• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年创伤患者中修订的创伤和损伤严重程度评分的评估。

Evaluation of the revised trauma and injury severity scores in elderly trauma patients.

作者信息

Watts Hannah F, Kerem Yaniv, Kulstad Erik B

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center, 4440 W. 95 St., Oak Lawn, USA.

出版信息

J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012 Apr;5(2):131-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.96481.

DOI:10.4103/0974-2700.96481
PMID:22787342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3391836/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severity-of-illness scoring systems have primarily been developed for, and validated in, younger trauma patients.

AIMS

We sought to determine the accuracy of the injury severity score (ISS) and the revised trauma score (RTS) in predicting mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS) in trauma patients over the age of 65 treated in our emergency department (ED).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Illinois Trauma Registry, we identified all patients 65 years and older treated in our level I trauma facility from January 2004 to November 2007. The primary outcome was death; the secondary outcome was overall hospital length of stay (LOS). We measured associations between scores and outcomes with binary logistic and linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 347 patients, 65 years of age and older were treated in our hospital during the study period. Median age was 76 years (IQR 69-82), with median ISS 13 (IQR 8-17), and median RTS 7.8 (IQR 7.1-7.8). Overall mortality was 24%. A higher value for ISS showed a positive correlation with likelihood of death, which although statistically significant, was numerically small (OR=1.10, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.13, P<0.001). An elevated RTS had an inverse correlation to likelihood of death that was also statistically significant (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.58, P<0.001). Total hospital LOS increased with increasing ISS, with statistical significance decreasing at the highest levels of ISS, but an increase in RTS not confirming the predicted decrease in total hospital LOS consistently across all ranges of RTS.

CONCLUSIONS

The ISS and the RTS were better predictors of mortality than hypothesized, but had limited correlation with hospital LOS in elderly trauma patients. Although there may be some utility in these scores when applied to the elderly population, caution is warranted if attempting to predict the prognosis of patients.

摘要

背景

疾病严重程度评分系统主要是为年轻创伤患者开发并在他们身上验证的。

目的

我们试图确定损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和修订创伤评分(RTS)在预测我院急诊科治疗的65岁以上创伤患者死亡率和住院时间(LOS)方面的准确性。

材料与方法

利用伊利诺伊州创伤登记处的数据,我们确定了2004年1月至2007年11月在我院一级创伤中心接受治疗的所有65岁及以上患者。主要结局是死亡;次要结局是总体住院时间(LOS)。我们用二元逻辑回归和线性回归测量评分与结局之间的关联。

结果

研究期间我院共治疗了347例65岁及以上患者。中位年龄为76岁(四分位间距69 - 82岁),中位ISS为13(四分位间距8 - 17),中位RTS为7.8(四分位间距7.1 - 7.8)。总体死亡率为24%。较高的ISS值与死亡可能性呈正相关,虽然在统计学上有显著意义,但数值较小(OR = 1.10,95% CI 1.06至1.13,P < 0.001)。升高的RTS与死亡可能性呈负相关,这在统计学上也有显著意义(OR = 0.48,95% CI 0.39至0.58,P < 0.001)。总住院LOS随ISS增加而增加,在最高ISS水平时统计学显著性降低,但RTS增加并未在RTS的所有范围内一致证实总住院LOS的预测性降低。

