• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耳鼻喉科培训中操作技能的直接观察

Direct Observation of Procedural Skills in Otorhinolaryngology Training.

作者信息

Kara Cüneyt Orhan, Mengi Erdem, Tümkaya Funda, Topuz Bülent, Ardıç Fazıl Necdet

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;56(1):7-14. doi: 10.5152/tao.2018.3065. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

DOI:10.5152/tao.2018.3065
PMID:29988299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6017203/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the experience on using direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) by trainees and trainers and to evaluate its use during the training process of Otorhinolaryngology (ORL) residency.

METHODS

This study was designed as a prospective educational research. For the quantitative assessment, the "construct validity" of the assessment tool was examined. For the qualitative assessment, the trainees and trainers' experiences regarding the use of DOPS in training process were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 55 DOPS assessment forms were filled during the study. The mean observation time was 7.14±4.83 (range: 1-20) minutes, and the mean feedback time was 2.11±2.01 (range: 0.5-10) minutes. A significant difference was detected between the first year trainees and the older ones, whereas no significant difference was observed between the third, fourth, and fifth year trainees. A statistically significant, positive correlation was found between the years of education and the average score. According to the results of the qualitative assessment, the trainees stated that they realized their technical inadequacy in some procedures and it helped them to improve their skills during their residency training. The trainers confirmed that they gave feedback after each assessment. Both the trainers and trainees suggested that specific guidelines should be prepared for every procedure.

CONCLUSION

DOPS is a useful, valid, and fair tool for assessing Otorhinolaryngology trainees. The data obtained from the DOPS forms can be used for demonstrating the success of a training clinic and to evaluate the training program.

摘要

目的

评估学员和培训师使用直接观察操作技能(DOPS)的体验,并评估其在耳鼻咽喉科(ORL)住院医师培训过程中的应用。

方法

本研究设计为一项前瞻性教育研究。对于定量评估,检验了评估工具的“结构效度”。对于定性评估,调查了学员和培训师在培训过程中使用DOPS的体验。

结果

研究期间共填写了55份DOPS评估表。平均观察时间为7.14±4.83(范围:1 - 20)分钟,平均反馈时间为2.11±2.01(范围:0.5 - 10)分钟。第一年学员与年长学员之间存在显著差异,而第三、四、五年学员之间未观察到显著差异。教育年限与平均得分之间存在统计学上显著的正相关。根据定性评估结果,学员表示他们意识到自己在某些操作中的技术不足,这有助于他们在住院医师培训期间提高技能。培训师证实他们在每次评估后都给予了反馈。培训师和学员都建议应为每个操作制定具体指南。

结论

DOPS是评估耳鼻咽喉科培训学员的一种有用、有效且公平的工具。从DOPS表格获得的数据可用于展示培训诊所的成功情况并评估培训项目。

相似文献

1
Direct Observation of Procedural Skills in Otorhinolaryngology Training.耳鼻喉科培训中操作技能的直接观察
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;56(1):7-14. doi: 10.5152/tao.2018.3065. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
2
Perception of the Use of the Direct Observation of Procedural Skills in Occupational Therapy Postgraduate Year Training in Taiwan: Survey of the Perspectives of Trainees and Supervisors.台湾职业治疗研究生培训中对直接观察程序技能使用的看法:学员和导师观点的调查。
Occup Ther Int. 2023 May 24;2023:8013086. doi: 10.1155/2023/8013086. eCollection 2023.
3
Review of the validity of DOPS as an assessment tool for the procedural skills of surgical trainees.手术培训生程序性技能的 DOPS 评估工具的有效性评价。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Sep;105(7):599-606. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0052. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Supervised learning events: direct observation of procedural skills pilot.监督学习活动:程序技能试点的直接观察
Occup Med (Lond). 2016 Nov 1;66(8):656-661. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqw090.
5
Work-Based Assessments in Higher General Surgical Training Program: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Trainers' and Trainees' Views and Experiences.普通外科高级培训项目中的基于工作的评估:一项探索培训师和学员观点及经验的混合方法研究
Surg J (N Y). 2020 Mar 9;6(1):e49-e61. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708062. eCollection 2020 Jan.
6
Trainers' perceptions of the direct observation of practical skills assessment in histopathology training: a qualitative pilot study.培训师对组织学实践技能评估直接观察的看法:一项定性试点研究。
J Clin Pathol. 2012 Jun;65(6):538-40. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200682. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
7
Paediatric Colonoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills: Evidence of Validity and Competency Development.儿科结肠镜检查术操作技能的直接观察:有效性和能力发展的证据。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 Jul;69(1):18-23. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002321.
8
Introduction of Directly Observed Procedural Skills (DOPS) as a Part of Competency-Based Medical Education in Otorhinolaryngology.引入直接观察程序技能(DOPS)作为耳鼻喉科基于胜任力的医学教育的一部分。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jun;71(2):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01624-y. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
9
Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in diagnostic gastroscopy: nationwide evidence of validity and competency development during training.诊断性胃镜操作技能的直接观察评估(DOPS):全国范围内培训期间有效性和能力发展的证据。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06737-7. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
10
The Effect of Repeated Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (R-DOPS) Assessment Method on the Clinical Skills of Anesthesiology Residents.重复直接观察操作技能(R-DOPS)评估方法对麻醉科住院医师临床技能的影响。
Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jan 24;11(1):e111074. doi: 10.5812/aapm.111074. eCollection 2021 Feb.

