Monteiro Estêvão R, Novaes Jefferson S, Fiuza Aline G, Portugal Eduardo, Triani Felipe S, Bigio Leonardo, Santos Rudson, Palma Alexandre, Corrêa Neto Victor G
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL.
Gama e Souza College. Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2018 Jun 1;11(6):834-843. doi: 10.70252/ZTJZ6259. eCollection 2018.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the acute heart rate variability behavior after 10 repetitions maximum load test for back squat, leg press, leg extension, and leg flexion in normotensive subjects. Eight recreationally trained women (age: 21.8 ± 2.2 yrs; height: 167.6 ± 6.3 cm; weight: 61.6 ± 10.1 kg) performed two 10 repetitions maximum testing days with 48-hours rest between each one. Heart rate variability was measured in baseline and postexercise (15-, 30-, 45-, and 60-minutes) for time and frequency domain. A significant difference was identified in RMSSD ( = 0.010; effect size = -1.3), MRR ( = 0.026; effect size = -1.3), MHR ( = 0.006; effect size = 1.4), and PNN50% ( = 0.006; effect size = -1.6) when compared 15 minutes postexercise with baseline. For all others comparison and index were no differences ( > 0.05). The present study demonstrates that load test, although works with maximum intensities, did not generate an exacerbated postexercise sympathetic activity. Thus, it seems to be safe for cardiovascular healthy individuals. As a practical application, these results can encourage exercise practitioners to do a maximum load test to resistance training loads prescription.
本研究旨在分析血压正常者在进行深蹲、腿举、腿伸展和腿屈曲的10次最大负荷测试后的急性心率变异性行为。八名接受过休闲训练的女性(年龄:21.8±2.2岁;身高:167.6±6.3厘米;体重:61.6±10.1千克)进行了两天的10次最大负荷测试,每次测试间隔48小时。在基线和运动后(15、30、45和60分钟)测量心率变异性的时域和频域。与基线相比,运动后15分钟时,RMSSD(P = 0.010;效应量 = -1.3)、MRR(P = 0.026;效应量 = -1.3)、MHR(P = 0.006;效应量 = 1.4)和PNN50%(P = 0.006;效应量 = -1.6)存在显著差异。对于所有其他比较,指标均无差异(P>0.05)。本研究表明,负荷测试虽然以最大强度进行,但并未产生运动后交感神经活动加剧的情况。因此,对于心血管健康的个体来说似乎是安全的。作为实际应用,这些结果可以鼓励运动从业者对阻力训练负荷处方进行最大负荷测试。