Suppr超能文献

在体外肺模型环境中,带套囊和不带套囊的儿科气管内导管的呼吸功。

Work of breathing for cuffed and uncuffed pediatric endotracheal tubes in an in vitro lung model setting.

作者信息

Thomas Jörg, Weiss Markus, Cannizzaro Vincenzo, Both Christian Peter, Schmidt Alexander Robert

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, University Children's Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Children's Research Centre, University Children's Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Sep;28(9):780-787. doi: 10.1111/pan.13430. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade, cuffed endotracheal tubes are increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia and also in pediatric intensive care. However, the smaller inner diameter of cuffed endotracheal tubes and, implicitly, the increased endotracheal tube resistance is still a matter of debate.

AIMS

This in vitro study investigated work of breathing and inspiratory airway pressures in cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes and the impact of pressure support ventilation and automatic tube compensation.

METHODS

In 5 simulated neonatal and pediatric lung models, the Active Servo Lung 5000 and an intensive care ventilator were used to quantify the differences in work of breathing under spontaneous breathing (with and without pressure support ventilation and automatic tube compensation) between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes. Additionally, differences in inspiratory airway pressures, measured either proximal or distal of the endotracheal tube, between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes under mechanical ventilation were investigated.

RESULTS

Work of breathing was overall 10.27% [95% confidence interval 9.01-11.94] higher with cuffed than with uncuffed endotracheal tubes and was dramatically reduced by 34.19% [95% confidence interval 31.61-35.25] with the application of pressure support. Automatic tube compensation almost diminished work of breathing differences between the 2 endotracheal tube types in nearly all pediatric lung models. Peak inspiratory and mean airway pressures measured at the proximal endotracheal tube end revealed significantly higher values in cuffed than in uncuffed endotracheal tubes. However, these differences measured at the distal end of the endotracheal tube became minimal.

CONCLUSION

This in vitro study confirmed significant differences in work of breathing and inspiratory pressures between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes. Work of breathing, however, is almost neutralized by pressure support ventilation with automatic tube compensation and distal inspiratory airway pressures that, from a clinical perspective, are not significantly increased.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,带套囊气管内导管在小儿麻醉及小儿重症监护中使用得越来越多。然而,带套囊气管内导管较小的内径以及随之而来的气管内导管阻力增加,仍是一个存在争议的问题。

目的

本体外研究调查了带套囊和不带套囊气管内导管的呼吸功及吸气气道压力,以及压力支持通气和自动导管补偿的影响。

方法

在5个模拟新生儿和小儿肺模型中,使用主动伺服肺5000和一台重症监护呼吸机,来量化带套囊和不带套囊气管内导管在自主呼吸(有和没有压力支持通气及自动导管补偿)时呼吸功的差异。此外,还研究了在机械通气时,带套囊和不带套囊气管内导管在气管内导管近端或远端测得的吸气气道压力差异。

结果

带套囊气管内导管的总体呼吸功比不带套囊气管内导管高10.27%[95%置信区间9.01 - 11.94],应用压力支持后显著降低了34.19%[95%置信区间31.61 - 35.25]。在几乎所有小儿肺模型中,自动导管补偿几乎消除了两种气管内导管类型之间的呼吸功差异。在气管内导管近端测得的吸气峰压和平均气道压显示,带套囊气管内导管的值显著高于不带套囊气管内导管。然而,在气管内导管远端测得的这些差异变得极小。

结论

本体外研究证实了带套囊和不带套囊气管内导管在呼吸功和吸气压力方面存在显著差异。然而,通过压力支持通气和自动导管补偿,呼吸功几乎被抵消,并且从临床角度来看,远端吸气气道压力没有显著增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验