• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝达喹啉为基础的方案治疗南非广泛耐药结核病:成本效果分析。

Bedaquiline-based treatment for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, School of Pharmacy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0272770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272770. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0272770
PMID:35930574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9355220/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment success rate of conventional anti-tuberculosis (TB) regimens for extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) is low, resulting in high morbidity and healthcare cost especially in the high TB burden countries. Recent clinical findings reported improved treatment outcomes of XDR-TB with the bedaquiline (BDQ)-based regimens. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of BDQ-based treatment for XDR-TB from the perspective of the South Africa national healthcare provider.

METHODS

A 2-year decision-analytic model was designed to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of a hypothetical cohort of adult XDR-TB patients with (1) BDQ-based regimen and (2) injectable-based conventional regimen. The model inputs were retrieved from literature and public data. Base-case analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed. The primary model outputs included TB-related direct medical cost and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, the BDQ group reduced 4.4152 DALYs with an incremental cost of USD1,606 when compared to the conventional group. The incremental cost per DALY averted (ICER) by the BDQ group was 364 USD/DALY averted. No influential factor was identified in the sensitivity analysis. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the BDQ group was accepted as cost-effective in 97.82% of the 10,000 simulations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 5,656 USD/DALY averted (1× gross domestic product per capita in South Africa).

CONCLUSION

The BDQ-based therapy appeared to be cost-effective and showed a high probability to be accepted as the preferred cost-effective option for active XDR-TB treatment.

摘要

背景

传统抗结核(TB)方案治疗广泛耐药结核病(XDR-TB)的成功率较低,导致发病率和医疗保健费用较高,尤其是在结核病负担较高的国家。最近的临床发现报告称,贝达喹啉(BDQ)为基础的方案可改善 XDR-TB 的治疗结果。我们旨在从南非国家医疗保健提供者的角度评估 BDQ 为基础的治疗方案治疗 XDR-TB 的成本效益。

方法

设计了一个为期 2 年的决策分析模型,以评估假设的一组成人 XDR-TB 患者的临床和经济结果:(1)BDQ 为基础的方案;(2)注射用传统方案。模型输入来自文献和公共数据。进行了基础案例分析和敏感性分析。主要模型输出包括与结核病相关的直接医疗费用和残疾调整生命年(DALYs)。

结果

在基础案例分析中,与传统组相比,BDQ 组减少了 4.4152 个 DALYs,增量成本为 1606 美元。BDQ 组每避免一个 DALY 的增量成本(ICER)为 364 美元。在敏感性分析中没有发现有影响力的因素。在概率敏感性分析中,在 5656 美元/避免一个 DALY 的意愿支付阈值(南非人均国内生产总值的 1 倍)下,BDQ 组在 10000 次模拟中的 97.82%被认为是具有成本效益的。

