Suppr超能文献

比较白细胞介素-17抑制剂治疗中重度银屑病的疗效和安全性:一项随机双盲试验研究及文献综述

Comparing the efficacy and safety of IL-17 inhibitors for treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a randomized double blind pilot study with a review of literature.

作者信息

AlMutairi Nawaf, Eassa Bayoumy Ibrahim

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait.

Department of Dermatology, Farwaniya Hospital, Kuwait.

出版信息

Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2021 Apr;38(2):281-288. doi: 10.5114/ada.2019.91496. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease in which interleukin-17A (IL-17A) has been found to play an important role. Commercially available anti-IL-17 drugs include brodalumab, ixekizumab (IXE), and secukinumab (SEC).

AIM

To compare the safety and efficacy of IXE and SEC in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The patients were randomized to the IXE or SEC group. Effectiveness was estimated by Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Safety was assessed by documentation of adverse effects (AEs), routine laboratory values, and injection-site and allergic reactions.

RESULTS

There were 155 patients in the IXE group and 158 in the SEC group. At week 12, PASI 75 was 76.77% (IXE) vs. 67.09% (SEC); PASI 90 42.58% (IXE) vs. 32.28% (SEC); PGA score of 0 or 1 at week 40 (79.52% vs. 74.4%) and at week 52 (61.83% vs. 58.12%) ( < 0.001). Also, DLQI score improvement was more pronounced in the IXE group. The rates and types of AEs were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both groups demonstrated a robust clinical response, a significant improvement in patient quality of life, and a satisfactory safety profile, the IXE group scored a notch higher.

摘要

引言

银屑病是一种慢性皮肤病,已发现白细胞介素 - 17A(IL - 17A)在其中起重要作用。市售的抗IL - 17药物包括布罗达单抗、司库奇尤单抗(SEC)和依奇珠单抗(IXE)。

目的

比较IXE和SEC治疗中重度斑块状银屑病患者的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

将患者随机分为IXE组或SEC组。通过医生整体评估(PGA)、银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)以及皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评估疗效。通过记录不良反应(AE)、常规实验室值以及注射部位和过敏反应来评估安全性。

结果

IXE组有155例患者,SEC组有158例患者。在第12周时,达到PASI 75的比例为76.77%(IXE)对67.09%(SEC);达到PASI 90的比例为42.58%(IXE)对32.28%(SEC);在第40周(79.52%对74.4%)和第52周(61.83%对58.12%)时PGA评分为0或1(P < 0.001)。此外,IXE组的DLQI评分改善更为明显。两组的AE发生率和类型相似。

结论

虽然两组均表现出强劲的临床反应、患者生活质量显著改善以及令人满意的安全性,但IXE组得分略高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c74c/9880774/195735a7c3e6/PDIA-38-39535-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验