Rauhut Oliver W M, Piñuela Laura, Castanera Diego, García-Ramos José-Carlos, Sánchez Cela Irene
SNSB, Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Munich, Germany.
GeoBioCenter, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
PeerJ. 2018 Jul 5;6:e4963. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4963. eCollection 2018.
The Kimmeridgian Vega, Tereñes and Lastres formations of Asturias have yielded a rich vertebrate fauna, represented by both abundant tracks and osteological remains. However, skeletal remains of theropod dinosaurs are rare, and the diversity of theropod tracks has only partially been documented in the literature. Here we describe the only non-dental osteological theropod remain recovered so far, an isolated anterior caudal vertebra, as well as the largest theropod tracks found. The caudal vertebra can be shown to represent a megalosaurine megalosaurid and represents the largest theropod skeletal remain described from Europe so far. The tracks are also amongst the largest theropod footprints reported from any setting and can be assigned to two different morphotypes, one being characterized by its robustness and a weak mesaxony, and the other characterized by a strong mesaxony, representing a more gracile trackmaker. We discuss the recently proposed distinction between robust and gracile large to giant theropod tracks and their possible trackmakers during the Late Jurassic-Berriasian. In the absence of complete pedal skeletons of most basal tetanurans, the identity of the maker of Jurassic giant theropod tracks is difficult to establish. However, the notable robustness of megalosaurine megalosaurids fits well with the described robust morphotypes, whereas more slender large theropod tracks might have been made by a variety of basal tetanurans, including allosaurids, metriocanthosaurids or afrovenatorine megalosaurids, or even exceptionally large ceratosaurs. Concerning osteological remains of large theropods from the Late Jurassic of Europe, megalosaurids seem to be more abundant than previously recognized and occur in basically all Jurassic deposits where theropod remains have been found, whereas allosauroids seem to be represented by allosaurids in Western Europe and metriacanthosaurids in more eastern areas. Short-term fluctuations in sea level might have allowed exchange of large theropods between the islands that constituted Europe during the Late Jurassic.
阿斯图里亚斯的启莫里阶维加组、特雷涅斯组和拉斯特雷斯组产出了丰富的脊椎动物群,既有大量的足迹,也有骨骼化石。然而,兽脚亚目恐龙的骨骼化石却很稀少,兽脚亚目恐龙足迹的多样性在文献中也仅有部分记录。在此,我们描述了迄今为止发现的唯一一件非牙齿类的兽脚亚目骨骼化石,即一枚孤立的前尾椎,以及发现的最大的兽脚亚目恐龙足迹。这枚尾椎可确定属于巨齿龙科的巨齿龙类,是迄今为止欧洲描述的最大的兽脚亚目恐龙骨骼化石。这些足迹也是在任何环境中报道过的最大的兽脚亚目恐龙足迹之一,可分为两种不同的形态类型,一种以粗壮和弱中轴性为特征,另一种以强中轴性为特征,代表了一种更纤细的足迹制造者。我们讨论了最近提出的关于粗壮型和纤细型大型至巨型兽脚亚目恐龙足迹及其在晚侏罗世至贝里亚阶可能的足迹制造者之间的区别。由于大多数基础坚尾龙类没有完整的足部骨骼,侏罗纪巨型兽脚亚目恐龙足迹的制造者身份难以确定。然而,巨齿龙科的巨齿龙类显著的粗壮特征与所描述的粗壮形态类型非常吻合,而更纤细的大型兽脚亚目恐龙足迹可能是由多种基础坚尾龙类制造的,包括异特龙科、中棘龙科或非洲猎龙类巨齿龙科,甚至是异常大型的角鼻龙科。关于欧洲晚侏罗世大型兽脚亚目恐龙的骨骼化石,巨齿龙科似乎比之前认为的更为丰富,基本上出现在所有发现兽脚亚目恐龙化石的侏罗纪地层中,而异特龙超科在西欧似乎以异特龙科为代表,在更东部地区则以中棘龙科为代表。海平面的短期波动可能使得晚侏罗世构成欧洲的岛屿之间大型兽脚亚目恐龙能够相互交流。