结论

ISS和RTS对死亡率的预测比预期更好,但与老年创伤患者的住院LOS相关性有限。虽然这些评分应用于老年人群体时可能有一定作用,但在试图预测患者预后时仍需谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a06/3391836/1e628fff6d96/JETS-5-131-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a06/3391836/10e31d9a21db/JETS-5-131-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a06/3391836/1e628fff6d96/JETS-5-131-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a06/3391836/10e31d9a21db/JETS-5-131-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a06/3391836/1e628fff6d96/JETS-5-131-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the revised trauma and injury severity scores in elderly trauma patients.老年创伤患者中修订的创伤和损伤严重程度评分的评估。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2012 Apr;5(2):131-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.96481.
2
Comparison of Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Revised Trauma Score in Predicting the Mortality and Prolonged ICU Stay of Traumatic Young Children: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.损伤严重度评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表和改良创伤评分在预测创伤性幼儿死亡率及重症监护病房长期住院情况中的比较:一项横断面回顾性研究
Emerg Med Int. 2019 Dec 1;2019:5453624. doi: 10.1155/2019/5453624. eCollection 2019.
3
Correlation Between the Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score: Implications for Prehospital Trauma Triage.修订创伤评分与损伤严重程度评分之间的相关性:对院前创伤分诊的启示
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):263-270. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1489019. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
4
Trauma in the elderly: intensive care unit resource use and outcome.老年人创伤:重症监护病房资源利用与结局
J Trauma. 2002 Sep;53(3):407-14. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200209000-00001.
5
Predicting mortality, hospital length of stay and need for surgery in pediatric trauma patients.预测小儿创伤患者的死亡率、住院时间及手术需求。
Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Dec;20(6):339-342. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
6
Rethinking the definition of major trauma: The need for trauma intervention outperforms Injury Severity Score and Revised Trauma Score in 38 adult and pediatric trauma centers.重新思考严重创伤的定义:在 38 家成人和儿科创伤中心,创伤干预的需要优于损伤严重度评分和修正创伤评分。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Sep;87(3):658-665. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002402.
7
Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study.创伤人群中的快速急诊医学评分(REMS):一项回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 May 2;4(5):e004738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004738.
8
Validation of international trauma scoring systems in urban trauma centres in India.国际创伤评分系统在印度城市创伤中心的验证
Injury. 2016 Nov;47(11):2459-2464. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
9
Early femur fracture fixation is associated with a reduction in pulmonary complications and hospital charges: a decade of experience with 1,376 diaphyseal femur fractures.早期股骨骨折固定可降低肺部并发症和住院费用:1376 例股骨干骨折 10 年经验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1442-8; discussion 1448-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782696.
10
The importance of the injury severity scores and revised trauma scores for moderate traumas: A state hospital experience.损伤严重度评分和修订创伤评分在中度创伤中的重要性:一家州立医院的经验
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Mar;26(2):242-246. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.06623.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing polytrauma care: developing and validating machine learning models for early mortality prediction.推进多发伤救治:开发和验证用于早期死亡率预测的机器学习模型。
J Transl Med. 2023 Sep 25;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04487-8.
2
Predictors of mortality in patients with geriatric trauma in the emergency service.急诊科老年创伤患者死亡的预测因素。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Jul 17;69(7):e20230035. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230035. eCollection 2023.
3
A Novel Strategy for Predicting 72-h Mortality After Admission in Patients With Polytrauma: A Study on the Development and Validation of a Web-Based Calculator.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.《伤员现场分类指南:国家现场分类专家小组 2011 年的建议》。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012 Jan 13;61(RR-1):1-20.
2
Identification of an age cutoff for increased mortality in patients with elderly trauma.确定老年创伤患者死亡率增加的年龄界限。
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;28(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.10.027.
3
An appraisal of trauma in the elderly.老年人创伤评估
一种预测多发伤患者入院后72小时死亡率的新策略:一项基于网络计算器的开发与验证研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 14;9:799811. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.799811. eCollection 2022.
4
Beyond Mortality: Does Trauma-related Injury Severity Score Predict Complications or Lengths of Stay Using a Large Administrative Dataset.超越死亡率:使用大型行政数据集,创伤相关损伤严重程度评分能否预测并发症或住院时间?
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2021 Jul-Sep;14(3):143-147. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_125_20. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Additional data from clinical examination on site significantly but marginally improve predictive accuracy of the Revised Trauma Score for major complications during Helicopter Emergency Medical Service missions.现场临床检查的额外数据显著但略微提高了直升机紧急医疗服务任务期间修订创伤评分对主要并发症的预测准确性。
Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jun;14(4):865-870. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.61884. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
6
Missing patients in "Major Trauma Registry" of Navarre: incidence and pattern.纳瓦拉“重大创伤登记处”中的失访患者:发病率及模式
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Oct;43(5):671-683. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0717-y. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
7
Predictors of early versus late mortality in pelvic trauma patients.骨盆创伤患者早期与晚期死亡率的预测因素。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 10;24:27. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0220-9.
8
Prevalence of Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma in Elders Admitted to a Reference Hospital in Northeastern Brazil.巴西东北部一家参考医院收治的老年人口腔颌面部创伤患病率
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0135813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135813. eCollection 2015.
Am Surg. 2007 Apr;73(4):354-8.
4
Statistical validation of the Revised Trauma Score.修订创伤评分的统计学验证
J Trauma. 2006 Feb;60(2):305-11. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000200840.89685.b0.
5
Road traffic injuries in the elderly.老年人的道路交通伤害。
Emerg Med J. 2006 Jan;23(1):42-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.023754.
6
Comorbidity and age are both independent predictors of length of hospitalization in trauma patients.合并症和年龄都是创伤患者住院时间的独立预测因素。
Can J Surg. 2005 Oct;48(5):361-6.
7
Is the revised trauma score still useful?修订后的创伤评分仍然有用吗?
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Nov;73(11):944-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-1433.2003.02833.x.
8
Elderly trauma patients with rib fractures are at greater risk of death and pneumonia.肋骨骨折的老年创伤患者死亡和患肺炎的风险更高。
J Trauma. 2003 Mar;54(3):478-85. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000037095.83469.4C.
9
Characteristics and outcomes of serious traumatic injury in older adults.老年人严重创伤性损伤的特征与转归
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Feb;50(2):215-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50051.x.
10
When is an elder old? Effect of preexisting conditions on mortality in geriatric trauma.老年人何时算老?既往疾病对老年创伤患者死亡率的影响。
J Trauma. 2002 Feb;52(2):242-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200202000-00007.