引用本文的文献

1
Image-based and textbook-based virtual reality training on operational skills among junior residents: a proof of concept study.基于图像和教科书的初级住院医师操作技能虚拟现实培训:一项概念验证研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 7;25(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07245-0.
2
Development and Integration of DOPS as Formative Tests in Head and Neck Ultrasound Education: Proof of Concept Study for Exploration of Perceptions.将直接观察操作技能评估(DOPS)开发并整合为头颈超声教育中的形成性测试:探索认知的概念验证研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 10;13(4):661. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040661.
3
Comparison of the effect of 360° versus two-dimensional virtual reality video on history taking and physical examination skills learning among undergraduate medical students: a randomized controlled trial.360°与二维虚拟现实视频对本科医学生病史采集和体格检查技能学习效果的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Virtual Real. 2023;27(2):637-650. doi: 10.1007/s10055-022-00664-0. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
Introduction of Directly Observed Procedural Skills (DOPS) as a Part of Competency-Based Medical Education in Otorhinolaryngology.引入直接观察程序技能(DOPS)作为耳鼻喉科基于胜任力的医学教育的一部分。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jun;71(2):161-166. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01624-y. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
5
Adaptation of "Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills" for Adenotonsillectomy into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study.《“技术技能客观结构化评估”在腺样体扁桃体切除术中的改编:土耳其语版的效度与信度研究》
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;57(1):7-13. doi: 10.5152/tao.2019.3681. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of formative evaluation using direct observation of procedural skills in assessment of postgraduate students of obstetrics and gynecology: Prospective study.在妇产科研究生评估中使用直接观察操作技能进行形成性评估的效果:前瞻性研究。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Jan;5(1):1-5.
2
Profiling postgraduate workplace-based assessment implementation in Ireland: a retrospective cohort study.爱尔兰研究生基于工作场所评估实施情况剖析:一项回顾性队列研究
Springerplus. 2016 Feb 20;5:133. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1748-x. eCollection 2016.
3
Surgical Trainers' Experience and Perspectives on Workplace-Based Assessments.外科培训师对基于工作场所评估的经验与看法。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):979-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 May 14.
4
Work-based assessments: making the transition from participation to engagement.基于工作的评估:从参与到投入的转变。
JRSM Open. 2014 Feb 26;5(3):2042533313515861. doi: 10.1177/2042533313515861. eCollection 2014 Mar.
5
Does direct observation of procedural skills reflect trainee's progress in otolaryngology?对操作技能的直接观察能否反映耳鼻喉科实习生的进步?
Clin Otolaryngol. 2014 Jun;39(3):169-73. doi: 10.1111/coa.12251.
6
Getting lost in translation? Workplace based assessments in surgical training.在翻译中迷失?手术培训中的基于工作场所的评估。
Surgeon. 2013 Oct;11(5):286-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
7
Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review.观察工具在操作技能评估中的应用:系统评价。
Am J Surg. 2011 Oct;202(4):469-480.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.020. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
8
Evaluating the utility of workplace-based assessment tools for speciality training.评估基于工作场所的评估工具在专业培训中的效用。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Dec;24(6):767-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
9
Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31.基于工作场所的评估作为一种教育工具:AMEE 指南第 31 号。
Med Teach. 2007 Nov;29(9):855-71. doi: 10.1080/01421590701775453.