School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China; Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba-City, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan.
College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Environ Int. 2018 Oct;119:309-318. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
Climate change mitigation involves reducing fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, which is expensive, particularly under stringent mitigation targets. The co-benefits of reducing air pollutants and improving human health are often ignored, but can play significant roles in decision-making. In this study, we quantified the co-benefits of climate change mitigation on ambient air quality and human health in both physical and monetary terms with a particular focus on Asia, where air quality will likely be degraded in the next few decades if mitigation measures are not undertaken. We used an integrated assessment framework that incorporated economic, air chemistry transport, and health assessment models. Air pollution reduction through climate change mitigation under the 2 °C goal could reduce premature deaths in Asia by 0.79 million (95% confidence interval: 0.75-1.8 million) by 2050. This co-benefit is equivalent to a life value savings of approximately 2.8 trillion United States dollars (USD) (6% of the gross domestic product [GDP]), which is decidedly more than the climate mitigation cost (840 billion USD, 2% of GDP). At the national level, India has the highest potential net benefit of 1.4 trillion USD, followed by China (330 billion USD) and Japan (68 billion USD). Furthermore, in most Asian countries, per capita GDP gain and life value savings would increase with per capita GDP increasing. We robustly confirmed this qualitative conclusion under several socioeconomic and exposure-response function assumptions.
气候变化减缓措施涉及减少化石燃料消耗和温室气体排放,这是昂贵的,特别是在严格的减缓目标下。减少空气污染物和改善人类健康的共同效益经常被忽视,但可以在决策中发挥重要作用。在这项研究中,我们从物质和货币两个方面量化了气候变化减缓对环境空气质量和人类健康的共同效益,特别关注亚洲,如果不采取减缓措施,亚洲未来几十年空气质量可能会恶化。我们使用了一个综合评估框架,该框架结合了经济、空气化学传输和健康评估模型。在 2°C 目标下,通过气候变化减缓措施减少空气污染,可以在 2050 年前减少亚洲地区 79 万人(95%置信区间:75 万至 180 万人)的过早死亡。这种共同效益相当于约 2.8 万亿美元(占国内生产总值的 6%)的生命价值节省,这显然超过了气候减缓成本(8400 亿美元,占国内生产总值的 2%)。在国家层面上,印度的潜在净效益最高,为 1.4 万亿美元,其次是中国(3300 亿美元)和日本(680 亿美元)。此外,在大多数亚洲国家,人均 GDP 增长和生命价值节省将随着人均 GDP 的增加而增加。在几种社会经济和暴露-反应函数假设下,我们稳健地证实了这一定性结论。