• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PFNA 与 DHS 螺旋刀片治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折。

PFNA vs. DHS helical blade for elderly patients with osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jul;22(1 Suppl):1-7. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201807_15346.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_201807_15346
PMID:30004570
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to compare the effects of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) helical blade treatments in patients with osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty elderly osteoporosis patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture complications admitted to the hospital between January 2013 and December 2014 were selected and divided into control (n=40) and observation (n=40) groups. The control group received DHS internal fixation while the observation group received PFNA treatment. Patients were followed up for 18 months, during which pre- and post-operative duration, Harris hip joint function scale, pain, bone mineral density and calcitonin level, 10 meter walking speed, five-fold-sit-to-stand test time, fracture healing and weight bearing time, and related complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Operational duration, hemorrhaging and drainage volume were all decreased in the observational group relative to the control group (p<0.05). Pre-operative Harris hip joint function scale scores were not significantly different between the two groups, but were superior in the observation group post-operation (p<0.05). A similar trend was observed for pain degree, bone mineral density and calcitonin levels, 10-meter walking speed, five-fold-sit-to-stand test time, and fracture and weight healing time (p<0.05). Complication incidence, such as coxa vara, loose nail, bone nonunion, delayed union of fracture, femoral head necrosis and deep venous thrombosis, etc., in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PFNA is characterized by minimal invasiveness, shorter time of operation, and accelerated post-operative recovery during the treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures, and effectively improved patient bone density post-operatively, thus further promoting joint function recovery and reducing complication incidence.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)和动力髋螺钉(DHS)螺旋刀片治疗骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折的效果。

方法

选取 2013 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月我院收治的老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折并发症患者 80 例,按随机数字表法分为对照组(n=40)和观察组(n=40)。对照组给予 DHS 内固定治疗,观察组给予 PFNA 治疗。患者均随访 18 个月,比较两组患者术前、术后手术时间、Harris 髋关节功能评分、疼痛程度、骨密度和降钙素水平、10 米步行速度、五次坐立时间、骨折愈合及负重时间,以及相关并发症。

结果

观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量及引流量均低于对照组(p<0.05)。两组患者术前 Harris 髋关节功能评分比较差异无统计学意义,观察组术后 Harris 髋关节功能评分优于对照组(p<0.05)。两组患者疼痛程度、骨密度和降钙素水平、10 米步行速度、五次坐立时间、骨折愈合及负重时间比较差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。观察组患者并发症发生率(如髋内翻、钉松动、骨不愈合、骨折延迟愈合、股骨头坏死、深静脉血栓形成等)明显低于对照组(p<0.05)。

结论

PFNA 治疗骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折具有微创、手术时间短、术后恢复快等特点,能有效提高患者术后骨密度,进一步促进关节功能恢复,降低并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
PFNA vs. DHS helical blade for elderly patients with osteoporotic femoral intertrochanteric fractures.PFNA 与 DHS 螺旋刀片治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jul;22(1 Suppl):1-7. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201807_15346.
2
Conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed proximal femoral nail antirotations or dynamic hip screw fixations for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.股骨近端防旋髓内钉或动力髋螺钉固定稳定型股骨转子间骨折失败后改行全髋关节置换术:一项至少随访3年的回顾性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jan 25;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1415-6.
3
Comparison of the clinical effect of DHS and PFNA on senile osteoporotic fracture and their significance of changes in BALP expression level.DHS 和 PFNA 治疗老年骨质疏松性骨折的临床效果比较及其 BALP 表达水平变化的意义。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2020 Dec 1;20(4):556-562.
4
[Comparative study of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and dynamic hip screw in the unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly].老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折中股骨近端抗旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉的对比研究
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 30;98(5):357-361. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.05.008.
5
[Comparison of three methods for the treatment of aged femoral intertrochanteric fracture].[三种治疗老年股骨转子间骨折方法的比较]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2012 Jul;25(7):549-53.
6
[Effectiveness comparison between proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and proximal femoral locking compression plate for intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients combined with hemiplegia due to cerebral infarction].股骨近端防旋髓内钉与股骨近端锁定加压钢板治疗老年脑梗死偏瘫患者股骨转子间骨折的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 15;32(11):1411-1416. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201805073.
7
Efficacy of femoral nail anti-rotation of helical blade in unstable intertrochanteric fracture.螺旋刀片股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的疗效。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Jul;21(3 Suppl):6-11.
8
The Asia proximal femoral nail antirotation versus the standard proximal femoral antirotation nail for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly Chinese patients.亚洲型股骨近端防旋髓内钉与标准股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗中国老年患者不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的比较
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Apr;101(2):143-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
9
Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折:髓内钉与动力髋螺钉的比较
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013 Dec;21(3):308-12. doi: 10.1177/230949901302100309.
10
[Comparative study of proximal femoral shortening after the third generation of Gamma nail versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture].第三代Gamma钉与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折后股骨近端缩短的对比研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 15;32(3):338-345. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201710065.

引用本文的文献

1
Time Is Bone: Missed Opportunities for Secondary Prevention After a Hip Fracture.时间就是骨头:髋部骨折后二级预防的错失机遇
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 17;14(16):5816. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165816.
2
Comparing Intramedullary Nails versus Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures on Post-operative Rehabilitation Outcomes - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折术后康复效果的比较——一项系统评价与Meta分析
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Jun 17;16:21514593251350490. doi: 10.1177/21514593251350490. eCollection 2025.
3
The effect of digital orthopedic 3D printing technology on the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: A meta-analysis.
数字化骨科3D打印技术对股骨粗隆间骨折手术治疗的影响:一项Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 25;104(17):e42193. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042193.
4
Risk of internal fixation treatment in intertrochanteric fracture based on different lateral femoral wall thickness: finite element analysis.基于不同股骨外侧壁厚度的股骨转子间骨折内固定治疗风险:有限元分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jun 13;25(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07582-z.
5
Finite element analysis of basicervical femoral neck fracture treated with proximal femoral bionic nail.股骨近端仿生钉治疗基底干股颈骨折的有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 6;18(1):926. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04415-y.
6
Evaluation of mobility recovery after hip fracture: a scoping review of randomized controlled studies.髋关节骨折后活动能力恢复的评估:随机对照研究的范围综述。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Feb;35(2):203-215. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06922-4. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
7
Morbidity and Mortality Analysis in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture with Two Fixation Systems: Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advance (TFNA).两种固定系统治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的发病率和死亡率分析:动力髋螺钉(DHS)或股骨近端防旋髓内钉(TFNA)
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;8(3):66. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8030066.
8
Barriers and facilitators of weight bearing after hip fracture surgery among older adults. A scoping review.老年人髋部骨折手术后承重的障碍和促进因素。范围综述。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Jul;34(7):1193-1205. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06735-5. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
9
Effect of proximal femoral nail antirotation on clinical outcome, inflammatory factors and myocardial injury markers in patients with femoral trochanteric fracture.股骨近端防旋髓内钉对股骨转子间骨折患者临床疗效、炎症因子及心肌损伤标志物的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):4795-4803. eCollection 2022.
10
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.