• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量全球危机 8 年后欧洲的不稳定就业情况。

Measuring precarious employment in Europe 8 years into the global crisis.

机构信息

Group of Evaluation of Health Determinants and Health Policies, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Jun 1;41(2):259-267. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy114.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdy114
PMID:29992268
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to describe the prevalence of precarious employment in the European Union (EU) using a multidimensional approach, 8 years into the economic crisis (2014).

METHODS

We use data from the Flash Eurobarometer 398 among salaried workers (n = 7702). We calculated the proportion and its 95% confidence intervals (CI 95%) for each of the precarious employment dimensions (not having the ability to exercise rights, vulnerability, disempowerment and temporariness), the prevalence of precarious employment (presenting at least one dimension) and the proportion of workers presenting one, two, three or four dimensions.

RESULTS

Two out of three workers had a precarious employment. The prevalence of precariousness was higher in Eastern (72.64%; CI 95%: 61.78; 81.34) than in Nordic European countries (51.17%; CI 95%: 44.30; 58.00). The most prevalent dimension was not having the ability to exercise rights (42.39%).

CONCLUSIONS

Precarious employment is an important social determinant of health. Therefore, the EU policy-makers should take into consideration the new forms of employment and legislate accordingly.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在采用多维方法描述经济危机 8 年后(2014 年)欧盟(EU)不稳定就业的普遍情况。

方法

我们使用 Flash Eurobarometer 398 中受薪工人的数据(n=7702)。我们计算了每个不稳定就业维度(无法行使权利、脆弱性、无权和临时性)的比例及其 95%置信区间(95%CI)、不稳定就业的流行率(至少存在一个维度)以及存在一个、两个、三个或四个维度的工人比例。

结果

三分之二的工人就业不稳定。与北欧国家(51.17%;95%CI:44.30;58.00)相比,东欧国家(72.64%;95%CI:61.78;81.34)的不稳定率更高。最常见的维度是无法行使权利(42.39%)。

结论

不稳定就业是健康的一个重要社会决定因素。因此,欧盟政策制定者应考虑新的就业形式并相应立法。

相似文献

1
Measuring precarious employment in Europe 8 years into the global crisis.测量全球危机 8 年后欧洲的不稳定就业情况。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Jun 1;41(2):259-267. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy114.
2
Measuring employment precariousness in the European Working Conditions Survey: the social distribution in Europe.在欧洲工作条件调查中衡量就业不稳定状况:欧洲的社会分布
Work. 2014;49(1):143-61. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131645.
3
[Multidimensional measurement of precarious employment: social distribution and its association with health in Catalonia (Spain)].[不稳定就业的多维测量:西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区的社会分布及其与健康的关联]
Gac Sanit. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):375-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 May 14.
4
Measuring precarious employment in times of crisis: the revised Employment Precariousness Scale (EPRES) in Spain.危机时期不稳定就业的衡量:西班牙修订后的就业不稳定量表(EPRES)
Gac Sanit. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):379-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
5
Sickness Absence and Precarious Employment: A Comparative Cross-National Study of Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and Norway.病假缺勤与不稳定就业:丹麦、芬兰、瑞典和挪威的跨国比较研究。
Int J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jul;7(3):125-47. doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2016.713.
6
Association between Precarious Employment and Chronic Stress: Effect of Gender, Stress Measurement and Precariousness Dimensions-A Cross-Sectional Study.不稳定就业与慢性压力的关联:性别、压力测量和不稳定性维度的影响——一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9099. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159099.
7
The importance of using a multi-dimensional scale to capture the various impacts of precarious employment on health: Results from a national survey of Chilean workers.使用多维尺度来捕捉不稳定性就业对健康的各种影响的重要性:来自智利全国工人调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0238401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238401. eCollection 2020.
8
Precarious employment is a risk factor for poor mental health in young individuals in Sweden: a cohort study with multiple follow-ups.不稳定就业是瑞典年轻人心理健康不佳的一个风险因素:一项多次随访的队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 2;16:687. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3358-5.
9
How does employment quality relate to health and job satisfaction in Europe? A typological approach.在欧洲,就业质量与健康及工作满意度之间有怎样的关系?一种类型学方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jun;158:132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
10
Employment precariousness in Spain: prevalence, social distribution, and population-attributable risk percent of poor mental health.西班牙就业不稳定状况:流行程度、社会分布情况以及不良心理健康的人群归因风险百分比。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(4):625-46. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.4.b.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Evaluated Labor Market Initiatives Addressing Precarious Employment: Findings and Public Health Implications.关于应对不稳定就业的劳动力市场举措评估的系统综述:研究结果及对公共卫生的影响
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2025 Jul;55(3):268-288. doi: 10.1177/27551938241310120. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
The influence of economic policies on social environments and mental health.经济政策对社会环境和心理健康的影响。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 May 1;102(5):323-329. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.290286. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
3
Inequality in workplace support for various types of precarious workers compared with permanent workers in Japan: A cross-sectional study.
日本各类临时工与正式工在工作场所获得支持方面的不平等:一项横断面研究。
J Occup Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;65(1):e12431. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12431.
4
Inequalities in the impact of having a chronic disease on entering permanent paid employment: a registry-based 10-year follow-up study.患有慢性病对进入永久性带薪就业的影响存在不平等:基于登记的 10 年随访研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Jul;77(7):474-480. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219891. Epub 2023 May 23.
5
Measuring, Modeling, and Forecasting the Mental Wealth of Nations.衡量、建模和预测国家的精神财富。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:879183. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.879183. eCollection 2022.
6
Initiatives Addressing Precarious Employment and Its Effects on Workers' Health and Well-Being: A Systematic Review.解决不稳定就业及其对工人健康和福祉影响的举措:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 16;19(4):2232. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042232.
7
Initiatives addressing precarious employment and its effects on workers' health and well-being: a protocol for a systematic review.针对不稳定就业及其对工人健康和福祉影响的举措:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 30;10(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01728-z.