Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Int Immunopharmacol. 2018 Sep;62:46-58. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.06.020. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
Numerous biologics are currently licensed for the treatment of psoriasis, including new drugs targeting interleukin-17 (IL-17) and interleukin-23 (IL-23). This meta-analysis evaluated the short-term (12-16 weeks) efficacy and safety of biologics targeting IL-17 and IL-23 in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Twenty-one randomized clinical trials met the defined inclusion criteria. Our results showed that Ixekizumab (160 mg wk0 + 80 mg q2w) had the greatest probability of achieving both PASI 75 (RR 21.32, 95% CI 15.48-29.36, P < 0.00001) and PASI 90 response (RR 59.76, 95% CI 32.41-110.19, P < 0.00001) at the primary endpoint times, followed by Ustekinumab and Secukinumab. Regarding the safety profile, Tildtakizumab (200 mg, q4w) was safest (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99, P = 0.04), while Ixekizumab (160 mg wk0 + 80 mg q2w) showed highest risk for one or more AE (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15-1.38, P < 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference between the two biologics regarding one or more SAEs. Comparing to the biologics targeting IL-23, the pooled effect size favored the biological agents targeting IL-17 in terms of the PASI 75 (PASI 75: RR 17.28, 95% CI 14.51-20.58, P < 0.00001) and PASI 90 (RR 37.19, 95% CI 26.91-51.41, P < 0.00001). The rate of overall AEs was significantly higher (P < 0.00001) in biologics targeting the IL-17 (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.24, P < 0.00001) compared to biologics targeting IL-23 (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1.04, P = 0.44), and with respect to one or more SAEs, no difference was seen between biologics targeting IL-17 and IL-23. This meta-analysis found that Ixekizumab was the most effective short-term treatment, but was ranked as the most risk therapeutic choice among the biologics involved in this study, while Tildtakizumab was the best alternative in the case of safety. Furthermore, it demonstrated that biologics inhibiting IL-17 were superior to biologics targeting IL-23 in terms of the efficacy, but posed higher risk at the same time. This study might help the clinicians and guideline developers to choose the optimal one among these biologics for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
目前有许多生物制剂可用于治疗银屑病,包括针对白细胞介素-17(IL-17)和白细胞介素-23(IL-23)的新药。这项荟萃分析评估了针对 IL-17 和 IL-23 的生物制剂在治疗中重度斑块状银屑病的短期(12-16 周)疗效和安全性。21 项随机临床试验符合既定纳入标准。我们的研究结果表明,Ixekizumab(160mgwk0+80mgq2w)在主要终点时间达到 PASI75(RR21.32,95%CI15.48-29.36,P<0.00001)和 PASI90 应答(RR59.76,95%CI32.41-110.19,P<0.00001)的可能性最大,其次是 Ustekinumab 和 Secukinumab。关于安全性概况,Tildtakizumab(200mg,q4w)是最安全的(RR0.88,95%CI0.78-0.99,P=0.04),而 Ixekizumab(160mgwk0+80mgq2w)显示出发生一个或多个 AE 的最高风险(RR1.26,95%CI1.15-1.38,P<0.00001)。然而,两种生物制剂在一个或多个严重不良事件方面没有显著差异。与针对 IL-23 的生物制剂相比,针对 IL-17 的生物制剂在 PASI75(PASI75:RR17.28,95%CI14.51-20.58,P<0.00001)和 PASI90(RR37.19,95%CI26.91-51.41,P<0.00001)方面的疗效优势更大。总体不良事件发生率明显更高(P<0.00001),针对 IL-17 的生物制剂(RR1.18,95%CI1.12-1.24,P<0.00001)高于针对 IL-23 的生物制剂(RR0.97,95%CI0.91-1.04,P=0.44),而在一个或多个严重不良事件方面,针对 IL-17 和 IL-23 的生物制剂之间没有差异。这项荟萃分析发现,Ixekizumab 是最有效的短期治疗方法,但在本研究中涉及的生物制剂中被列为风险最高的治疗选择,而 Tildtakizumab 在安全性方面是最佳选择。此外,它表明,针对 IL-17 的生物制剂在疗效方面优于针对 IL-23 的生物制剂,但同时存在更高的风险。本研究可能有助于临床医生和指南制定者在这些生物制剂中为中重度斑块状银屑病的治疗选择最佳药物。