Suppr超能文献

术前短程放疗和长程放化疗治疗局部进展期直肠癌:长期生存数据的荟萃分析与试验序贯分析。

Preoperative short-course radiotherapy and long-course radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of long-term survival data.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jul 12;13(7):e0200142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200142. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The role of preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) in rectal cancer treatment, when compared to long-course radiochemotherapy (LCRT), is still controversial. Thus the meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to evaluate the long-term survival of SCRT and LCRT as therapeutic regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to August 2017 for eligible studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) of overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and local recurrence (LR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and TSA was applied.

RESULTS

11 studies with 1984 patients were included. There was no significant difference in OS (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.75-1.13, p = 0.44), DFS (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.79-1.12, p = 0.50) and LR (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.49-1.08, p = 0.11) between SCRT and LCRT groups. TSA suggested firm evidence for lacking on average a -10% relative risk reduction (RRR) in 4-year OS but no statistical significance in 4-year DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative SCRT is as effective as LCRT for locally advanced colorectal cancer in long-term survival. SCRT could be preferential while facing long waiting lists or lacking medical resource.

摘要

背景与目的

术前短程放疗(SCRT)与长程放化疗(LCRT)相比,在直肠癌治疗中的作用仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了这项荟萃分析,并采用试验序贯分析(TSA)来评估 SCRT 和 LCRT 作为局部晚期直肠癌的治疗方案的长期生存情况。

材料与方法

我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,以获取截至 2017 年 8 月的相关研究。计算了总生存(OS)、无病生存(DFS)和局部复发(LR)的风险比(HR)或优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI),并进行了 TSA。

结果

共纳入了 11 项研究,包含 1984 例患者。SCRT 组和 LCRT 组在 OS(HR = 0.92,95%CI:0.75-1.13,p = 0.44)、DFS(HR = 0.94,95%CI:0.79-1.12,p = 0.50)和 LR(OR = 0.73,95%CI:0.49-1.08,p = 0.11)方面均无显著差异。TSA 提示,在 4 年 OS 方面,平均缺乏 -10%的相对风险降低(RRR)的证据不足,但在 4 年 DFS 方面无统计学意义。

结论

术前 SCRT 与 LCRT 对局部晚期结直肠癌的长期生存效果相当。在面临较长的等待名单或缺乏医疗资源的情况下,SCRT 可能是优选方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85df/6042715/1e26eec3d1b0/pone.0200142.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验