Daskalakis Ioannis I, Bastian Johannes D, Tosounidis Theodoros H
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical School, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, 71110 Heraklion, Greece.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 17;14(16):5816. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165816.
Early evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis following a hip fracture is of paramount importance for secondary fracture prevention. Nevertheless, the extent to which osteoporosis management is documented in studies reporting on operatively treated hip fractures in elderly patients is unclear. This study is the first systematic review aiming to investigate and summarize the reporting of osteoporosis management in studies with operatively treated hip fractures in elderly patients. This systematic review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search within the last decade of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Ovid was performed. Studies reporting on operatively treated hip fractures in patients older than 65 years of age were included. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and performed data extraction. A subsequent descriptive synthesis was performed. Eighty-six (86) articles were included in this study. Osteoporosis management was reported in only twelve (12) studies. Only six (6) of them were conducted in institutions with established orthogeriatric care. Osteoporosis management is underreported in studies involving operatively treated hip fracture patients. This reflects a significant gap in the overall reporting of secondary fracture prevention actions. Consequently, we advocate for both (a) clinical vigilance for adherence to best practice related to osteoporosis management after the first hip fracture and reporting of the results and (b) the research focusing on the outcomes of secondary fracture prevention efforts.
髋部骨折后早期评估和治疗骨质疏松症对于预防二次骨折至关重要。然而,在报告老年患者手术治疗髋部骨折的研究中,骨质疏松症管理的记录程度尚不清楚。本研究是第一项系统评价,旨在调查和总结老年患者手术治疗髋部骨折研究中骨质疏松症管理的报告情况。 本系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行。在过去十年内对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和Ovid进行了全面检索。纳入报告65岁以上患者手术治疗髋部骨折的研究。两名评价者独立筛选研究并进行数据提取。随后进行描述性综合分析。 本研究纳入了86篇文章。只有12项研究报告了骨质疏松症管理情况。其中只有6项是在设有老年骨科护理机构进行的。 在涉及手术治疗髋部骨折患者的研究中,骨质疏松症管理的报告不足。这反映了二次骨折预防行动总体报告方面的重大差距。因此,我们主张:(a)临床应警惕首次髋部骨折后遵守骨质疏松症管理的最佳做法并报告结果;(b)开展侧重于二次骨折预防努力结果的研究。