• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期剖宫产术中延迟脐带结扎:一项初步安全性试验的结果

Delayed cord clamping during elective cesarean deliveries: results of a pilot safety trial.

作者信息

Chantry Caroline J, Blanton Aubrey, Taché Véronique, Finta Laurel, Tancredi Daniel

机构信息

1Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis Medical Center, 2516 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA.

2Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA USA.

出版信息

Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2018 Jul 4;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40748-018-0083-3. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s40748-018-0083-3
PMID:29997897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6031144/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delayed cord clamping (DCC) results in decreased iron deficiency in infancy. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology has called for research on the optimal time to clamp the cord during cesarean deliveries (CD). Our objective was to conduct a pilot trial examining the safety of delayed cord clamping (DCC) for maternal-infant dyads during elective cesarean delivery (CD).

METHODS

We enrolled 39 dyads [23 at 90 s, 16 at 120 s; (DCC Pilot)] between 10/2013 and 9/2014. We abstracted data from the electronic medical record (EMR) for historical controls (HC) birthing between 1/2012-6/2013 for whom DCC was not performed ( = 112).

RESULTS

Available data for 37 mothers and 30 infants compared to HC revealed 174 (95% CI: 61-286) mL lower mean estimated maternal blood loss [(EBL) mean (SD) mL]: DCC Pilot 691(218) vs. HC 864(442),  = 0.003 and lower incidence of maternal transfusions, DCC Pilot 2.7% vs. HC 18.8%,  = 0.016. There was no significant between group difference between DCC Pilot and HC in other a priori definitions of excess maternal blood loss: a) EBL > 800 ml, 21.6% vs. 38.8%,  = 0.07 or b) post-op hgb/pre-op hgb < 80%, 16.7% vs. 20.6%,  = 0.81. There were also no statistically significant between group differences in rates of NICU admission DCC Pilot 8.1% vs. HC 7.1%,  = 1.0., but there was a higher rate of newborn cold stress or hypothermia ≤36.2 °C in study subjects, DCC Pilot 27.0% vs. HC 11.9%,  = 0.038.Prevalence of newborn anemia was decreased [DCC pilot 3.3% (1 of 30) vs. HC 40.0% (4 of 10 infants with data),  = 0.012. No infants were polycythemic.

CONCLUSIONS

These pilot data suggest cord clamping can be delayed to 120 s during elective CD without increased risk of excessive maternal blood loss. More aggressive prevention of infant heat loss may be warranted. A randomized trial to evaluate long-term maternal and infant outcomes is indicated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trials.gov, NCT02229162; registered: 1 September, 2014.

摘要

背景

延迟脐带结扎(DCC)可降低婴儿期缺铁的发生率。美国妇产科学院呼吁开展研究,以确定剖宫产(CD)时脐带结扎的最佳时机。我们的目标是进行一项试点试验,研究择期剖宫产(CD)期间延迟脐带结扎(DCC)对母婴二元组的安全性。

方法

2013年10月至2014年9月期间,我们招募了39对母婴二元组[23对在90秒时结扎,16对在120秒时结扎;(DCC试点组)]。我们从电子病历(EMR)中提取了2012年1月至2013年6月期间分娩且未进行DCC的历史对照(HC)数据(n = 112)。

结果

与HC组相比,37名母亲和30名婴儿的可用数据显示,估计平均母体失血量(EBL)低174(95%CI:61 - 286)mL[(EBL)均值(标准差)mL]:DCC试点组为691(218),而HC组为864(442),P = 0.003,且母体输血发生率较低,DCC试点组为2.7%,HC组为18.8%,P = 0.016。在其他预先定义的母体失血过多的定义中,DCC试点组和HC组之间无显著组间差异:a)EBL > 800 ml,分别为21.6%和38.8%,P = 0.07;或b)术后血红蛋白/术前血红蛋白 < 80%,分别为16.7%和20.6%,P = 0.81。两组间新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院率也无统计学显著差异,DCC试点组为8.1%,HC组为7.1%,P = 1.0,但研究对象中新生儿冷应激或体温过低(≤36.2°C)的发生率较高,DCC试点组为27.0%,HC组为11.9%,P = 0.038。新生儿贫血患病率降低[DCC试点组为3.3%(30例中的1例),HC组为40.0%(有数据的10例婴儿中的4例),P = 0.012。无婴儿发生红细胞增多症。

