• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种方法在软性输尿管镜碎石术中取石碎片的结果比较。

Comparison of Outcomes between Two Methods to Extract Stone Fragments during Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, 1-16 Yonegahama-Dori, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.

Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 30;2018:4526721. doi: 10.1155/2018/4526721. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1155/2018/4526721
PMID:30003099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5998190/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively compare the operative and clinical outcomes of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURSL) with stone extraction performed either by a surgeon (SE) who manipulates the retrieval basket or by having the surgical assistant (AE) manipulate the retrieval basket with the aim of clarifying which method provides a greater stone-free postoperative status.

METHODS

The study group consisted of patients who underwent fURSL with SE or AE at our institution between April 2015 and December 2016. Demographic, clinical, stone, and operative variables were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with a stone-free and non-stone-free status postoperatively.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 196 cases of renal stones treated using fURSL, with 109 who underwent AE and 87 who underwent SE. The rate of stone-free status was higher for the SE group (90.8%) than for the AE group (61.5%; < 0.001). The method of extraction was identified as an independent predictor of stone-free status ( < 0.001, odds ratio (SE compared to AE), 9.133, 95% confidence interval, 3.736-22.322).

CONCLUSION

The stone-free rate is improved by having the surgeon perform the stone extraction as part of the fURSL procedure.

摘要

目的

回顾性比较由术者(SE)操作取石篮或由手术助手(AE)操作取石篮进行软性输尿管镜碎石术(fURSL)的手术和临床效果,旨在阐明哪种方法能提供更好的术后无结石状态。

方法

本研究纳入 2015 年 4 月至 2016 年 12 月在我院行 fURSL 的患者,比较两组患者的人口统计学、临床、结石和手术变量。采用多因素逻辑回归分析确定与术后无结石和有结石状态相关的危险因素。

结果

我们的分析包括 196 例肾结石患者,其中 109 例采用 AE 方法,87 例采用 SE 方法。SE 组的无结石状态率(90.8%)高于 AE 组(61.5%;<0.001)。取石方法是无结石状态的独立预测因素(<0.001,优势比(SE 与 AE 相比),9.133,95%置信区间,3.736-22.322)。

结论

在 fURSL 手术中由术者进行取石可提高无结石率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c740/5998190/569f424bde95/BMRI2018-4526721.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c740/5998190/569f424bde95/BMRI2018-4526721.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c740/5998190/569f424bde95/BMRI2018-4526721.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Outcomes between Two Methods to Extract Stone Fragments during Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.两种方法在软性输尿管镜碎石术中取石碎片的结果比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 30;2018:4526721. doi: 10.1155/2018/4526721. eCollection 2018.
2
Residual fragments following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: incidence and predictors on postoperative computerized tomography.输尿管镜碎石术后残留碎片:术后计算机断层扫描的发生率和预测因素。
J Urol. 2012 Dec;188(6):2246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.040. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
3
Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases.非增强 CT 三维平均结石密度可预测输尿管结石钬激光碎石术的疗效。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Dec;48(6):547-552. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01178-7. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
4
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones in children using holmium: yag laser energy: results of a multicentric survey.钬激光碎石术治疗儿童输尿管结石:多中心调查结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Aug;15(4):391.e1-391.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 8.
5
Comparison of stone dusting efficiency when using different energy settings of Holmium: YAG laser for flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi.钬激光不同能量设置用于输尿管软镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石时结石粉末化效率的比较
Urol J. 2019 May 13;17(3):224-227. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4955.
6
The Dretler stone cone: a device to prevent ureteral stone migration-the initial clinical experience.德雷特勒结石锥:一种预防输尿管结石移位的装置——初步临床经验
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1985-8.
7
Combined retrograde flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with holmium YAG laser for renal calculi associated with ipsilateral ureteral stones.联合逆行软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗合并同侧输尿管结石的肾结石
J Endourol. 2009 Feb;23(2):253-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0368.
8
Use of the Escape nitinol stone retrieval basket facilitates fragmentation and extraction of ureteral and renal calculi: a pilot study.使用逃逸镍钛诺结石取出篮有助于输尿管和肾结石的破碎及取出:一项初步研究。
J Endourol. 2008 Jun;22(6):1213-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0070.
9
Ureteroscopic stone removal in the distal ureter. Why change?
J Urol. 1997 Jun;157(6):2081-3. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199706000-00012.
10
Ureteroscopic lithotripsy in Trendelenburg position for proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized, comparative study.头低脚高位输尿管镜碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Oct;46(10):1895-901. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0732-z. Epub 2014 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Factors to Predict Difficult Ureter during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.输尿管镜碎石术中预测输尿管困难的临床因素
Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Feb 2;2023:2584499. doi: 10.1155/2023/2584499. eCollection 2023.
2
Efficacy of one-surgeon basketing technique for stone extraction during flexible ureteroscopy for urolithiasis.单术者套篮技术在输尿管软镜治疗尿路结石取石术中的疗效
Arab J Urol. 2021 Feb 20;19(4):447-453. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1889943. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques.是否进行输尿管镜下激光碎石术:一项系统评价
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Apr;18(4):32. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0677-8.
2
Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I.结石的外科治疗:美国泌尿外科学会/腔内泌尿外科学会指南,第一部分。
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090. Epub 2016 May 27.
3
Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.
结石的外科治疗:美国泌尿外科学会/腔内泌尿外科学会指南,第二部分。
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091. Epub 2016 May 27.
4
EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.EAU 指南:尿石症的介入治疗
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
5
A comparison of standard PCNL and staged retrograde FURS in pelvis stones over 2 cm in diameter: a prospective randomized study.直径大于2厘米的肾盂结石中标准经皮肾镜取石术与分期逆行输尿管软镜碎石术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Jun;43(3):283-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0768-2. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
6
Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones.预测肾结石经输尿管软镜取石术后无结石状态的列线图的开发与内部验证
BJU Int. 2015 Mar;115(3):446-51. doi: 10.1111/bju.12775. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
7
A nomogram predicting severe adverse events after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: 12  372 patients in a Japanese national series.预测输尿管镜碎石术后严重不良事件的列线图:日本全国系列中的 12372 例患者。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):459-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11594.x. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
8
The most reliable preoperative assessment of renal stone burden as a predictor of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience.经钬激光碎石术行软性输尿管镜检查后结石无残留状态的术前预测因素:单中心经验。最可靠的术前评估是肾结石负担。
Urology. 2012 Sep;80(3):524-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
9
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.软性输尿管镜和激光碎石术治疗 >2cm 的结石:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1257-63. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0217. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
10
Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stone-free.肾结石逆行肾内手术的治疗结果及结石清除的预测因素
Korean J Urol. 2010 Nov;51(11):777-82. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.777. Epub 2010 Nov 17.