• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Role of personality traits in reporting the development of adverse drug reactions: a prospective cohort study of the Estonian general population.人格特质在报告药物不良反应发生情况中的作用:爱沙尼亚普通人群的一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 10;8(7):e022428. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022428.
2
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.评估患者向英国“黄卡计划”报告药物不良反应的情况:文献回顾、描述性和定性分析以及问卷调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200.
3
Personality traits and course of symptoms of depression and apathy after stroke: Results of the CASPER study.人格特质与中风后抑郁和淡漠症状的病程:CASPER 研究结果。
J Psychosom Res. 2018 Aug;111:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 21.
4
Cohort Profile: Estonian Biobank of the Estonian Genome Center, University of Tartu.队列简介:塔尔图大学爱沙尼亚基因组中心的爱沙尼亚生物样本库
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1137-47. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt268. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
5
Frequency, types, severity, preventability and costs of Adverse Drug Reactions at a tertiary care hospital.一家三级护理医院的药品不良反应的发生率、类型、严重程度、可预防性及成本
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2016 Sep-Oct;81:323-34. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
6
Adverse drug reactions in the paediatric population in Denmark: a retrospective analysis of reports made to the Danish Medicines Agency from 1998 to 2007.丹麦儿科人群中的药物不良反应:对 1998 年至 2007 年向丹麦药品管理局报告的病例的回顾性分析。
Drug Saf. 2010 Apr 1;33(4):327-39. doi: 10.2165/11319100-000000000-00000.
7
Do Personality Traits Mediate the Relationship Between Childhood Abuse and Migraine? An Exploration of the Relationships in Young Adults Using the Add Health Dataset.人格特质是否在儿童期虐待与偏头痛之间起中介作用?利用“健康增进纵向研究”数据对青年期两者关系的探讨。
Headache. 2018 Feb;58(2):243-259. doi: 10.1111/head.13206. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
8
Prevalence and predictors of patients reporting adverse drug reactions to health care providers during oral targeted cancer treatment.在口服靶向癌症治疗期间,向医护人员报告药物不良反应的患者的流行率和预测因素。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Jan-Feb;61(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
The influence of personality traits on perception of pain in older adults - Findings from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care - Blekinge study.人格特质对老年人疼痛感知的影响——瑞典国家老龄化与护理研究——布莱金厄研究的结果
Scand J Pain. 2015 Apr 1;7(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.12.002.
10
Personality traits measured by the Swedish universities Scales of Personality: factor structure and position within the five-factor model in an Estonian sample.由瑞典大学人格量表测量的人格特质:爱沙尼亚样本中的因素结构及在五因素模型中的位置。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2009;63(3):231-6. doi: 10.1080/08039480802571036.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality vulnerabilities and adverse event reporting in phase 1 clinical studies.在 1 期临床试验中人格脆弱性与不良事件报告。
Trials. 2024 Jul 18;25(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08321-4.
2
Association of post-vaccination adverse reactions after influenza vaccine with mortality and cardiopulmonary outcomes in patients with high-risk cardiovascular disease: the INVESTED trial.接种流感疫苗后不良反应与高危心血管疾病患者的死亡率和心肺结局的关系:INVESTED 试验。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;25(2):299-310. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2716. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
3
Associations between the Willingness to Donate Samples to Biobanks and Selected Psychological Variables.将样本捐赠给生物库的意愿与选定心理变量之间的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):2552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052552.

