Moroe Nomfundo F
School of Human and Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Dec;26(4):753-761. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1498183. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
. Complex interventions have been conducted in the field of public health to improve health at the individual, organizational policy or population level. In occupational audiology, hearing conservation programmes (HCPs), which are interventions to minimize or eliminate occupational noise-induced hearing loss, are currently not defined as complex interventions, despite them fitting the definition and features of complex interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to explore whether HCPs are a complex intervention, fitting the predefined criteria for complex interventions. . A qualitative, descriptive research design was conducted using three sources of data - document analysis, interviews and systematic review - to allow for triangulation. Data were collected through purposive sampling and qualitative content analysis was used. . This study confirmed that HCPs are a complex intervention founded on solid and consolidated theories. Therefore, these results paved the way for realist reviews to be conducted in the mining sector in South Africa in order to understand the mechanisms influencing the success or failure of HCPs locally. . The success of HCPs in the mining sector depends on conducting contextually evidence-based evaluations such as realist reviews which can provide policy-makers with contextual evidence for why certain programmes do or do not work in certain settings.
在公共卫生领域已开展了复杂干预措施,以在个体、组织政策或人群层面改善健康状况。在职业听力学中,听力保护计划(HCPs)作为旨在最小化或消除职业性噪声所致听力损失的干预措施,目前并未被界定为复杂干预,尽管它们符合复杂干预的定义和特征。因此,本研究旨在探讨HCPs是否属于复杂干预,是否符合复杂干预的预定义标准。
采用定性、描述性研究设计,利用三种数据来源——文献分析、访谈和系统评价——以进行三角互证。通过目的抽样收集数据,并采用定性内容分析法。
本研究证实,HCPs是基于坚实且稳固理论的复杂干预。因此,这些结果为在南非采矿业开展实效主义评价铺平了道路,以便了解影响当地HCPs成败的机制。
采矿业中HCPs的成功取决于进行基于情境证据的评估,如实效主义评价,这可为政策制定者提供关于某些项目在特定环境中为何有效或无效的情境证据。