结论

这些试点数据表明,择期剖宫产期间脐带结扎可延迟至120秒,而不会增加母体失血过多的风险。可能需要更积极地预防婴儿热量损失。有必要进行一项随机试验来评估母婴的长期结局。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02229162;注册时间:2014年9月1日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccae/6031144/19bd57f69ab4/40748_2018_83_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccae/6031144/19bd57f69ab4/40748_2018_83_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccae/6031144/19bd57f69ab4/40748_2018_83_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Delayed cord clamping during elective cesarean deliveries: results of a pilot safety trial.择期剖宫产术中延迟脐带结扎:一项初步安全性试验的结果
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2018 Jul 4;4:16. doi: 10.1186/s40748-018-0083-3. eCollection 2018.
2
Delayed umbilical cord clamping in elective and nonelective term Cesarean delivery.择期及非择期足月剖宫产术中延迟脐带结扎
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2024 Feb;53(2):102717. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102717. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
3
Maternal bleeding complications and neonatal outcomes following early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in cesarean deliveries for very low birthweight infants.剖宫产时早期与延迟夹闭脐带对极低出生体重儿产妇出血并发症和新生儿结局的影响。
J Perinatol. 2023 Jan;43(1):39-43. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01558-4. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
4
Effect of Delayed vs Immediate Umbilical Cord Clamping on Maternal Blood Loss in Term Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.延迟与即刻断脐对足月剖宫产产妇失血的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Nov 19;322(19):1869-1876. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.15995.
5
Impact of a delayed cord clamping protocol on maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing term cesarean section.延迟脐带夹闭方案对行择期足月剖宫产产妇及新生儿结局的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(23):4607-4611. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1857357. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
6
Implementing Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping in Cesarean Birth Using a Novel Method: A Pilot Study of Feasibility and Safety.采用新方法在剖宫产中实施延迟脐带夹闭:一项可行性和安全性的初步研究。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):109-118. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13075. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
7
Placental cord drainage vs delayed cord clamping at elective caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial.胎盘脐带结扎与择期剖宫产时延迟脐带夹闭的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Apr;64(2):120-127. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13756. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
8
Does delayed cord clamping result in higher maternal blood loss in primary cesarean sections? A retrospective comparative study.延迟断脐是否会导致初次剖宫产术中产妇失血增加?一项回顾性对比研究。
J Perinat Med. 2024 Apr 29;52(5):494-500. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0450. Print 2024 Jun 25.
9
Delayed Cord Clamping versus Early Cord Clamping in Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.择期剖宫产时延迟与早期断脐的随机对照试验。
Neonatology. 2019;116(3):252-259. doi: 10.1159/000500325. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
10
Delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping for near-term infants born to preeclamptic mothers; a randomized controlled trial.延迟与早期断脐对子痫前期产妇足月新生儿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04831-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Delayed cord clamping in China: a cross-sectional survey of clinical practices and perceptions in Jiangsu Province.中国延迟脐带结扎:江苏省临床实践与认知的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 13;15(6):e098523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098523.
2
Extra-uterine placental transfusion and intact-cord stabilisation of infants in caesarean sections: an intervention development and pilot-study (INTACT-1).剖宫产术中婴儿的宫外胎盘输血及脐带完整稳定处理:一项干预措施开发与试点研究(INTACT-1)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 9;25(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07641-w.
3
Effects of cord clamping timing in at-term elective cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a randomized trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Iron status of toddlers, nonpregnant females, and pregnant females in the United States.美国幼儿、非孕女性和孕女性的铁营养状况。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Dec;106(Suppl 6):1640S-1646S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.155978. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
2
Maternal outcomes following the initiation of an institutional delayed cord clamping protocol: an observational case-control study.机构延迟脐带结扎方案实施后的产妇结局:一项观察性病例对照研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Jan;31(2):197-201. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1280018. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
Effect of Delayed Cord Clamping on Neurodevelopment at 4 Years of Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
足月择期剖宫产时脐带结扎时机对母婴结局的影响:一项随机试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):1883-1891. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07054-0. Epub 2023 May 10.
4
Maternal implications of placental transfusion.胎盘输血的母体影响。
Semin Perinatol. 2023 Jun;47(4):151733. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2023.151733. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
5
Early essential newborn care for cesarean section newborns in China: study protocol for a multi-centered randomized controlled trial.中国剖宫产新生儿早期基本保健:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Aug 19;23(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06615-z.
6
Delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping for near-term infants born to preeclamptic mothers; a randomized controlled trial.延迟与早期断脐对子痫前期产妇足月新生儿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04831-8.
7
The Association Between Placental Residual Blood Volume and Two Placental Transfusion Methods After Delivery at Term.足月分娩后胎盘残余血量与两种胎盘输血方法之间的关联
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 8;9:768075. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.768075. eCollection 2021.
8
Implementation of Delayed Cord Clamping for 3 Min During Term Cesarean Sections Does Not Influence Maternal Blood Loss.足月剖宫产术中实施3分钟延迟脐带结扎不影响产妇失血量。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jun 22;9:662538. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.662538. eCollection 2021.
9
Effect of Delayed vs Immediate Umbilical Cord Clamping on Maternal Blood Loss in Term Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.延迟与即刻断脐对足月剖宫产产妇失血的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Nov 19;322(19):1869-1876. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.15995.
10
Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcomes.脐带夹闭时机对母婴结局的影响:早期夹闭与延迟夹闭的比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Sep;300(3):531-543. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05215-8. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
延迟脐带夹闭对 4 岁时神经发育的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jul;169(7):631-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0358.
4
Long-term Follow-up of Placental Transfusion in Full-term Infants.足月婴儿胎盘输血的长期随访
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jul;169(7):623-4. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0431.
5
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes.足月儿脐带结扎时机对母婴结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 11;2013(7):CD004074. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3.
6
Committee Opinion No.543: Timing of umbilical cord clamping after birth.委员会意见 No.543:出生后脐带夹闭的时机。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;120(6):1522-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000423817.47165.48.
7
Early umbilical cord clamping increases the risk of neonatal anaemia and infant iron deficiency.早期脐带 clamping 会增加新生儿贫血和婴儿缺铁的风险。 (注:原文中“clamping”可能有误,推测可能是“cutting”即“剪断”,若按此正确词汇翻译为“早期脐带剪断会增加新生儿贫血和婴儿缺铁的风险。” )
Evid Based Med. 2012 Dec;17(6):179-80. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2012-100557. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
8
Effect of delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping on neonatal outcomes and iron status at 4 months: a randomised controlled trial.延迟与早期断脐对新生儿结局及 4 月龄时铁状态的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 15;343:d7157. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7157.
9
Visual estimation versus gravimetric measurement of postpartum blood loss: a prospective cohort study.视觉估计与产后失血量的重量测量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jun;283(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1522-1. Epub 2010 May 28.
10
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.