Watts Hannah F, Kerem Yaniv, Kulstad Erik B
Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center, 4440 W. 95 St., Oak Lawn, USA.
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012 Apr;5(2):131-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.96481.
Severity-of-illness scoring systems have primarily been developed for, and validated in, younger trauma patients.
We sought to determine the accuracy of the injury severity score (ISS) and the revised trauma score (RTS) in predicting mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS) in trauma patients over the age of 65 treated in our emergency department (ED).
Using the Illinois Trauma Registry, we identified all patients 65 years and older treated in our level I trauma facility from January 2004 to November 2007. The primary outcome was death; the secondary outcome was overall hospital length of stay (LOS). We measured associations between scores and outcomes with binary logistic and linear regression.
A total of 347 patients, 65 years of age and older were treated in our hospital during the study period. Median age was 76 years (IQR 69-82), with median ISS 13 (IQR 8-17), and median RTS 7.8 (IQR 7.1-7.8). Overall mortality was 24%. A higher value for ISS showed a positive correlation with likelihood of death, which although statistically significant, was numerically small (OR=1.10, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.13, P<0.001). An elevated RTS had an inverse correlation to likelihood of death that was also statistically significant (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.58, P<0.001). Total hospital LOS increased with increasing ISS, with statistical significance decreasing at the highest levels of ISS, but an increase in RTS not confirming the predicted decrease in total hospital LOS consistently across all ranges of RTS.
The ISS and the RTS were better predictors of mortality than hypothesized, but had limited correlation with hospital LOS in elderly trauma patients. Although there may be some utility in these scores when applied to the elderly population, caution is warranted if attempting to predict the prognosis of patients.
疾病严重程度评分系统主要是为年轻创伤患者开发并在他们身上验证的。
我们试图确定损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和修订创伤评分(RTS)在预测我院急诊科治疗的65岁以上创伤患者死亡率和住院时间(LOS)方面的准确性。
利用伊利诺伊州创伤登记处的数据,我们确定了2004年1月至2007年11月在我院一级创伤中心接受治疗的所有65岁及以上患者。主要结局是死亡;次要结局是总体住院时间(LOS)。我们用二元逻辑回归和线性回归测量评分与结局之间的关联。
研究期间我院共治疗了347例65岁及以上患者。中位年龄为76岁(四分位间距69 - 82岁),中位ISS为13(四分位间距8 - 17),中位RTS为7.8(四分位间距7.1 - 7.8)。总体死亡率为24%。较高的ISS值与死亡可能性呈正相关,虽然在统计学上有显著意义,但数值较小(OR = 1.10,95% CI 1.06至1.13,P < 0.001)。升高的RTS与死亡可能性呈负相关,这在统计学上也有显著意义(OR = 0.48,95% CI 0.39至0.58,P < 0.001)。总住院LOS随ISS增加而增加,在最高ISS水平时统计学显著性降低,但RTS增加并未在RTS的所有范围内一致证实总住院LOS的预测性降低。
ISS和RTS对死亡率的预测比预期更好,但与老年创伤患者的住院LOS相关性有限。虽然这些评分应用于老年人群体时可能有一定作用,但在试图预测患者预后时仍需谨慎。