Weimer Johannes Matthias, Rink Maximilian, Müller Lukas, Dirks Klaus, Ille Carlotta, Bozzato Alessandro, Sproll Christoph, Weimer Andreas Michael, Neubert Christian, Buggenhagen Holger, Ernst Benjamin Philipp, Symeou Luisa, Lorenz Liv Annebritt, Hollinderbäumer Anke, Künzel Julian
Rudolf Frey Teaching Department, Mainz University Hospital, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Regensburg University Hospital, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 10;13(4):661. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040661.
In Germany, progress assessments in head and neck ultrasonography training have been carried out mainly theoretically and lack standardisation. Thus, quality assurance and comparisons between certified courses from various course providers are difficult. This study aimed to develop and integrate a direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) in head and neck ultrasound education and explore the perceptions of both participants and examiners. Five DOPS tests oriented towards assessing basic skills were developed for certified head and neck ultrasound courses on national standards. DOPS tests were completed by 76 participants from basic and advanced ultrasound courses ( = 168 documented DOPS tests) and evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale. Ten examiners performed and evaluated the DOPS after detailed training. The variables of "general aspects" (6.0 Scale Points (SP) vs. 5.9 SP; = 0.71), "test atmosphere" (6.3 SP vs. 6.4 SP; = 0.92), and "test task setting" (6.2 SP vs. 5.9 SP; = 0.12) were positively evaluated by all participants and examiners. There were no significant differences between a basic and advanced course in relation to the overall results of DOPS tests ( = 0.81). Regardless of the courses, there were significant differences in the total number of points achieved between individual DOPS tests. DOPS tests are accepted by participants and examiners as an assessment tool in head and neck ultrasound education. In view of the trend toward "competence-based" teaching, this type of test format should be applied and validated in the future.
在德国,头颈部超声检查培训的进展评估主要在理论层面进行,且缺乏标准化。因此,质量保证以及不同课程提供商的认证课程之间的比较都很困难。本研究旨在开发并整合头颈部超声教育中的操作技能直接观察法(DOPS),并探究参与者和考官的看法。针对符合国家标准的头颈部超声认证课程,开发了五项旨在评估基本技能的DOPS测试。76名基础和高级超声课程的参与者完成了DOPS测试(共记录168次DOPS测试),并使用7点李克特量表进行评估。十名考官在经过详细培训后进行并评估了DOPS。所有参与者和考官对“总体方面”(6.0量表分对5.9量表分;P = 0.71)、“测试氛围”(6.3量表分对6.4量表分;P = 0.92)和“测试任务设置”(6.2量表分对5.9量表分;P = 0.12)等变量给予了积极评价。DOPS测试的总体结果在基础课程和高级课程之间没有显著差异(P = 0.81)。无论课程如何,各个DOPS测试之间获得的总分存在显著差异。DOPS测试被参与者和考官接受为头颈部超声教育中的一种评估工具。鉴于“基于能力”教学的趋势,这种测试形式未来应得到应用和验证。