• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

记住或知道自己的感受:抑郁和焦虑症状预测情绪自我报告过程中的检索过程。

Remembering or knowing how we felt: Depression and anxiety symptoms predict retrieval processes during emotional self-report.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Emotion. 2019 Apr;19(3):465-479. doi: 10.1037/emo0000436. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1037/emo0000436
PMID:29999380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6330167/
Abstract

Researchers and clinicians routinely rely on patients' retrospective emotional self-reports to guide diagnosis and treatment, despite evidence of impaired autobiographical memory and retrieval of emotional information in depression and anxiety. To clarify the nature and specificity of these impairments, we conducted two large online data collections (Study 1, = 1,983; Study 2, = 900) examining whether depression and/or anxiety symptoms would uniquely predict the use of self-reported episodic (i.e., remembering) and/or semantic (i.e., knowing) retrieval when rating one's positive and negative emotional experiences over different time frames. Participants were randomly assigned to one of six time frames (ranging from to ) and were asked to rate how intensely they felt each of four emotions, anxious, sad, calm, and happy, over that period. Following each rating, they were asked several follow-up prompts assessing their perceived reliance on episodic and/or semantic information to rate how they felt, using procedures adapted from the traditional "remember/know" paradigm (Tulving, 1985). Across both studies, depression and anxiety symptoms each uniquely predicted increased likelihood of remembering across emotion types, and decreased likelihood of knowing how one felt when rating positive emotion types. Implications for the theory and treatment of emotion-related memory disturbances in depression and anxiety, and for dual-process theories of memory retrieval more generally, are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