本文引用的文献

1
The nocebo effect of drugs.药物的反安慰剂效应。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2016 Mar 17;4(2):e00208. doi: 10.1002/prp2.208. eCollection 2016 Apr.
2
Epidemiology of adverse drug reactions in Europe: a review of recent observational studies.欧洲药物不良反应的流行病学:近期观察性研究综述
Drug Saf. 2015 May;38(5):437-53. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0281-0.
3
Within-trait heterogeneity in age group differences in personality domains and facets: implications for the development and coherence of personality traits.人格领域和层面年龄组差异中的特质内异质性:对人格特质发展与连贯性的启示
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 9;10(3):e0119667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119667. eCollection 2015.
4
ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.公众药品不良反应报告:荷兰和瑞典系统的经验教训
Drug Saf. 2015 Apr;38(4):337-47. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0264-1.
5
Mutual reinforcement between neuroticism and life experiences: a five-wave, 16-year study to test reciprocal causation.神经质与生活经历的相互增强:一项检验相互因果关系的五波、16 年研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Oct;107(4):751-64. doi: 10.1037/a0037009. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
6
Factors affecting the development of adverse drug reactions (Review article).影响药物不良反应发展的因素(综述文章)。
Saudi Pharm J. 2014 Apr;22(2):83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
7
Cohort Profile: Estonian Biobank of the Estonian Genome Center, University of Tartu.队列简介:塔尔图大学爱沙尼亚基因组中心的爱沙尼亚生物样本库
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1137-47. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt268. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
8
Personality, well-being, and health.人格、幸福感与健康。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:719-42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123.
9
ICD-10 codes used to identify adverse drug events in administrative data: a systematic review.用于在行政数据中识别药物不良事件的 ICD-10 代码:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):547-57. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002116. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
Prevalence and perceived preventability of self-reported adverse drug events--a population-based survey of 7099 adults.报告的药物不良事件的流行率和可感知的可预防率——一项针对 7099 名成年人的基于人群的调查。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 4;8(9):e73166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073166. eCollection 2013.

人格特质在报告药物不良反应发生情况中的作用:爱沙尼亚普通人群的一项前瞻性队列研究。

Role of personality traits in reporting the development of adverse drug reactions: a prospective cohort study of the Estonian general population.

作者信息

Realo Anu, van Middendorp Henriët, Kööts-Ausmees Liisi, Allik Jüri, Evers Andrea W M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 10;8(7):e022428. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022428.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022428
PMID:29991635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6089302/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the role of the Five Factor Model (FFM) personality traits in reporting the development of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) when controlling for sociodemographic variables and health status.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

The Estonian Biobank of the Estonian Genome Centre, University of Tartu.

PARTICIPANTS

814 women and 543 men (mean age=47.9 years; =15.2) who after the initial enrolment in the Estonian Biobank were re-contacted for follow-up purposes about 5.3 years after the enrolment and for whom both self- and informant-reported personality data were available.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Participants who did not report having any ADRs at baseline but who reported ADRs at the follow-up about 5.3 years later versus participants who did not report any ADRs at either time point. The reports of developing ADRs were predicted from the FFM personality traits after statistically controlling for sociodemographic variables (age, gender and education), baseline indicators of health status (number of diagnoses and medicines taken, body mass index and blood pressure), and the change in health status between the two measurements.

RESULTS

The results of a hierarchical binary logistic regression analysis showed that participants who reported the development of ADRs between the two measurements had higher levels of conscientiousness, were more likely to be women, were taking more medicines at baseline and had a higher increase in the number of medicines taken during the study period than participants who did not report any ADRs at either time point (all p values <0.05). Higher neuroticism (p=0.067) and a higher number of diagnosed diseases at baseline (p=0.053) also made marginal contributions to predicting the development of ADRs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows for the first time that higher levels of conscientiousness and neuroticism are associated with reporting the development of ADRs.

摘要

目的

在控制社会人口统计学变量和健康状况的情况下,研究五因素模型(FFM)人格特质在报告药物不良反应(ADR)发生情况中的作用。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

塔尔图大学爱沙尼亚基因组中心的爱沙尼亚生物银行。

参与者

814名女性和543名男性(平均年龄=47.9岁;标准差=15.2),他们在最初加入爱沙尼亚生物银行后,在入组约5.3年后被再次联系进行随访,且同时有自我报告和他人报告的人格数据。

主要观察指标

在基线时未报告有任何ADR,但在约5.3年后的随访中报告有ADR的参与者,与在两个时间点均未报告任何ADR的参与者进行对比。在对社会人口统计学变量(年龄、性别和教育程度)、健康状况的基线指标(诊断次数和服用药物数量、体重指数和血压)以及两次测量之间的健康状况变化进行统计学控制后,从FFM人格特质预测ADR的发生情况。

结果

分层二元逻辑回归分析结果显示,在两次测量之间报告有ADR发生的参与者,与在两个时间点均未报告任何ADR的参与者相比,尽责性水平更高,更可能为女性,基线时服用的药物更多,且在研究期间服用药物数量的增加幅度更大(所有p值<0.05)。较高的神经质水平(p=0.067)和基线时较高的确诊疾病数量(p=0.053)对预测ADR的发生也有边际贡献。

结论

本研究首次表明,较高的尽责性和神经质水平与报告ADR的发生有关。