• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物不良反应对贝达喹啉治疗耐药性结核病增量成本效果的影响。

Impact of adverse drug reactions on the incremental cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline for drug-resistant tuberculosis.

机构信息

Health Economics Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.

Clinical HIV Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg, South Africa;, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Aug 1;22(8):918-925. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0869.

DOI:10.5588/ijtld.17.0869
PMID:29991402
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common during standard, long-course treatment for multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-/RR-TB). In particular, second-line injectables (SLIs) are associated with permanent hearing loss, acute renal injury and electrolyte imbalance. We adapted an established Markov model for ambulatory treatment to estimate the impact of the toxicity profile on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for a proposed MDR-/RR-TB regimen replacing the SLI with bedaquiline (BDQ).

METHODS

Treatment effectiveness was evaluated in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Clinical outcomes and ingredient costs from a provider perspective were derived from the South African public-sector treatment program or extracted from the literature. Costs and effectiveness were discounted at 3% per year over 10 years.

RESULTS

A BDQ-based MDR-/RR-TB regimen compared with the SLI regimen had a mean ICER of US$516 per DALY averted using the standard Markov model. Costs for both regimens increased and effectiveness decreased for the SLI regimen once adjusted for toxicity. The resulting ICER for the BDQ-based regimen was cost saving (US$96/patient) and more effective (0.96 DALYs averted) after adjusting for ADRs.

CONCLUSION

Decision-analysis models of treatment for MDR-/RR-TB, including new drug regimens, should consider the costs of managing ADRs and their sequelae.

摘要

背景

在多药耐药和利福平耐药结核病(MDR-/RR-TB)的标准长程治疗中,不良反应(ADRs)很常见。特别是,二线注射剂(SLIs)与永久性听力损失、急性肾损伤和电解质失衡有关。我们改编了一个现有的门诊治疗马尔可夫模型,以估计毒性特征对提议的 MDR-/RR-TB 方案的增量成本效益比(ICER)的影响,该方案用贝达喹啉(BDQ)替代 SLI。

方法

从残疾调整生命年(DALYs)的角度评估治疗效果。从南非公共部门治疗计划中得出或从文献中提取临床结果和成分成本。成本和效果在 10 年内每年贴现 3%。

结果

BDQ 为基础的 MDR-/RR-TB 方案与 SLI 方案相比,使用标准马尔可夫模型,每避免一个 DALY 的平均 ICER 为 516 美元。一旦调整了毒性,两种方案的成本都增加了,而 SLI 方案的效果降低了。在调整 ADR 后,BDQ 方案的 ICER 为节省成本(每位患者 96 美元),更有效(避免 0.96 DALY)。

结论

MDR-/RR-TB 治疗的决策分析模型,包括新的药物方案,应考虑管理 ADRs 及其后果的成本。

相似文献

1
Impact of adverse drug reactions on the incremental cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline for drug-resistant tuberculosis.药物不良反应对贝达喹啉治疗耐药性结核病增量成本效果的影响。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Aug 1;22(8):918-925. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0869.
2
Incremental Cost Effectiveness of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Africa: Model-Based Analysis.贝达喹啉治疗南非利福平耐药结核病的增量成本效果:基于模型的分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Feb;16(1):43-54. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0352-8.
3
The cost-effectiveness of a bedaquiline-containing short-course regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa.南非含贝达喹啉短程方案治疗耐多药结核病的成本效果分析。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 May;18(5):475-483. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1742109. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
4
Health outcomes of bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in selected high burden countries.在部分高负担国家中,贝达喹啉治疗耐多药结核病的健康结局。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1931-3.
5
Bedaquiline- versus injectable-containing drug-resistant tuberculosis regimens: a cost-effectiveness analysis.贝达喹啉与含注射剂的耐多药结核病治疗方案:成本效益分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Dec;18(6):677-689. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1507821. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
Direct costs of managing adverse drug reactions during rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment in South Africa.南非耐利福平结核病治疗期间管理药物不良反应的直接成本。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Apr 1;22(4):393-398. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0661.
7
Cost-effectiveness of adding novel or group 5 interventions to a background regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Germany.在德国,将新型或第5组干预措施添加到背景治疗方案中用于治疗耐多药结核病的成本效益。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 8;17(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2118-2.
8
Cost-effectiveness of adding bedaquiline to drug regimens for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the UK.在英国,将贝达喹啉添加到治疗耐多药结核病的药物方案中的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120763. eCollection 2015.
9
Cost comparison of nine-month treatment regimens with 20-month standardized care for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant/multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in Nigeria.尼日利亚利福平耐药/耐多药结核病 9 个月治疗方案与 20 个月标准化护理成本比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0241065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241065. eCollection 2020.
10
Impact and cost-effectiveness of the 6-month BPaLM regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Moldova: A mathematical modeling analysis.摩尔多瓦利福平耐药结核病 6 个月 BPaLM 方案的影响和成本效益:一项数学建模分析。
PLoS Med. 2024 May 3;21(5):e1004401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004401. eCollection 2024 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking Tuberculosis Morbidity Quantification: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of TB Disability Weights in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.重新思考结核病发病率量化:成本效益分析中结核病残疾权重的系统评价和批判性评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Nov;42(11):1209-1236. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01410-x. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
2
A systematic review of economic evaluations of pharmacological treatments for active tuberculosis.一项关于抗结核药物治疗的经济学评价的系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 16;12:1201512. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1201512. eCollection 2024.
3
Bedaquiline-based treatment for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
贝达喹啉为基础的方案治疗南非广泛耐药结核病:成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0272770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272770. eCollection 2022.
4
Cost-Utility Analysis of Molecular Testing for Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Thailand.泰国疑似肺结核患者中用于结核病诊断的分子检测的成本效用分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Feb 2;14:61-73. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S350606. eCollection 2022.
5
A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Active Tuberculosis Treatments.活动性结核病治疗的经济评估系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Dec 13;12:736986. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.736986. eCollection 2021.
6
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid for treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa, Georgia and the Philippines.贝达喹啉、普托马尼德和利奈唑胺治疗南非、格鲁吉亚和菲律宾广泛耐药结核病的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e051521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051521.
7
Evidence gaps in economic analyses of hearing healthcare: A systematic review.听力保健经济分析中的证据缺口:一项系统综述。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May 8;35:100872. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100872. eCollection 2021 May.