研究人员和临床医生通常依赖患者的回顾性情绪自我报告来指导诊断和治疗,尽管有证据表明抑郁和焦虑会损害自传体记忆和情绪信息的检索。为了阐明这些损伤的性质和特异性,我们进行了两项大型在线数据收集研究(研究 1,n=1983;研究 2,n=900),考察了抑郁和/或焦虑症状是否会独特地预测在不同时间框架内对积极和消极情绪体验进行自我报告的情节(即记忆)和/或语义(即知道)检索时的使用。参与者被随机分配到六个时间框架之一(范围从 到 ),并被要求在该时间段内对四种情绪(焦虑、悲伤、平静和快乐)的每个情绪的强度进行评分。在每次评分后,他们会被问到几个后续提示,评估他们对情节和/或语义信息的感知依赖程度,以评估他们如何评价自己的感受,使用的程序改编自传统的“记得/知道”范式(Tulving,1985)。在两项研究中,抑郁和焦虑症状都独特地预测了对不同情绪类型的记忆的可能性增加,而对积极情绪类型的自我感觉的了解可能性降低。这对抑郁和焦虑中与情绪相关的记忆障碍的理论和治疗以及更普遍的记忆检索双加工理论具有启示意义。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e6/6330167/da6ebc63105a/nihms974305f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e6/6330167/15ff12fe49c2/nihms974305f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e6/6330167/da6ebc63105a/nihms974305f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e6/6330167/15ff12fe49c2/nihms974305f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e6/6330167/da6ebc63105a/nihms974305f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Remembering or knowing how we felt: Depression and anxiety symptoms predict retrieval processes during emotional self-report.记住或知道自己的感受:抑郁和焦虑症状预测情绪自我报告过程中的检索过程。
Emotion. 2019 Apr;19(3):465-479. doi: 10.1037/emo0000436. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
2
Testing the impact of emotional mood and cue characteristics on detailed autobiographical memory retrieval.测试情绪心境和线索特征对详细自传体记忆检索的影响。
Emotion. 2020 Sep;20(6):965-979. doi: 10.1037/emo0000603. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
3
The effects of time frames on self-report.时间框架对自我报告的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0201655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201655. eCollection 2018.
4
[Episodic autobiographical memory in depression: a review].[抑郁症中的情景性自传体记忆:综述]
Encephale. 2006 Oct;32(5 Pt 1):781-8. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76231-5.
5
Emotional Reaction to viewing one's own epileptic seizure.观看自身癫痫发作时的情绪反应。
Seizure. 2019 Jan;64:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
6
More emotional facial expressions during episodic than during semantic autobiographical retrieval.与语义性自传体记忆提取相比,情景性记忆提取过程中会出现更多情绪化的面部表情。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Apr;16(2):374-81. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0397-9.
7
Collaborative remembering of emotional autobiographical memories: Implications for emotion regulation and collective memory.情绪自传体记忆的协同回忆:对情绪调节和集体记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jan;148(1):65-79. doi: 10.1037/xge0000468. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
8
Meta-emotions in daily life: Associations with emotional awareness and depression.日常生活中的元情绪:与情绪意识和抑郁的关系。
Emotion. 2019 Aug;19(5):776-787. doi: 10.1037/emo0000488. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
9
Effect of anxiety on memory for emotional information in older adults.焦虑对老年人情绪信息记忆的影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Apr;21(4):362-368. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1093601. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
10
The impact of focused attention on subsequent emotional recollection: A functional MRI investigation.集中注意力对后续情绪回忆的影响:一项功能磁共振研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107338. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107338. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Hand gesture performance is impaired in major depressive disorder: A matter of working memory performance?手势表演在重度抑郁症中受损:与工作记忆表现有关?
J Affect Disord. 2021 Sep 1;292:81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.055. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
Measuring stress in clinical and nonclinical subjects using a German adaptation of the Perceived Stress Scale.使用德国版的感知压力量表测量临床和非临床受试者的压力。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2020 May-Aug;20(2):173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 May 22.
3
Varieties of recollective experience.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analytic review of overgeneral memory: The role of trauma history, mood, and the presence of posttraumatic stress disorder.一项关于过度泛化记忆的元分析综述:创伤史、情绪和创伤后应激障碍的存在的作用。
Psychol Trauma. 2016 Mar;8(2):157-64. doi: 10.1037/tra0000027. Epub 2015 May 11.
2
Episodic memories in anxiety disorders: clinical implications.焦虑症中的情景记忆:临床意义。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Apr 24;8:131. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00131. eCollection 2014.
3
Mood-congruent memory in depression - the influence of personal relevance and emotional context.
回忆体验的多样性。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 3;137:107295. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107295. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
4
Opposite environmental gating of the experienced utility ('liking') and decision utility ('wanting') of heroin versus cocaine in animals and humans: implications for computational neuroscience.在动物和人类中,经验效用(“喜欢”)和决策效用(“想要”)对海洛因和可卡因的环境门控作用相反:对计算神经科学的启示。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Aug;236(8):2451-2471. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05318-9. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
抑郁中的情绪一致性记忆——个人相关性和情绪背景的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Mar 30;215(3):606-13. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.11.027. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
4
Those were the days: memory bias for the frequency of positive events, depression, and self-enhancement.就是那些日子:对积极事件频率的记忆偏差、抑郁和自我提升。
Memory. 2014;22(8):925-36. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.856924. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
5
Autobiographical memory bias in social anxiety.社交焦虑中的自传体记忆偏差。
Memory. 2014;22(8):890-7. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.844261. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
6
Processing mode during repetitive thinking in socially anxious individuals: evidence for a maladaptive experiential mode.在社交焦虑个体中进行重复思考时的加工模式:适应不良的体验模式的证据。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;43(4):1064-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 May 19.
7
Hippocampal activity during recognition memory co-varies with the accuracy and confidence of source memory judgments.在再认记忆过程中,海马体的活动与源记忆判断的准确性和置信度呈正相关。
Hippocampus. 2012 Jun;22(6):1429-37. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20982. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
8
A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.连续双重加工模型的记忆/知道判断。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1025-54. doi: 10.1037/a0020874.
9
Cooperation between the hippocampus and the striatum during episodic encoding.海马体和纹状体在情景式记忆编码过程中的合作。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jul;23(7):1597-608. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21549. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
10
Cognition and depression: current status and future directions.认知与抑郁:现状与未来方向。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:285-312. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131305.