Suppr超能文献

连续双重加工模型的记忆/知道判断。

A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2010 Oct;117(4):1025-54. doi: 10.1037/a0020874.

Abstract

The dual-process theory of recognition memory holds that recognition decisions can be based on recollection or familiarity, and the remember/know procedure is widely used to investigate those 2 processes. Dual-process theory in general and the remember/know procedure in particular have been challenged by an alternative strength-based interpretation based on signal-detection theory, which holds that remember judgments simply reflect stronger memories than do know judgments. Although supported by a considerable body of research, the signal-detection account is difficult to reconcile with G. Mandler's (1980) classic "butcher-on-the-bus" phenomenon (i.e., strong, familiarity-based recognition). In this article, a new signal-detection model is proposed that does not deny either the validity of dual-process theory or the possibility that remember/know judgments can-when used in the right way-help to distinguish between memories that are largely recollection based from those that are largely familiarity based. It does, however, agree with all prior signal-detection-based critiques of the remember/know procedure, which hold that, as it is ordinarily used, the procedure mainly distinguishes strong memories from weak memories (not recollection from familiarity).

摘要

双加工理论的识别记忆认为,识别决策可以基于记忆或熟悉度,而“记得/知道”程序被广泛用于研究这两个过程。一般来说,双加工理论,特别是“记得/知道”程序,受到了基于信号检测理论的替代强度解释的挑战,该解释认为,“记得”判断仅仅反映了比“知道”判断更强的记忆。尽管得到了相当多的研究支持,但信号检测解释很难与 G. 曼德勒(1980)的经典“公车上的屠夫”现象(即强烈的、基于熟悉度的识别)相协调。在本文中,提出了一种新的信号检测模型,该模型既不否认双加工理论的有效性,也不否认“记得/知道”判断可以——当以正确的方式使用时——有助于区分主要基于记忆的记忆和主要基于熟悉度的记忆。然而,它与所有先前基于信号检测的对“记得/知道”程序的批评意见一致,即该程序通常主要区分强记忆和弱记忆(而不是记忆和熟悉度)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验