Department of Otolaryngology, Sawan Pracharak Hospital, Nakhon Sawan, Thailand.
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama 4 Road, Prathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018 Jul 11;18(9):46. doi: 10.1007/s11882-018-0800-z.
Preliminary studies have suggested differences in endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) across ancestry/ethnic groups. Eosinophilic CRS (ECRS) is the predominant subtype for Western/European ancestry CRS patients and non-eosinophilic CRS (nECRS) for Asian patients. This review aims to re-analyze CRS endotypes across ancestry populations using one consistent criteria to existing data.
Although tissue eosinophilia is the most commonly used criterion for ECRS, various cut-off points are suggested. Surrogate markers have been extensively studied. Sixty-six cohorts with study criteria were included with a total of 8557 patients. Raw data from 11 studies 544 patients were re-analyzed using number of tissue eosinophils. At lower cut-off values of ≥ 5 and ≥ 10 cells/HPF, most patients of Asian and Western/European ancestry were classified as ECRS without difference. In contrast, at cut-off points of ≥ 70 and ≥ 120 cells/HPF, the majority of both groups became reclassified as nECRS. After applying one consistent criteria to existing data, differences across ancestry and geographic populations in endotypes of CRS were no longer evident.
综述目的:初步研究表明,慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)的表型在不同的种族/族群中存在差异。嗜酸性粒细胞性 CRS(ECRS)是西方/欧洲裔 CRS 患者的主要亚型,而非嗜酸性粒细胞性 CRS(nECRS)则是亚洲患者的主要亚型。本综述旨在使用一个统一的标准对现有数据进行重新分析,以确定 CRS 的表型在不同种族群体中的差异。
最新发现:尽管组织嗜酸性粒细胞增多是 ECRS 的最常用标准,但也提出了各种截断值。替代标志物已被广泛研究。共纳入了 66 个符合研究标准的队列,共 8557 例患者。使用组织嗜酸性粒细胞数量对 11 项研究 544 例患者的原始数据进行了重新分析。在较低的截值≥5 和≥10 个细胞/高倍视野(HPF)下,亚洲和西方/欧洲裔的大多数患者被归类为 ECRS,没有差异。相比之下,在截值≥70 和≥120 个细胞/HPF 时,两组患者大多数都被重新归类为 nECRS。在对现有数据应用一个统一的标准后,CRS 表型在不同种族和地理人群中的差异不再明显。