结论

BDQ 为基础的治疗似乎具有成本效益,并且很有可能被接受为治疗活动性 XDR-TB 的首选具有成本效益的方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d5/9355220/d4f923dc401b/pone.0272770.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d5/9355220/5b696b3d5449/pone.0272770.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d5/9355220/160ed195f604/pone.0272770.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d5/9355220/730008ee9a95/pone.0272770.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d5/9355220/d4f923dc401b/pone.0272770.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d5/9355220/5b696b3d5449/pone.0272770.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d5/9355220/160ed195f604/pone.0272770.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d5/9355220/730008ee9a95/pone.0272770.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d5/9355220/d4f923dc401b/pone.0272770.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Bedaquiline-based treatment for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa: A cost-effectiveness analysis.贝达喹啉为基础的方案治疗南非广泛耐药结核病:成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0272770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272770. eCollection 2022.
2
The cost-effectiveness of a bedaquiline-containing short-course regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa.南非含贝达喹啉短程方案治疗耐多药结核病的成本效果分析。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 May;18(5):475-483. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1742109. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
3
Incremental Cost Effectiveness of Bedaquiline for the Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis in South Africa: Model-Based Analysis.贝达喹啉治疗南非利福平耐药结核病的增量成本效果:基于模型的分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Feb;16(1):43-54. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0352-8.
4
Effectiveness and safety of bedaquiline-containing regimens for treatment on patients with refractory RR/MDR/XDR-tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study in East China.含贝达喹啉方案治疗耐多药/广泛耐药/甚至全耐药结核病患者的有效性和安全性:华东地区的一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 29;22(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07693-9.
5
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid for treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa, Georgia and the Philippines.贝达喹啉、普托马尼德和利奈唑胺治疗南非、格鲁吉亚和菲律宾广泛耐药结核病的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e051521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051521.
6
Impact of adverse drug reactions on the incremental cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline for drug-resistant tuberculosis.药物不良反应对贝达喹啉治疗耐药性结核病增量成本效果的影响。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Aug 1;22(8):918-925. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0869.
7
Bedaquiline- versus injectable-containing drug-resistant tuberculosis regimens: a cost-effectiveness analysis.贝达喹啉与含注射剂的耐多药结核病治疗方案:成本效益分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Dec;18(6):677-689. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1507821. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
8
Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis with bedaquiline in a high HIV prevalence setting: an interim cohort analysis.在艾滋病毒高流行环境中使用贝达喹啉治疗耐多药结核病:一项中期队列分析。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 Aug;19(8):979-85. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0944.
9
Health outcomes of bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in selected high burden countries.在部分高负担国家中,贝达喹啉治疗耐多药结核病的健康结局。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1931-3.
10
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline or delamanid plus background regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-income intermediate burden city of China.中国高收入中等负担城市中贝达喹啉或德拉马尼加背景方案治疗耐多药结核病的成本效益。
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;78:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) for detection of tuberculosis drug resistance in India, South Africa and Georgia: a modeling analysis.靶向新一代测序(tNGS)用于印度、南非和格鲁吉亚检测结核耐药性的成本效益:一项建模分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Dec 24;79:103003. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103003. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Rethinking Tuberculosis Morbidity Quantification: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of TB Disability Weights in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.重新思考结核病发病率量化:成本效益分析中结核病残疾权重的系统评价和批判性评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Nov;42(11):1209-1236. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01410-x. Epub 2024 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of pharmacoeconomic evaluations on oral diarylquinoline-based treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis: from high to low burden countries.基于口服二芳基喹啉的耐多药结核病治疗的药物经济学评价系统综述:从高负担国家到低负担国家
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Oct;21(5):897-910. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1925111. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
2
Bedaquiline-containing regimens in patients with pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in China: focus on the safety.含贝达喹啉方案治疗中国耐多药肺结核患者:重点关注安全性。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Mar 19;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00819-2.
3
Duration of palliative care before death in international routine practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
国际常规实践中死亡前姑息治疗的持续时间:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 26;18(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01829-x.
4
The cost-effectiveness of a bedaquiline-containing short-course regimen for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa.南非含贝达喹啉短程方案治疗耐多药结核病的成本效果分析。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020 May;18(5):475-483. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1742109. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
5
Treatment of Highly Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis.耐多药肺结核的治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):893-902. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901814.
6
Bedaquiline in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment: Safety and efficacy in a Korean subpopulation.贝达喹啉用于耐多药结核病治疗:韩国亚人群中的安全性和疗效
Respir Investig. 2020 Jan;58(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
7
Early access to bedaquiline for extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pre-XDR tuberculosis.早期获取贝达喹啉用于广泛耐药和准广泛耐药结核病。
Eur Respir J. 2019 Jul 25;54(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02208-2018. Print 2019 Jul.
8
Treatment outcomes of pre- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Johannesburg, South Africa.南非约翰内斯堡耐多药和广泛耐药结核病的治疗结果。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Dec 1;22(12):1469-1474. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0205.
9
Cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline or delamanid plus background regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-income intermediate burden city of China.中国高收入中等负担城市中贝达喹啉或德拉马尼加背景方案治疗耐多药结核病的成本效益。
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;78:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
10
Impact of adverse drug reactions on the incremental cost-effectiveness of bedaquiline for drug-resistant tuberculosis.药物不良反应对贝达喹啉治疗耐药性结核病增量成本效果的影响。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Aug 1;22(8):918-925. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0869.