Yaeger Daniel, Murphy Kristi, Winger Jena, Stavrianeas Stasinos
Department of Exercise Science, Willamette University, Salem, OR, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2018 Jun 1;11(4):681-695. doi: 10.70252/ALJO7892. eCollection 2018.
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a two-test method for precisely identifying the Maximal Lactate Steady State (MLSS). Eight male competitive cyclists performed two bouts on a cycle ergometer. Following a maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O) test (66.91 ± 5.29 mL·kg·min) we identified the lactate deflection point using the visual deflection (T), Log-Log (T), D (T), RER = 1.00 (T), ventilatory threshold (T), and the 1.0 mmol·L increase above baseline (T) methods. The second incremental test (SIT) consisted of 6-7 stages (5 min each) starting 20-30 W below to 20-30 W above the predetermined deflection point, in 10 W increments. Comparison of the two tests yielded different threshold estimates (range 11-46W) for all methods ( = 0.001-0.019) except the T ( = 0.194) and T ( = 0.100). The SIT resulted in significantly ( = 0.007) more narrow range of thresholds (27.5 ± 11.01W) compared to the V̇O test (70 ± 42.51W). The T from the SIT was identified as the MLSS and was verified using three 45-minute steady-state exercise bouts at 95%, 100%, and 105% of MLSS intensity (average increment 12.8 W). Blood lactate and V̇O were recorded every 5 minutes and differed between the three intensities at every time point ( < 0.001). V̇O increased from the 5 to the 45 minute by 7.02 mL·kg·min (100% MLSS), 3.63 mL·kg·min (95% MLSS) and 7.5 mL·kg·min (105% MLSS, to the 30 minute). These results indicate that the MLSS was identified correctly by the SIT, the single incremental test overestimated the MLSS intensity, and the T provides a very accurate determination of the lactate breakpoint. The use of a second submaximal test is required for a precise identification of MLSS.
本研究的目的是确定一种双测试方法精确识别最大乳酸稳态(MLSS)的有效性。八名男性职业自行车运动员在自行车测力计上进行了两轮测试。在进行最大摄氧量(V̇O)测试(66.91±5.29 mL·kg·min)后,我们使用视觉拐点(T)、对数-对数(T)、D(T)、呼吸交换率=1.00(T)、通气阈值(T)以及高于基线1.0 mmol·L的增量(T)方法来确定乳酸拐点。第二次递增测试(SIT)由6-7个阶段组成(每个阶段5分钟),从预定拐点以下20-30 W开始,以10 W的增量递增至预定拐点以上20-30 W。除了T(P = 0.194)和T(P = 0.100)外,两种测试的比较对所有方法都产生了不同的阈值估计(范围为11-46 W)(P = 0.001-0.019)。与V̇O测试(70±42.51 W)相比,SIT产生的阈值范围明显更窄(27.5±11.01 W)(P = 0.007)。将SIT中的T确定为MLSS,并通过在MLSS强度的95%、100%和105%下进行三轮45分钟的稳态运动测试进行验证(平均增量为12.8 W)。每5分钟记录一次血乳酸和V̇O,在每个时间点三种强度之间均存在差异(P < 0.001)。V̇O在5到45分钟内分别增加了7.02 mL·kg·min(100% MLSS)、3.63 mL·kg·min(95% MLSS)和7.5 mL·kg·min(105% MLSS,至30分钟)。这些结果表明,SIT能够正确识别MLSS,单次递增测试高估了MLSS强度,并且T能够非常准确地确定乳酸拐点。需要使用第二次亚极量测试来精确识别MLSS。