• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪自传体记忆的协同回忆:对情绪调节和集体记忆的影响。

Collaborative remembering of emotional autobiographical memories: Implications for emotion regulation and collective memory.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Center on Autobiographical Memory Research (Conamore).

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jan;148(1):65-79. doi: 10.1037/xge0000468. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000468
PMID:30211580
Abstract

People frequently engage in conversation about shared autobiographical events from their lives, particularly those with emotional significance. The pervasiveness of this practice raises the question whether shared memory reconstruction has the power to influence the memory and emotions associated with such events. We developed a novel paradigm that combined the strengths of the methods from autobiographical and collaborative memory research traditions to examine such consequences. We selected a shared, real-life autobiographical event of an exam, and asked students to recall their memory of taking a recent exam where they provided a group and/or personal narrative of this autobiographical event. Students first recalled the event either collaboratively (C) or individually (I), followed by a final individual (I) recall by all. Valence ratings as well as the emotional tone of the narratives converged to show that prior collaborative remembering down-regulated negative emotion and enhanced the positive emotional tone of the memories. The recalled detail in the narratives indicated that at initial recall members of collaborative groups reported fewer internal details than those who recalled alone, and reported more external details in a later recall when working alone. Earlier collaboration also increased collective memory such that more of these details were shared among prior group members in their later individual recall compared with those who did not collaborate before. We discuss the influence of collaborative remembering on shaping memory and emotion for autobiographical events as well as the potential mechanisms that promote collective autobiographical memory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

人们经常会就生活中共同的自传体事件进行交流,尤其是那些具有情感意义的事件。这种普遍存在的现象引发了一个问题,即共同的记忆重构是否有能力影响与这些事件相关的记忆和情感。我们开发了一种新的范式,结合了自传体记忆和合作记忆研究传统的方法优势,来检验这种后果。我们选择了一个共同的、真实的生活自传体事件——考试,并要求学生回忆他们最近参加考试的记忆,他们提供了这个自传体事件的小组和/或个人叙述。学生们首先要么合作(C)回忆,要么单独(I)回忆,然后所有学生再次单独(I)回忆。情感评价以及叙述的情感基调趋于一致,表明先前的合作记忆下调了负面情绪,并增强了记忆的积极情感基调。叙述中的回忆细节表明,在最初的回忆中,合作小组的成员比单独回忆的成员报告的内部细节更少,而在单独回忆时报告的外部细节更多。早期的合作也增加了集体记忆,因此,与那些没有合作过的人相比,之前的小组成员在后来的个人回忆中分享了更多的这些细节。我们讨论了合作记忆对塑造自传体事件的记忆和情感的影响,以及促进集体自传体记忆的潜在机制。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2018 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Collaborative remembering of emotional autobiographical memories: Implications for emotion regulation and collective memory.情绪自传体记忆的协同回忆:对情绪调节和集体记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jan;148(1):65-79. doi: 10.1037/xge0000468. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
2
Testing the impact of emotional mood and cue characteristics on detailed autobiographical memory retrieval.测试情绪心境和线索特征对详细自传体记忆检索的影响。
Emotion. 2020 Sep;20(6):965-979. doi: 10.1037/emo0000603. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
3
Effects of collaboration on the qualities of autobiographical recall in strangers, friends, and siblings: both remembering partner and communication processes matter.合作对陌生人、朋友和兄弟姐妹自传体回忆质量的影响:记住伙伴和沟通过程都很重要。
Memory. 2020 Mar;28(3):399-416. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1727521. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
More than a feeling: Emotional cues impact the access and experience of autobiographical memories.不止是一种感觉:情感线索影响自传体记忆的提取和体验。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jul;45(5):731-744. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0691-6.
5
Emotional intensity in episodic autobiographical memory and counterfactual thinking.情景自传体记忆和反事实思维中的情绪强度
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Feb;48:283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.12.013. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
6
Mood regulation upon remembering open memories.回忆开放性记忆时的情绪调节。
Memory. 2023 Mar;31(3):357-366. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2022.2156545. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
7
[Experimental study of the emotional valence of involuntarily recalled autobiographical memories].[非自愿回忆的自传体记忆的情感效价的实验研究]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2006 Oct;77(4):351-9. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.77.351.
8
Autobiographical remembering regulates emotions: a functional perspective.自传体记忆调节情绪:一种功能视角。
Memory. 2018 Jan;26(1):15-28. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1316510. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
9
Remembering Election Night 2016: Subjective but not objective metrics of autobiographical memory vary with political affiliation, affective valence, and surprise.记住 2016 年选举之夜:自传体记忆的主观而非客观指标随政治派别、情感效价和惊讶程度而变化。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Feb;151(2):390-409. doi: 10.1037/xge0001080. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
10
Emotional closure in autobiographical memories: phenomenology and involuntary remembering.自传体记忆中的情绪封闭:现象学与非自愿记忆。
Memory. 2023 Apr;31(4):560-572. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2023.2181485. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing autobiographical memory consistency: Machine and human approaches.评估自传体记忆的一致性:机器与人工方法
Behav Res Methods. 2025 May 6;57(6):163. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02690-7.
2
Touching at a distance: the elaboration of communicative functions from the perspective of the interactants.远距离接触:从互动者视角阐述交际功能
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1497289. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497289. eCollection 2024.
3
Update on "Emotion and autobiographical memory": 14 years of advances in understanding functions, constructions, and consequences.
《“情感与自传体记忆”的最新进展》:十四年来在理解其功能、构建及影响方面的进展
Phys Life Rev. 2024 Dec;51:255-272. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2024.10.005. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
4
Collaborative imagination synchronizes representations of the future and fosters social connection in the present.协作想象同步了未来的表现形式,并促进了当下的社会联系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 18;121(25):e2318292121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2318292121. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
5
Collective memory: between individual systems of consciousness and social systems.集体记忆:在个体意识系统与社会系统之间。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 12;14:1238272. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1238272. eCollection 2023.
6
Knowledge of Chosen Family History and Depressive Symptoms in Sexual Minority Women.性少数女性中选择的家族史与抑郁症状的相关知识
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 15;12:624641. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624641. eCollection 2021.
7
Exploring Cognitive Dissonance on a Ski Mountaineering Traverse: A Personal Narrative of an Expedition to ISHINCA (5530 m) in PERU.探索滑雪登山穿越中的认知失调:一次秘鲁伊申卡峰(5530米)探险之旅的个人叙事
Sports (Basel). 2019 Dec 11;7(12):249. doi: 10.3390/sports7120249.