Suppr超能文献

一种用于精确测定最大乳酸稳态的双测试方案。

A Two-test Protocol for the Precise Determination of the Maximal Lactate Steady State.

作者信息

Yaeger Daniel, Murphy Kristi, Winger Jena, Stavrianeas Stasinos

机构信息

Department of Exercise Science, Willamette University, Salem, OR, USA.

出版信息

Int J Exerc Sci. 2018 Jun 1;11(4):681-695. doi: 10.70252/ALJO7892. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of a two-test method for precisely identifying the Maximal Lactate Steady State (MLSS). Eight male competitive cyclists performed two bouts on a cycle ergometer. Following a maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O) test (66.91 ± 5.29 mL·kg·min) we identified the lactate deflection point using the visual deflection (T), Log-Log (T), D (T), RER = 1.00 (T), ventilatory threshold (T), and the 1.0 mmol·L increase above baseline (T) methods. The second incremental test (SIT) consisted of 6-7 stages (5 min each) starting 20-30 W below to 20-30 W above the predetermined deflection point, in 10 W increments. Comparison of the two tests yielded different threshold estimates (range 11-46W) for all methods ( = 0.001-0.019) except the T ( = 0.194) and T ( = 0.100). The SIT resulted in significantly ( = 0.007) more narrow range of thresholds (27.5 ± 11.01W) compared to the V̇O test (70 ± 42.51W). The T from the SIT was identified as the MLSS and was verified using three 45-minute steady-state exercise bouts at 95%, 100%, and 105% of MLSS intensity (average increment 12.8 W). Blood lactate and V̇O were recorded every 5 minutes and differed between the three intensities at every time point ( < 0.001). V̇O increased from the 5 to the 45 minute by 7.02 mL·kg·min (100% MLSS), 3.63 mL·kg·min (95% MLSS) and 7.5 mL·kg·min (105% MLSS, to the 30 minute). These results indicate that the MLSS was identified correctly by the SIT, the single incremental test overestimated the MLSS intensity, and the T provides a very accurate determination of the lactate breakpoint. The use of a second submaximal test is required for a precise identification of MLSS.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定一种双测试方法精确识别最大乳酸稳态(MLSS)的有效性。八名男性职业自行车运动员在自行车测力计上进行了两轮测试。在进行最大摄氧量(V̇O)测试(66.91±5.29 mL·kg·min)后,我们使用视觉拐点(T)、对数-对数(T)、D(T)、呼吸交换率=1.00(T)、通气阈值(T)以及高于基线1.0 mmol·L的增量(T)方法来确定乳酸拐点。第二次递增测试(SIT)由6-7个阶段组成(每个阶段5分钟),从预定拐点以下20-30 W开始,以10 W的增量递增至预定拐点以上20-30 W。除了T(P = 0.194)和T(P = 0.100)外,两种测试的比较对所有方法都产生了不同的阈值估计(范围为11-46 W)(P = 0.001-0.019)。与V̇O测试(70±42.51 W)相比,SIT产生的阈值范围明显更窄(27.5±11.01 W)(P = 0.007)。将SIT中的T确定为MLSS,并通过在MLSS强度的95%、100%和105%下进行三轮45分钟的稳态运动测试进行验证(平均增量为12.8 W)。每5分钟记录一次血乳酸和V̇O,在每个时间点三种强度之间均存在差异(P < 0.001)。V̇O在5到45分钟内分别增加了7.02 mL·kg·min(100% MLSS)、3.63 mL·kg·min(95% MLSS)和7.5 mL·kg·min(105% MLSS,至30分钟)。这些结果表明,SIT能够正确识别MLSS,单次递增测试高估了MLSS强度,并且T能够非常准确地确定乳酸拐点。需要使用第二次亚极量测试来精确识别MLSS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7184/6033502/baabac7fe236/ijes-11-4-681f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验