人员应该意识到使用客观监测工具(如加速度计)的潜力,同时认识到评估运动模式改变的人群的影响。

当将以前在健康人群中验证过的加速度计输出值转化为肌强直性营养不良等功能受损队列时,研究人员应该谨慎。

加速度计可以客观地暴露运动障碍,从而可以进一步调查这些障碍的来源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f652/6900209/a5c9abac8e9f/IDRE_A_1482376_F0001_B.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验