• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自适应倾向评分截断在因果推断中的应用。

On adaptive propensity score truncation in causal inference.

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1741-1760. doi: 10.1177/0962280218774817. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1177/0962280218774817
PMID:29991330
Abstract

The positivity assumption, or the experimental treatment assignment (ETA) assumption, is important for identifiability in causal inference. Even if the positivity assumption holds, practical violations of this assumption may jeopardize the finite sample performance of the causal estimator. One of the consequences of practical violations of the positivity assumption is extreme values in the estimated propensity score (PS). A common practice to address this issue is truncating the PS estimate when constructing PS-based estimators. In this study, we propose a novel adaptive truncation method, Positivity-C-TMLE, based on the collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimation (C-TMLE) methodology. We demonstrate the outstanding performance of our novel approach in a variety of simulations by comparing it with other commonly studied estimators. Results show that by adaptively truncating the estimated PS with a more targeted objective function, the Positivity-C-TMLE estimator achieves the best performance for both point estimation and confidence interval coverage among all estimators considered.

摘要

阳性假设,或实验治疗分配(ETA)假设,对于因果推理中的可识别性很重要。即使阳性假设成立,该假设的实际违反也可能危及因果估计量的有限样本性能。阳性假设实际违反的后果之一是估计倾向评分(PS)中的极值。解决此问题的一种常见做法是在构建基于 PS 的估计器时截断 PS 估计。在这项研究中,我们基于协作靶向最大似然估计(C-TMLE)方法提出了一种新的自适应截断方法,即阳性 C-TMLE。我们通过与其他常用的估计器进行比较,在各种模拟中展示了我们的新方法的出色性能。结果表明,通过使用更有针对性的目标函数自适应地截断估计的 PS,阳性 C-TMLE 估计器在所有考虑的估计器中在点估计和置信区间覆盖方面都取得了最佳性能。

相似文献

1
On adaptive propensity score truncation in causal inference.自适应倾向评分截断在因果推断中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1741-1760. doi: 10.1177/0962280218774817. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
2
Data-Adaptive Selection of the Propensity Score Truncation Level for Inverse-Probability-Weighted and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Marginal Point Treatment Effects.数据自适应选择倾向评分截断水平对边际点处理效应的逆概率加权和有偏极大似然估计。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Aug 22;191(9):1640-1651. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac087.
3
Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.纵向治疗效果的双重稳健有效估计量:模拟中的比较性能及一个案例研究
Int J Biostat. 2019 Feb 26;15(2):/j/ijb.2019.15.issue-2/ijb-2017-0054/ijb-2017-0054.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0054.
4
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation in safety analysis.目标最大似然估计在安全性分析中的应用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8 Suppl):S91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.017.
5
Causal inference in case of near-violation of positivity: comparison of methods.在接近违反正性假设情况下的因果推断:方法比较
Biom J. 2022 Dec;64(8):1389-1403. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000323. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.二元结局和高维协变量数据的点暴露研究中的效应估计——靶向最大似然估计与治疗权重逆概率的比较
Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2). doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0034.
7
Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.协作双稳健靶向最大似然估计
Int J Biostat. 2010 May 17;6(1):Article 17. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1181.
8
Understanding and diagnosing the potential for bias when using machine learning methods with doubly robust causal estimators.理解和诊断在使用具有双重稳健因果估计器的机器学习方法时潜在的偏差。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1637-1650. doi: 10.1177/0962280218772065. Epub 2018 May 2.
9
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.观察性研究中因果推断的靶向最大似然估计
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jan 1;185(1):65-73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww165. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
10
Causal inference in the absence of positivity: The role of overlap weights.在缺乏阳性结果的情况下进行因果推断:重叠权重的作用。
Biom J. 2024 Jun;66(4):e2300156. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202300156.

引用本文的文献

1
Risky relationships: Secondhand harms and health indicators associated with college students' relationships with heavy drinkers.危险关系:与大学生和酗酒者的关系相关的二手伤害及健康指标
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2025 Jul;49(7):1576-1586. doi: 10.1111/acer.70083. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
2
Assessing racial disparities in healthcare expenditure using generalized propensity score weighting.使用广义倾向得分加权法评估医疗保健支出中的种族差异。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02508-2.
3
Evaluating the robustness of targeted maximum likelihood estimators via realistic simulations in nutrition intervention trials.
通过营养干预试验中的现实模拟评估靶向极大似然估计量的稳健性。
Stat Med. 2022 May 30;41(12):2132-2165. doi: 10.1002/sim.9348. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
Propensity Score Weighting and Trimming Strategies for Reducing Variance and Bias of Treatment Effect Estimates: A Simulation Study.倾向评分加权和修剪策略可减少治疗效果估计的方差和偏差:一项模拟研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 1;190(8):1659-1670. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab041.
5
Estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments in observational studies with a binary outcome.二元结局观察性研究中多种治疗因果效应的估计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3218-3234. doi: 10.1177/0962280220921909. Epub 2020 May 25.
6
Causal inference with multiple concurrent medications: A comparison of methods and an application in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.多药并发情况下的因果推断:方法比较及在耐多药结核病中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3534-3549. doi: 10.1177/0962280218808817. Epub 2018 Oct 31.